Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T19:30:18.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interphasial energy transfer and particle dissipation in particle-laden wall turbulence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2013

Lihao Zhao*
Affiliation:
Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway
Helge I. Andersson
Affiliation:
Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway
Jurriaan J. J. Gillissen
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Leeghwaterstraat 39, 2628 CB Delft, The Netherlands
*
Email address for correspondence: lihao.zhao@ntnu.no

Abstract

Transfer of mechanical energy between solid spherical particles and a Newtonian carrier fluid has been explored in two-way coupled direct numerical simulations of turbulent channel flow. The inertial particles have been treated as individual point particles in a Lagrangian framework and their feedback on the fluid phase has been incorporated in the Navier–Stokes equations. At sufficiently large particle response times the Reynolds shear stress and the turbulence intensities in the spanwise and wall-normal directions were attenuated whereas the velocity fluctuations were augmented in the streamwise direction. The physical mechanisms involved in the particle–fluid interactions were analysed in detail, and it was observed that the fluid transferred energy to the particles in the core region of the channel whereas the fluid received kinetic energy from the particles in the wall region. A local imbalance in the work performed by the particles on the fluid and the work exerted by the fluid on the particles was observed. This imbalance gave rise to a particle-induced energy dissipation which represents a loss of mechanical energy from the fluid–particle suspension. An independent examination of the work associated with the different directional components of the Stokes force revealed that the dominating energy transfer was associated with the streamwise component. Both the mean and fluctuating parts of the Stokes force promoted streamwise fluctuations in the near-wall region. The kinetic energy associated with the cross-sectional velocity components was damped due to work done by the particles, and the energy was dissipated rather than recovered as particle kinetic energy. Componentwise scatter plots of the instantaneous velocity versus the instantaneous slip-velocity provided further insight into the energy transfer mechanisms, and the observed modulations of the flow field could thereby be explained.

Type
Papers
Copyright
©2013 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balachandar, S. & Eaton, J. K. 2010 Turbulent dispersed multiphase flow. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 42, 111133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bijlard, M. J., Oliemans, R. V. A., Portela, L. M. & Ooms, G. 2010 Direct numerical simulation analysis of local flow topology in a particle-laden turbulent channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 653, 3556.Google Scholar
Dritselis, C. D. & Vlachos, N. S. 2008 Numerical study of educed coherent structures in the near-wall region of a particle-laden channel flow. Phys. Fluids 20, 055103.Google Scholar
Dritselis, C. D. & Vlachos, N. S. 2011 Numerical investigation of momentum exchange between particles and coherent structures in low Re turbulent channel flow. Phys. Fluids 23, 025103.Google Scholar
Eaton, J. K. & Fessler, J. R. 1994 Preferential concentration of particles by turbulence. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 20, 169209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elghobashi, S. & Truesdell, G. C. 1993 On the two-way interaction between homogeneous turbulence and dispersed solid particles. Part 1. Turbulence modification. Phys. Fluids A 5, 17901801.Google Scholar
Gillissen, J. J. J., Boersma, B. J., Mortensen, P. H. & Andersson, H. I. 2008 Fibre-induced drag reduction. J. Fluid Mech. 602, 209218.Google Scholar
Gore, R. A. & Crowe, C. T. 1989 The effect of particle size on modulating turbulent intensity. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 15, 279285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanjalic, K. & Launder, B. 2011 Modelling Turbulence in Engineering and the Environment. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hussainov, M., Kartushinsky, A., Rudi, Ü., Shcheglov, I., Kohnen, G. & Sommerfeld, M. 2000 Experimental investigation of turbulence modulation by solid particles in a grid-generated vertical flow. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 21, 365373.Google Scholar
Kaftori, D., Hetsroni, G. & Banerjee, S. 1995a Particle behaviour in the turbulent boundary layer. Part 1. Motion, deposition and entrainment. Phys. Fluids 7, 10951106.Google Scholar
Kaftori, D., Hetsroni, G. & Banerjee, S. 1995b Particle behaviour in the turbulent boundary layer. Part 2. Velocity and distribution profiles. Phys. Fluids 7, 110711221.Google Scholar
Kulick, J. D., Fessler, J. R. & Eaton, J. K. 1994 Particle response and turbulence modification in fully developed channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 277, 109134.Google Scholar
Li, Y., McLaughlin, J. B., Kontomaris, K. & Portela, L. 2001 Numerical simulation of particle-laden turbulent channel flow. Phys. Fluids 13, 29572976.Google Scholar
Mortensen, P. H., Andersson, H. I., Gillissen, J. J. J. & Boersma, B. J. 2007 Particle spin in a turbulent shear flow. Phys. Fluids 19, 078109.Google Scholar
Mortensen, P. H., Andersson, H. I., Gillissen, J. J. J. & Boersma, B. J. 2008 Dynamics of prolate ellipsoidal particles in a turbulent channel flow. Phys. Fluids 20, 093302.Google Scholar
Pan, Y. & Banerjee, S. 1996 Numerical simulation of particle interactions with wall turbulence. Phys. Fluids 8, 27332755.Google Scholar
Picciotto, M., Giusti, A., Marchioli, C. & Soldati, A. 2006 Turbulence modulation by micro-particles in boundary layers. In IUTAM Symposium on Computational Approaches to Multiphase Flow (ed. Balachandar, S. & Prosperetti, A.), pp. 5362. Springer.Google Scholar
Rani, S. L., Winkler, C. M. & Vanka, S. P. 2004 Numerical simulations of turbulence modulation by dense particles in a fully developed pipe flow. Powder Technol. 141, 8099.Google Scholar
Rashidi, M., Hetsroni, G. & Banerjee, S. 1990 Particle–turbulence interaction in a boundary layer. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 16, 935949.Google Scholar
Righetti, M. & Romano, G. P. 2004 Particle–fluid interactions in a plane near-wall turbulent flow. J. Fluid Mech. 505, 93121.Google Scholar
Rossetti, S. J. & Pfeffer, R 1972 Drag reduction in dilute flowing gas–solid suspensions. AIChE J. 18, 3139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squires, K. D. & Eaton, J. K. 1990 Particle response and turbulence modification in isotropic turbulence. Phys. Fluids A 2, 11911203.Google Scholar
Tanaka, T. & Eaton, J. K. 2008 Classification of turbulence modification by dispersed spheres using a novel dimensionless number. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 114502.Google Scholar
Truesdell, G. C. & Elghobashi, S. 1994 On the two-way interaction between homogeneous turbulence and dispersed solid particles. Part 2. Particle dispersion. Phys. Fluids 6, 14051407.Google Scholar
Van Hout, R. 2011 Time-resolved PIV measurements of the interaction of polystyrene beads with near-wall-coherent structures in a turbulent channel flow. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 37, 346357.Google Scholar
Vreman, A. W. 2007 Turbulence characteristics of particle-laden pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 584, 235279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamamoto, Y., Potthoff, M., Tanaka, T., Kajishima, T. & Tsuji, Y. 2001 Large-eddy simulation of turbulence gas-particle flow in a vertical channel: effect of considering inter-particle collisions. J. Fluid Mech. 442, 303334.Google Scholar
Zhao, L. H. & Andersson, H. I. 2011 On particle spin in two-way coupled turbulent channel flow simulations. Phys. Fluids 23, 093302.Google Scholar
Zhao, L. H. & Andersson, H. I. 2012 Statistics of particle suspensions in turbulent channel flow. Commun. Comput. Phys. 11, 13111322.Google Scholar
Zhao, L. H., Andersson, H. I. & Gillissen, J. J. J. 2010 Turbulence modulation and drag reduction by spherical particles. Phys. Fluids 22, 081702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, L. H., Marchioli, C. & Andersson, H. I. 2012 Stokes number effects on particle slip velocity in wall-bounded turbulence and implications for dispersion models. Phys. Fluids 24, 021705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar