Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:42:26.680Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New perspectives in the use of the Ffowcs Williams–Hawkings equation for aeroacoustic analysis of rotating blades

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2021

S. Ianniello
S. Ianniello*
Affiliation:
INSEAN – The Italian Ship Model Basin, Roma, Italy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Ffowcs Williams–Hawkings equation represents a standard approach in the prediction of noise from rotating blades. It is widely used for linear aeroacoustic problems concerning helicopter rotors and aircraft propellers and over the last few years, through the use of the so called porous (or permeable) surface formulation, has replaced the Kirchhoff approach in the numerical solution of nonlinear problems. Nevertheless, because of numerical difficulties in evaluating the contribution from supersonic sources, most of the computing tools are still unable to treat the critical velocities at which the shock delocalization occurs. At those conditions, the attention is usually limited to the comparison between the noise prediction and the experimental data in the narrow time region where the pressure peak value is located, but there has been little attention paid to the singular behaviour of the governing equation at supersonic speeds. The aim of this paper is to couple the advantages of the porous formulation to an emission surface integration scheme in order to show if and how the singularities affect the noise prediction and to demonstrate a practical way to remove them. Such an analysis enables an investigation of some interesting and somewhat hidden features of the numerical solution of the governing equation and suggests a new solution approach to predicting the noise of a rotor at any rotational velocity.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 570 , 10 January 2007 , pp. 79 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Amiet, R. K. 1988 Thickness noise of a propeller and its relation to blade sweep. J. Fluid Mech. 192, 535–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brentner, K. S. 1997 An efficient and robust method for predicting helicopter rotor high-speed impulsive noise. J. Sound Vib. 203, 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brentner, K. S. & Farassat, F. 1997 An analytical comparison of the acoustic analogy and Kirchhoff formulation for moving surfaces. AIAA J. 202, 491–509.Google Scholar
Brentner, K. S. & Farassat, F. 2003 Modeling aerodynamically generated sound of helicopter rotors. Prog. Aerospace Sci. 39, 83–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delrieux, Y., Prieur, J., Rahier, G. & Drousie, G. 2003 A new implementation of aeroacoustic integral method for supersonic deformable control surface. AIAA Paper 2003–3201.Google Scholar
Di Francescantonio, P. 1997 A new boundary integral formulation for the prediction of sound radiation. J. Sound Vib. 202, 491–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farassat, F. 1981 Linear acoustic formulas for calculation of rotating blade noise. AIAA J. 19, 1122–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farassat, F. & Brentner, K. S. 1988 The uses and abuses of the acoustic analogy in helicopter rotor noise prediction. J. Am. Helicopter Soc. 33, 29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farassat, F. & Brentner, K. S. 1998a Supersonic quadrupole noise theory for high-speed helicopter noise. J. Sound Vib. 218, 481–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farassat, F. & Brentner, K. S. 1998b A study of supersonic surface sources – the Ffowcs Williams-Hawkings equation and the Kirchhoff formula. AIAA Paper 98-2375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farassat, F. & Farris, M. 1999 Verification and analysis of formulation 4 of Langley for the study of noise from high speed surfaces. AIAA Paper 99–1881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farassat, F. & Myers, M. K. 1988 Extension of Kirchhoff's formula to radiation from moving bodies. J. Sound Vib. 123, 451–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farassat, F., Pegg, R. J. & Hilton, D. A. 1975 Thickness noise of helicopter rotors at high tip speed. AIAA Paper 75–423.Google Scholar
Farassat, F., Padula, S. L. & Dunn, M. H. 1987 Advanced turboprop noise prediction based on recent theoretical results. J. Sound Vib. 119, 53–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ffowcs Williams, J. E. & Hawkings, D. L. 1969 Sound generation by turbulence and surfaces in arbitrary motion. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 264, 321–342.Google Scholar
Ianniello, S. 1999a An algorithm to integrate the FW-H equation on a supersonic rotating domain. AIAA J. 37, 1040–1047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ianniello, S. 1999b Quadrupole noise predictions through the Ffowcs Williams–Hawkings equation. AIAA J. 37, 1048–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ianniello, S. 2001 Aeroacoustic analysis of high tip-speed rotating blades. J. Aerospace Sci. Tech. 5, 179–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ianniello, S. & De Bernardis, E. 1994 Calculation of high speed noise from helicopter rotors using different descriptions of quadrupole source. AGARD Symp. on Aerodynamics and Aeroacoustics of Rotorcraft, Paper 27.Google Scholar
Kuntz, M., Lohmann, D., Lieser, J. A. & Pahlke, K. 1995 Comparisons of rotor noise predictions obtained by a lifting surface method and Euler solutions using Kirchhoff equation. AIAA Paper 95–136.Google Scholar
Lyrintzis, A. S. 1994 Review, the use of Kirchhoff's method in computational aeroacoustics. Trans. ASME: J. Fluids Engng 116, 665–676.Google Scholar
Morgans, A. S., Karabasov, S. A., Dowling, A. P. & Hynes, T. P. 2005 Transonic helicopter noise. AIAA J. 43, 1512–1524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purcell, T. W. 1988 CFD and transonic helicopter sound. 14th European Rotorcraft Forum, Paper 2.Google Scholar
Strawn, R. C., Biswas, R. & Lyrintzis, A. S. 1996 Helicopter noise predictions using Kirchhoff methods. IMACS J. Comput. Acoust. 4, 321–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, V. L. 1988 Analysis of the acoustic planform method for rotor noise prediction. AIAA J. 26, 522–523.Google Scholar
Wells, V. L. 1991 Acoustic waveform singularities from supersonic rotating surface sources. AIAA J. 29, 387–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, V. L. & Han, A. 1993 Geometrical and numerical considerations in computing advanced-propeller noise. J. Aircraft 30, 365–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Y. H., Caradonna, F. X. & Schmitz, F. H. 1978 The influence of the transonic flow field on high-speed helicopter impulsive noise. 4th European Rotorcraft and Powered Lift Aircraft Forum, Paper 58.Google Scholar