Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:59:25.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Internal solitary waves in a two-fluid system with a free surface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2016

Tsubasa Kodaira
Affiliation:
Department of Oceanography, Dalhousie University, 1355 Oxford Street, Halifax, NS, Canada
Takuji Waseda
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8563, Japan
Motoyasu Miyata
Affiliation:
Faculty of Liberal Arts, The Open University of Japan, Chiba 261-8586, Japan
Wooyoung Choi*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Sciences, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ 07102-1982, USA
*
Email address for correspondence: wychoi@njit.edu

Abstract

Internal solitary waves in a system of two fluids, silicone oil and water, bounded above by a free surface are studied both experimentally and theoretically. By adjusting an extra volume of silicone oil released from a reservoir, a wide range of amplitude waves are generated in a wave tank. Wave profiles as well as wave speeds are measured using multiple wave probes and are then compared with both the weakly nonlinear Korteweg–de Vries (KdV) models and the strongly nonlinear Miyata–Choi–Camassa (MCC) models. As the density difference between the two fluids in the experiment is relatively small (approximately 14 %), but non-negligible, special attention is paid to the effect of the boundary condition at the top surface. The nonlinear models valid for rigid-lid (RL) and free-surface (FS) boundary conditions are considered separately. It is found that the solitary wave of the FS model for a given amplitude is consistently narrower than that of the RL model and it propagates at a slightly lower speed. Due to strong nonlinearity in the internal-wave motion, the weakly nonlinear KdV models fail to describe the measured internal solitary wave profiles of intermediate and large wave amplitudes. The strongly nonlinear MCC-FS model agrees better with the measurements than the MCC-RL model, which indicates that the free-surface boundary condition at the top surface is crucial in describing the internal solitary waves in the experiment correctly. Leaving the top surface free in the experiment allows us to observe small and relatively short wave packets on the top surface, particularly when the amplitude of the internal solitary wave is large. Once excited, the wave packet is located above the front half of the internal solitary wave and propagates with a speed close to that of the internal solitary wave underneath. A simple resonance mechanism between short surface waves and long internal waves without and with nonlinear effects is examined to estimate the characteristic wavelength of modulated short surface waves, which is found to be in good agreement with the observed wavelength when nonlinearity is taken into account. Using ray theory, the evolution of short surface waves in the presence of a background current induced by an internal solitary wave is also investigated to examine the location of the modulated surface wave packet.

Type
Papers
Copyright
© 2016 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Deceased 5 August 2013.

References

Barros, R. & Choi, W. 2014 Elementary stratified flow with stability at low Richardson number. Phys. Fluids 26, 124107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barros, R. & Gavrilyuk, S. L. 2007 Dispersive nonlinear waves in two-layer flows with free surface. II. Large amplitude solitary waves embedded into the continuous spectrum. Stud. Appl. Maths 119, 213251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barros, R., Gavrilyuk, S. L. & Teshukov, V. M. 2007 Dispersive nonlinear waves in two- layer flows with free surface. I. Model derivation and general properties. Stud. Appl. Maths 119, 191211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, T. B. 1966 Internal waves of finite amplitude and permanent form. J. Fluid Mech. 25, 97116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camassa, R., Choi, W., Michallet, H., Rusas, P. & Sveen, J. K. 2006 On the realm of validity of strongly nonlinear asymptotic approximations for internal waves. J. Fluid Mech. 549, 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, M., Fructus, D., Grue, J., Jensen, A. & Davies, P. A. 2008 Convectively induced shear instability in large amplitude internal solitary waves. Phys. Fluids 20, 12660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, W. & Camassa, R. 1996 Weakly nonlinear internal waves in a two-fluid system. J. Fluid Mech. 313, 83103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, W. & Camassa, R. 1999 Fully nonlinear internal waves in a two-fluid system. J. Fluid Mech. 396, 136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donato, A. N., Peregrine, D. H. & Stocker, J. R. 1999 The focusing of surface waves by internal waves. J. Fluid Mech. 384, 2758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fructus, D., Carr, M., Grue, J., Jensen, A. & Davies, P. A. 2009 Shear-induced breaking of large internal solitary waves. J. Fluid Mech. 620, 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goullet, A. & Choi, W. 2008 Large amplitude internal solitary waves in a two-layer system of piecewise linear stratification. Phys. Fluids 20, 096601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grue, J., Jensen, A., Russ, P.-O. & Sveen, J. K. 1999 Properties of large-amplitude internal waves. J. Fluid Mech. 380, 257278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grue, J., Jensen, A., Russ, P.-O. & Sveen, J. K. 2000 Breaking and broadening of internal solitary waves. J. Fluid Mech. 413, 181217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kao, T. W., Pan, F.-S. & Renouard, D. 1985 Internal solitons on the pycnocline: generation, propagation, and shoaling and breaking over a slope. J. Fluid Mech. 159, 1953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koop, C. G. & Butler, G. 1981 An investigation of internal solitary waves in a two-fluid system. J. Fluid Mech. 112, 225251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, A. K., Chang, Y. S., Hsu, M.-K. & Liang, N. K. 1998 Evolution of nonlinear internal waves in the East and South China Seas. J. Geophys. Res. 103, 79958008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luzzatto-Fegiz, P. & Helfrich, K. R. 2014 Laboratory experiments and simulations for solitary internal waves with trapped cores. J. Fluid Mech. 757, 354380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michallet, H. & Barthelemy, E. 1998 Experimental study of interfacial solitary waves. J. Fluid Mech. 366, 159177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyata, M. 1985 An internal solitary wave of large amplitude. La mer 23 (2), 4348.Google Scholar
Miyata, M. 1988 Long internal waves of large amplitude. In Proceedings of the IUTAM Symposium on Nonlinear Water Waves (ed. Horikawa, H. & Maruo, H.), pp. 399406. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moni, R. & King, W. 1995 On the realm of validity of strongly nonlinear asymptotic approximations for internal waves. Q. J. Mech. Appl. Maths 48, 2138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, A. S. & Stoker, J. J. 1960 Solitary waves in liquids having non-constant density. Commun. Pure Appl. Maths 13, 115164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segur, H. & Hammack, J. L. 1982 Soliton models of long internal waves. J. Fluid Mech. 118, 285304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, L. R. 1973 Interfacial solitary waves in a two-fluid medium. Phys. Fluids 16 (11), 17961804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar