Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T00:08:43.168Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Linear stability of slip pipe flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2021

Kaiwen Chen  and
Baofang Song Open the ORCID record for Baofang Song [Opens in a new window]
Kaiwen Chen
Affiliation:
Center for Applied Mathematics, Tianjin University, Tianjin300072, PR China
Baofang Song*
Affiliation:
Center for Applied Mathematics, Tianjin University, Tianjin300072, PR China
*
†Email address for correspondence: baofang_song@tju.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We investigated the linear stability of pipe flow with anisotropic slip length at the wall by considering streamwise and azimuthal slip separately as the limiting cases. Our numerical analysis shows that streamwise slip renders the flow less stable but does not cause instability. The exponential decay rate of the least stable mode appears to be $\propto Re^{-1}$ when the Reynolds number is sufficiently large. Azimuthal slip can cause linear instability if the slip length is sufficiently large. The critical Reynolds number can be reduced to a few hundred given large slip lengths. In addition to numerical calculations, we present a proof of the linear stability of the flow to three-dimensional yet streamwise-independent disturbances for arbitrary Reynolds number and slip length, as an alternative to the usual energy analysis. Meanwhile we derived analytical solutions to the eigenvalue and eigenvector, and explained the structure of the spectrum and the dependence of the leading eigenvalue on the slip length. The scaling of the exponential decay rate of streamwise independent modes is shown to be rigorously $\propto Re^{-1}$. Our non-modal analysis shows that overall streamwise slip reduces the non-modal growth, and azimuthal slip has the opposite effect. Nevertheless, both slip cases still give the $Re^2$-scaling of the maximum non-modal growth and the most amplified disturbances are still streamwise rolls, which are qualitatively the same as in the no-slip case.

JFM classification

Instability: Instability
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 910 , 10 March 2021 , A35
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Asmolov, E.S. & Vinogradova, O.I. 2012 Effective slip boundary conditions for arbitrary one-dimensional surfaces. J. Fluid Mech. 706, 108–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avila, K., Moxey, D., De Lozar, A., Avila, M., Barkley, D. & Hof, B. 2011 The onset of turbulence in pipe flow. Science 333, 192–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bazant, M.Z. & Vinogradova, O.I. 2008 Tensorial hydrodynamic slip. J. Fluid Mech. 613, 125–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belyaev, A.V. & Vinogradova, O.I. 2010 Effective slip in pressure-driven flow past super-hydrophobic stripes. J. Fluid Mech. 652, 489–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, L. 2014 The lift-up effect: the linear mechanism behind transition and turbulence in shear flows. Eur. J. Mech. Fluids 47, 80–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chai, C. & Song, B. 2019 Stability of slip channel flow revisited. Phys. Fluids 31, 084105.Google Scholar
Chattopadhyay, G., Usha, R. & Sahu, K.C. 2017 Core-annular miscible two-fluid flow in a slippery pipe: a stability analysis. Phys. Fluids 29, 097106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Q., Wei, D. & Zhang, Z. 2019 Linear stability of pipe Poiseuille flow at high Reynolds number regime. arXiv:1910.14245v1 [math.AP].Google Scholar
Drazin, P.G.A. & Reid, W.H. 1981 Hydrodynamic Stability. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eckhardt, B., Schneider, T.M., Hof, B. & Westerweel, J. 2007 Turbulence transition in pipe flow. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 39, 447–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gan, C.-J. & Wu, Z.-N. 2006 Short-wave instability due to wall slip and numerical observation of wall-slip instability for microchannel flows. J. Fluid Mech. 550, 289–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghosh, S., Usha, R. & Sahu, K.C. 2014 Linear stability analysis of miscible two-fluid flow in a channel with velocity slip at the walls. Phys. Fluids 26, 014107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herron, I.H. 1991 Observations on the role of vorticity in the stability theory of wall bounded flows. Stud. Appl. Maths 85, 269–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herron, I.H. 2017 A unified solution of several classical hydrodynamic stability problems. Q. Appl. Maths LXXVI, 1–17.Google Scholar
Hu, H.H. & Joseph, D.D. 1989 Lubricated pipelining: stability of core-annular flow. Part 2. J. Fluid Mech. 205, 359–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, D.D. 1997 Core-annular flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 29, 65–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, D.D. & Hung, W. 1971 Contributions to the nonlinear theory of stability of viscous flow in pipes and between rotating cylinders. Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 44, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauga, E. & Cossu, C. 2005 A note on the stability of slip channel flows. Phys. Fluids 17, 088106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lecoq, N., Anthore, R., Cichocki, B., Szymczak, P. & Feuillebois, F. 2004 Drag force on a sphere moving towards a corrugated wall. J. Fluid Mech. 513, 247–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C., Choi, C.-H. & Jim, C.-J 2008 Structured surfaces for a giant liquid slip. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 064501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, C. & Jim, C.-J 2009 Maximizing the giant liquid slip on superhydrophobic microstructures by nanostructuring their sidewalls. Langmuir 25, 12812.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, J. & Renardy, Y. 1999 Direct simulation of unsteady axisymmetric core–annular flow with high viscosity ratio. J. Fluid Mech. 391, 123–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meseguer, A. & Trefethen, L.N. 2003 Linearized pipe flow to Reynolds number $10^7$. J. Comput. Phys. 186, 178–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Min, T. & Kim, J. 2005 Effects of hydrophobic surface on stability and transition. Phys. Fluids 17, 108106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ng, C.-O. & Wang, C.Y. 2009 Stokes shear flow over a grating: implications for superhydrophobic slip. Phys. Fluids 21, 013602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pralits, J.O., Alinovi, E. & Bottaro, A. 2017 Stability of the flow in a plane microchannel with one or two superhydrophobic walls. Phys. Rev. Fluids 2, 013901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Průša, V. 2009 On the influence of boundary condition on stability of Hagen–Poiseuille flow. Comput. Maths Appl. 57, 763–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ren, L., Chen, J.-G. & Zhu, K.-Q. 2008 Dule role of wall slip on linear stability of plane Poiseuille flow. Chin. Phys. Lett. 26, 601–603.Google Scholar
Rothstein, J.P. 2010 Slip on superhydrophobic surfaces. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 42, 89–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahu, K.C. 2016 Double-diffusive instability in core–annular pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 789, 830–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, P.J. 2007 Nonmodal stability theory. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 39, 129–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, P.J. & Henningson, D.S. 1994 Optimal energy density growth in Hagen–Poiseuille flow. J. Fluid Mech. 277, 197–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selvam, B., Merk, S., Govindarajan, R. & Meiburg, E. 2007 Stability of miscible core-annular flows with viscoisity stratification. J. Fluid Mech. 592, 23–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seo, J. & Mani, A. 2016 On the scaling of the slip velocity in turbulent flows over superhydrophobic surfaces. Phys. Fluids 28, 025110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, H.B. 1933 On the stability of three dimensional disturbances of viscous flow between parallel walls. Proc. R. Soc. A 142, 621–638.Google Scholar
Trefethen, L.N. 2000 Spectral Methods in Matlab. SIAM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinogradova, O.I. 1999 Slippage of water over hydrophobic surfaces. Intl J. Miner. Process. 56, 31–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voronov, R.S., Papavassiliou, D.V. & Lee, L.L. 2008 Review of fluid slip over superhydrophobic surfaces and its dependence on the contact angle. Ind. Engng Chem. Res. 47, 2455–2477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar