Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T19:16:44.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Linear, nonlinear and transitional regimes of second-mode instability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 October 2020

S. Unnikrishnan Open the ORCID record for S. Unnikrishnan [Opens in a new window]  and
Datta V. Gaitonde Open the ORCID record for Datta V. Gaitonde [Opens in a new window]
S. Unnikrishnan*
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL32310, USA
Datta V. Gaitonde
Affiliation:
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH43210, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: usasidharannair@fsu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The evolution of the potent second-mode instability in hypersonic boundary layers (HBLs) is examined holistically, by tracking its linear and nonlinear evolution, followed by its role in initiating transition and eventual breakdown of the HBL into a fully turbulent state. Linear stability theory is utilized to first identify the features of the second-mode wave after $FS$-synchronization. These are then employed in separate linearly and nonlinearly forced two-dimensional (2-D) and three-dimensional (3-D) direct numerical simulations (DNS). The nonlinear 2-D DNS shows saturation of the fundamental frequency, and the resulting superharmonics induce tightly braided ‘rope-like’ patterns near the generalized inflection point (GIP). The instability exhibits a second region of growth constituted by the fundamental frequency downstream of the primary envelope, which is absent in the linear scenario. Subsequent fully 3-D DNS identify this region as crucial in amplifying oblique instabilities riding on the 2-D second-mode ‘rollers’. This results in lambda vortices below the GIP, which are detached from the rollers in the inner boundary layer. Streamwise vortex-stretching results in a localized peak in length scales inside the HBL, eventually forming hairpin vortices. Spectral analyses track the transformation of harmonic peaks into a turbulent spectrum. The appearance of oblique modes at the fundamental frequency suggests that fundamental resonance is the most dominant mechanism of transition. The bispectrum reveals coupled nonlinear interactions between the fundamental and its superharmonics leading to spectral broadening, as well as traces of subharmonic resonance. The global forms of the fundamental and subharmonic modes show that the former disintegrate at the location of spanwise breakdown, beyond which the latter amplify. Statistical analyses of the near-wall flow field indicate an increase in large-scale ‘splatting’ motions immediately following transition, resulting in extreme skin-friction events, which equilibrate as turbulence sets in. Fundamental resonance results in complete breakdown of streamwise streaks in the lower log-layer, ultimately resulting in a fully turbulent HBL.

JFM classification

Compressible Flows: Compressible boundary layers Instability: Transition to turbulence Instability: Nonlinear instability
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 905 , 25 December 2020 , A25
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adams, N. A. & Kleiser, L. 1996 Subharmonic transition to turbulence in a flat-plate boundary layer at mach number 4.5. J. Fluid Mech. 317, 301–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agostini, L., Leschziner, M. & Gaitonde, D. 2016 Skewness-induced asymmetric modulation of small-scale turbulence by large-scale structures. Phys. Fluids 28 (1), 015110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agostini, L. & Leschziner, M. A. 2014 On the influence of outer large-scale structures on near-wall turbulence in channel flow. Phys. Fluids 26 (7), 075107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, D., Tannehill, J. & Pletcher, R. 1984 Computational Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Balsara, D. S. & Shu, C.-W. 2000 Monotonicity preserving weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes with increasingly high order of accuracy. J. Comput. Phys. 160 (2), 405–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beam, R. & Warming, R. 1978 An implicit factored scheme for the compressible Navier–Stokes equations. AIAA J. 16 (4), 393–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhagatwala, A. & Lele, S. K. 2009 A modified artificial viscosity approach for compressible turbulence simulations. J. Comput. Phys. 228 (14), 4965–4969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bountin, D., Shiplyuk, A. & Maslov, A. 2008 Evolution of nonlinear processes in a hypersonic boundary layer on a sharp cone. J. Fluid Mech. 611, 427–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casper, K. M., Beresh, S. J. & Schneider, S. P. 2014 Pressure fluctuations beneath instability wavepackets and turbulent spots in a hypersonic boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 756, 1058–1091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chokani, N. 1999 Nonlinear spectral dynamics of hypersonic laminar boundary layer flow. Phys. Fluids 11 (12), 3846–3851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, S. A., Humble, R. A., Hofferth, J. W. & Saric, W. S. 2019 Nonlinear behaviour of the Mack mode in a hypersonic boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 872, 74–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craik, A. D. D. 1971 Non-linear resonant instability in boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 50 (2), 393–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Driest, E. R. 1956 The Problem of Aerodynamic Heating. Institute of the Aeronautical Sciences.Google Scholar
Egorov, I. V., Fedorov, A. V. & Soudakov, V. G. 2006 Direct numerical simulation of disturbances generated by periodic suction-blowing in a hypersonic boundary layer. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 20 (1), 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egorov, I. V. & Novikov, A. V. 2016 Direct numerical simulation of laminar–turbulent flow over a flat plate at hypersonic flow speeds. Comp. Math. Math. Phys. 56 (6), 1048–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eitel-Amor, G., Örlü, R., Schlatter, P. & Flores, O. 2015 Hairpin vortices in turbulent boundary layers. Phys. Fluids 27 (2), 025108.Google Scholar
Fedorov, A. & Tumin, A. 2011 High-speed boundary-layer instability: old terminology and a new framework. AIAA J. 49 (8), 1647–1657.Google Scholar
Fedorov, A. V. 2003 Receptivity of a high-speed boundary layer to acoustic disturbances. J. Fluid Mech. 491, 101–129.Google Scholar
Fedorov, A. V. 2011 Transition and stability of high-speed boundary layers. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43, 79–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedorov, A. V. & Tumin, A. 2003 Initial-value problem for hypersonic boundary-layer flows. AIAA J. 41 (3), 379–389.Google Scholar
Franko, K. J. & Lele, S. K. 2013 Breakdown mechanisms and heat transfer overshoot in hypersonic zero pressure gradient boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 730, 491–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hader, C. & Fasel, H. F. 2018 Towards simulating natural transition in hypersonic boundary layers via random inflow disturbances. J. Fluid Mech. 847, R3.Google Scholar
Hader, C. & Fasel, H. F. 2019 Direct numerical simulations of hypersonic boundary-layer transition for a flared cone: fundamental breakdown. J. Fluid Mech. 869, 341–384.Google Scholar
Hader, C. & Fasel, H. F. 2020 Three-dimensional wave packet in a Mach 6 boundary layer on a flared cone. J. Fluid Mech. 885, R3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbert, T. 1988 Secondary instability of boundary layers. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 20 (1), 487–526.Google Scholar
Jeong, J., Hussain, F., Schoppa, W. & Kim, J. 1997 Coherent structures near the wall in a turbulent channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 332, 185–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jocksch, A. & Kleiser, L. 2008 Growth of turbulent spots in high-speed boundary layers on a flat plate. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 29 (6), 1543–1557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, R. E., Laurence, S. J., Smith, M. S. & Marineau, E. C. 2018 Visualization of the second-mode instability on a sharp cone at Mach 14. AIAA Paper 2018-2083, AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting.Google Scholar
Khotyanovsky, D. V. & Kudryavtsev, A. N. 2016 Numerical simulation of the evolution of unstable disturbances of various modes and initial stages of the laminar-turbulent transition in the boundary layer at the freestream Mach number $M = 6$. Thermophys. Aeromech. 23 (6), 809–818.Google Scholar
Kimmel, R. & Kendall, J. 1991 Nonlinear disturbances in a hypersonic laminar boundary layer. AIAA Paper 91-320, 29th Aerospace Sciences Meeting.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimmel, R. L. 1993 The effect of pressure gradients on transition zone length in hypersonic boundary layers. Tech. Rep. Flight Dynamics Directorate, Wright Laboratory.Google Scholar
Koevary, C., Laible, A., Mayer, C. & Fasel, H. 2010 Numerical simulations of controlled transition for a circular cone at Mach 8. AIAA Paper 2010-4598, 40th Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit.Google Scholar
Laurence, S. J., Wagner, A. & Hannemann, K. 2016 Experimental study of second-mode instability growth and breakdown in a hypersonic boundary layer using high-speed schlieren visualization. J. Fluid Mech. 797, 471–503.Google Scholar
van Leer, B. 1979 Towards the ultimate conservation difference scheme V, a second-order sequel to Godunov's method. J. Comput. Phys. 32, 101–136.Google Scholar
Ma, Y. & Zhong, X. 2003 Receptivity of a supersonic boundary layer over a flat plate. Part 1. Wave structures and interactions. J. Fluid Mech. 488, 31–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mack, L. M. 1975 Linear stability theory and the problem of supersonic boundary-layer transition. AIAA J. 13 (3), 278–289.Google Scholar
Mack, L. M. 1984 Boundary-layer linear stability theory. AGARD Rep. 709.Google Scholar
Malik, M. R. 1990 Numerical methods for hypersonic boundary layer stability. J. Comput. Phys. 86 (2), 376–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, C. S. J., Von Terzi, D. A. & Fasel, H. F. 2011 Direct numerical simulation of complete transition to turbulence via oblique breakdown at mach 3. J. Fluid Mech. 674, 5–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendel, J. M. 1991 Tutorial on higher-order statistics (spectra) in signal processing and system theory: theoretical results and some applications. Proc. IEEE 79 (3), 278–305.Google Scholar
Morkovin, M. V. 1969 On the many faces of transition. In Viscous Drag Reduction (ed. C. S. Wells), pp. 1–31. Springer.Google Scholar
Novikov, A., Egorov, I. & Fedorov, A. 2016 Direct numerical simulation of wave packets in hypersonic compression-corner flow. AIAA J. 54 (7), 2034–2050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özgen, S. & Kırcalı, S. A. 2008 Linear stability analysis in compressible, flat-plate boundary-layers. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 22 (1), 1–20.Google Scholar
Pan, C. & Kwon, Y. 2018 Extremely high wall-shear stress events in a turbulent boundary layer. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1001, 012004.Google Scholar
Pruett, C. D. & Chang, C. -L. 1995 Spatial direct numerical simulation of high-speed boundary-layer flows. Part 2. Transition on a cone in Mach 8 flow. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 7 (5), 397–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulliam, T. H. & Chaussee, D. S. 1981 A diagonal form of an implicit approximate-factorization algorithm. J. Comput. Phys. 39 (2), 347–363.Google Scholar
Roe, P. L. 1981 Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors and difference schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 43, 357–372.Google Scholar
Rowley, C. W., Mezić, I., Bagheri, S., Schlatter, P. & Henningson, D. S. 2009 Spectral analysis of nonlinear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 641, 115–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, C. J. & Blottner, F. G. 2006 Review and assessment of turbulence models for hypersonic flows. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 42 (7–8), 469–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayadi, T., Hamman, C. W. & Moin, P. 2013 Direct numerical simulation of complete h-type and k-type transitions with implications for the dynamics of turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 724, 480–509.Google Scholar
Schetz, J. A. & Bowersox, R. D. W. 2011 Boundary Layer Analysis. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.Google Scholar
Schlatter, P. & Örlü, R. 2010 Assessment of direct numerical simulation data of turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 659, 116–126.Google Scholar
Schmid, P. J. 2010 Dynamic mode decomposition of numerical and experimental data. J. Fluid Mech. 656, 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, S. P. 2013 Developing mechanism-based methods for estimating hypersonic boundary-layer transition in flight: the role of quiet tunnels. AIAA Paper 2013-2608, 43rd Fluid Dynamics Conference.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiplyuk, A. N., Bountin, D. A., Maslov, A. A. & Chokani, N. 2003 Nonlinear mechanisms of the initial stage of the hypersonic boundary layer transition. J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys. 44 (5), 654–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shu, C. W. & Osher, S. 1988 Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 77 (2), 439–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sivasubramanian, J. & Fasel, H. F. 2014 Numerical investigation of the development of three-dimensional wavepackets in a sharp cone boundary layer at Mach 6. J. Fluid Mech. 756, 600–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sivasubramanian, J. & Fasel, H. F. 2015 Direct numerical simulation of transition in a sharp cone boundary layer at Mach 6: fundamental breakdown. J. Fluid Mech. 768, 175–218.Google Scholar
Stetson, K. & Kimmel, R. 1993 On the breakdown of a hypersonic laminar boundary layer. AIAA Paper 1993-0896, 31st Aerospace Sciences Meeting.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unnikrishnan, S. & Gaitonde, D. V. 2019 First-mode-induced nonlinear breakdown in a hypersonic boundary layer. Comput. Fluids 191, 104249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinokur, M. 1974 Conservation equations of gasdynamics in curvilinear coordinate systems. J. Comput. Phys. 14 (2), 105–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, X. & Zhong, X. 2009 Effect of wall perturbations on the receptivity of a hypersonic boundary layer. Phys. Fluids 21 (4), 044101.Google Scholar
Wang, X., Zhong, X. & Ma, Y. 2011 Response of a hypersonic boundary layer to wall blowing-suction. AIAA J. 49 (7), 1336–1353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, S. 1997 A review of hypersonic boundary layer stability experiments in a quiet Mach 6 wind tunnel. AIAA Paper 1997–1819, 28th Fluid Dynamics Conference.Google Scholar
Wu, X. & Moin, P. 2009 Direct numerical simulation of turbulence in a nominally zero-pressure-gradient flat-plate boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 630, 5–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yao, Y., Krishnan, L., Sandham, N. D. & Roberts, G. T. 2007 The effect of mach number on unstable disturbances in shock/boundary-layer interactions. Phys. Fluids 19 (5), 054104.Google Scholar
Zhong, X. 2001 Leading-edge receptivity to free-stream disturbance waves for hypersonic flow over a parabola. J. Fluid Mech. 441, 315–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar