Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:01:38.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Internal hydraulic jumps in two-layer systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2015

Peter G. Baines*
Affiliation:
Department of Infrastructure Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia
*
Email address for correspondence: p.baines@unimelb.edu.au

Abstract

This paper describes a new model of internal hydraulic jumps in two-layer systems that places no restrictions (such as the Boussinesq approximation) on the densities of the two fluids. The model is based on that of Borden and Meiburg (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 276, 2013, R1) for Boussinesq jumps, and has the appropriate behaviour in various limits (single-layer, small amplitude, Boussinesq, infinite depth). The energy flux loss in each layer across the jump is positive for all realistic jumps, reaching a maximum for the jump with maximum speed. Larger-amplitude jumps are possible, with decreasing energy loss, down to the ‘conjugate state’ of zero energy loss. However, it is argued that such states may be difficult to realise in practice, and if formed, will tend to the jump with maximum speed. The energy loss is mostly in the contracting layer unless the density there is small. The two-layer model is extended to incorporate mixing between the layers within the jump, with mixing based on the Richardson number.

Type
Papers
Copyright
© 2015 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baines, P. G. 1984 A unified description of two-layer flow over topography. J. Fluid Mech. 146, 127167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baines, P. G. 1995, 1997 Topographic Effects in Stratified Flows. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Benjamin, T. B. 1966 Internal waves of finite amplitude and permanent form. J. Fluid Mech. 25, 241270.Google Scholar
Benjamin, T. B. 1968 Gravity currents and related phenomena. J. Fluid Mech. 31, 209248.Google Scholar
Borden, Z. & Meiburg, E. 2013 Circulation-based models of Boussinesq internal bores. J. Fluid Mech. 276, R1.Google Scholar
Borden, Z., Meiburg, E. & Constantinescu, G. 2012 Internal bores: an improved model via a detailed analysis of the energy budget. J. Fluid Mech. 703, 279314.Google Scholar
Chu, V. H. & Baddour, R. E. 1977 Surges, waves and mixing in two-layer density stratified flow. In Proceedings of the 17th International Association of Hydraul. Res., vol. 1, pp. 303310. IAHR.Google Scholar
Klemp, J. B., Rotunno, R. & Skamarock, W. C. 1997 On the propagation of internal bores. J. Fluid Mech. 331, 81106.Google Scholar
Lamb, K. G. & Wan, B. 1998 Conjugate flows and flat solitary waves for a continuously stratified fluid. Phys. Fluids 10, 20612069.Google Scholar
Li, M. & Cummins, P. F. 1998 A note on hydraulic theory of internal bores. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans 28, 17.Google Scholar
Saffman, P. G. 1992, 1995 Vortex Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thorpe, S. A. 2010 Turbulent hydraulic jumps in a stratified shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 654, 305350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, S. A. & Li, Lin 2014 Turbulent hydraulic jumps in a stratified shear flow. Part 2. J. Fluid Mech. 758, 94120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, B. L. & Helfrich, K. R. 2014 A model for internal bores in continuous stratification. J. Fluid Mech. 761, 282304.Google Scholar
Wood, I. R. & Simpson, J. E. 1984 Jumps in layered miscible fluids. J. Fluid Mech. 140, 329342.Google Scholar
Yih, C.-S. & Guha, C. R. 1955 Hydraulic jump in a fluid system of two layers. Tellus 7, 358366.Google Scholar