Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T21:51:56.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Numerical investigation of semifilled-pipe flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2021

Julian Brosda  and
Michael Manhart Open the ORCID record for Michael Manhart [Opens in a new window]
Julian Brosda
Affiliation:
Professorship for Hydromechanics, Technische Universität München, Arcisstr. 21, 80333 München, Germany
Michael Manhart*
Affiliation:
Professorship for Hydromechanics, Technische Universität München, Arcisstr. 21, 80333 München, Germany
*
†Email address for correspondence: michael.manhart@tum.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study describes turbulent flow in a semifilled pipe with a focus on its secondary currents. To the authors’ knowledge, we provide the first highly resolved data-set for semifilled-pipe flow using direct numerical simulation. The flow parameters range from $Re_\tau =115$, just maintaining turbulence, to moderate turbulent flow at $Re_\tau =460$. Some of the main flow characteristics are in line with previously published results from experiments, such as the velocity-dip phenomenon, the main secondary flow and the qualitative distribution of the Reynolds stresses in the core of the flow. We observe some flow phenomena which have not yet been reported in the literature so far for this type of flow. Among those is the inner secondary cell in the mixed corner between the free surface and the pipe's wall, which plays a major role in the distribution of the wall shear stress along the perimeter. We observe that the position and extension of the inner vortex scale with the wall shear stress and those of the outer vortex scale with outer variables. For the first time, we present and discuss distributions of the complete Reynolds stress tensor and its anisotropy which gives rise to the generation of mean streamwise vorticity in a small region in the mixed corners of the pipe. Mean secondary kinetic energy, however, is generated at the free surface around the stagnation point between the inner and outer vortices. This generation mechanism is in line with a vortex dynamics mechanism proposed in the literature.

JFM classification

Turbulent Flows: Pipe flow Turbulent Flows: Turbulent boundary layers Waves/Free-surface Flows: Channel flow
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 932 , 10 February 2022 , A25
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alfredsson, P.H., Johansson, A.V., Haritonidis, J.H. & Eckelmann, H. 1988 The fluctuating wall-shear stress and the velocity field in the viscous sublayer. Phys. Fluids 31, 1026–1033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiu, C.L. & Said, C.A.A. 1995 Maximum and mean velocities and entropy in open-channel flow. J. Hydraul. Engng ASCE 121 (1), 26–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, S.P. & Kehler, N. 2011 Turbulent flow characteristics in circular corrugated culverts at mild slopes. J. Hydraul Res. 49 (5), 676–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demuren, A.O. & Rodi, W. 1984 Calculation of turbulence-driven secondary motion in non-circular ducts. J. Fluid Mech. 140 (-1), 189–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einstein, H.A. & Li, H. 1958 Secondary currents in straight channels. EOS Trans. AGU 39 (6), 1085–1088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Khoury, G.K., Andersson, H.I. & Pettersen, B. 2012 Wakes behind a prolate spheroid in crossflow. J. Fluid Mech. 701, 98–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Khoury, G.K., Schlatter, P., Noorani, A., Fischer, P.F., Brethouwer, G. & Johansson, A.V. 2013 Direct numerical simulation of turbulent pipe flow at moderately high Reynolds numbers. Flow Turbul. Combust. 91 (3), 475–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emory, M.R. & Iaccarino, G. 2014 Visualizing turbulence anisotropy in the spatial domain with componentality contours by. In Annual Research Briefs (ed. P. Moin & J. Urzay), pp. 123–138. Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Feldmann, D., Bauer, C. & Wagner, C. 2018 Computational domain length and Reynolds number effects on large-scale coherent motions in turbulent pipe flow. J. Turbul. 19 (3), 274–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gessner, F.B. 1973 The origin of secondary flow in turbulent flow along a corner. J. Fluid Mech. 58 (01), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grega, L.M., Hsu, T.Y. & Wei, T. 2002 Vorticity transport in a corner formed by a solid wall and a free surface. J. Fluid Mech. 465, 331–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grega, L.M., Wei, T., Leighton, R.I. & Neves, J.C. 1995 Turbulent mixed-boundary flow in a corner formed by a solid wall and a free surface. J. Fluid Mech. 294, 17–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, F., Andersson, H.I., Gallardo, J.P. & Okulov, V.L. 2016 On the peculiar structure of a helical wake vortex behind an inclined prolate spheroid. J. Fluid Mech. 801, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiménez, J. & Moin, P. 1991 The minimal flow unit in near-wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 225, 213–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joung, Y. & Choi, S.U. 2009 Direct numerical simulation of low Reynolds number flows in an open-channel with sidewalls. Intl J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 62, 854–874.Google Scholar
Kara, S., Stoesser, T. & Sturm, T.W. 2012 Turbulence statistics in compound channels with deep and shallow overbank flows. J. Hydraul Res. 50 (5), 482–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J., Moin, P. & Moser, R. 1987 Turbulence statistics in fully developed channel flow at low Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 177, 133–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, D.W. & Sterling, M. 2000 Boundary shear in circular pipes running partially full. J. Hydraul. Engng ASCE 126 (4), 263–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J., Suh, J., Sung, H.J. & Pettersen, B. 2012 Structures of turbulent open-channel flow in the presence of an air-water interface. J. Turbul. 13, N18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manhart, M. 2004 A zonal grid algorithm for DNS of turbulent boundary layers. Comput. Fluids 33, 435–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nezu, I. 2005 Open-channel flow turbulence and its research prospect in the 21st century. J. Hydraul. Engng ASCE 131 (4), 229–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nezu, I. & Nakagawa, H. 1993 Turbulence in Open-Channel Flows. A.A. Balkema.Google Scholar
Ng, H.C.-H., Collignon, E., Poole, R.J. & Dennis, D.J.C. 2021 Energetic motions in turbulent partially filled pipe flow. Phys. Fluids 33 (2), 025101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ng, H.C.-H., Cregan, H.L.F., Dodds, J.M., Poole, R.J. & Dennis, D.J.C. 2018 Partially filled pipes: experiments in laminar and turbulent flow. J. Fluid Mech. 848, 467–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikora, V. & Roy, A.G. 2012 Secondary flows in rivers: theoretical framework, recent advances and current challenges. In Gravel Bed Rivers: Processes, Tools, Environments (ed. M.A. Church, P. Biron, A.G. Roy & P. Ashmore), pp. 3–22. Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlandi, P. 1990 Vortex dipole rebound from a wall. Phys. Fluids A: Fluid Dyn. 2 (8), 1429–1436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peller, N. 2010 Numerische Simulation turbulenter Strömungen mit Immersed Boundaries. PhD thesis, Technische Universität München.Google Scholar
Peller, N., Le Duc, A., Tremblay, F. & Manhart, M. 2006 High-order stable interpolations for immersed boundary methods. Intl J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 52 (11), 1175–1193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinelli, A., Uhlmann, M., Sekimoto, A. & Kawahara, G. 2010 Reynolds number dependence of mean flow structure in square duct turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 644, 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirozzoli, S., Modesti, D., Orlandi, P. & Grasso, F. 2018 Turbulence and secondary motions in square duct flow. J. Fluid Mech. 840, 631–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, S.B. 2000 Turbulent Flows. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakai, Y. 2016 Coherent structures and secondary motions in open duct flow. PhD thesis, Karlsruher Institut für Technologie.Google Scholar
Schanderl, W., Jenssen, U., Strobl, C. & Manhart, M. 2017 The structure and budget of turbulent kinetic energy in front of a wall-mounted cylinder. J. Fluid Mech. 827, 285–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schanderl, W. & Manhart, M. 2016 Reliability of wall shear stress estimations of the flow around a wall-mounted cylinder. Comput. Fluids 128, 16–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlichting, H. & Gersten, K. 2017 Boundary-Layer Theory. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwertfirm, F. & Manhart, M. 2007 DNS of passive scalar transport in turbulent channel flow at high Schmidt numbers. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 28 (6), 1204–1214, revised and extended papers from the 5th conference in Turbulence, Heat and Mass Transfer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tominaga, A., Nezu, I., Ezaki, K. & Nakagawa, H. 1989 Three-dimensional turbulent structure in straight open channel flows. J. Hydraul Res. 27 (1), 149–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhlmann, M., Pinelli, A., Kawahara, G. & Sekimoto, A. 2007 Marginally turbulent flow in a square duct. J. Fluid Mech. 588, 153–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vreman, A.W. & Kuerten, J.G.M. 2014 Comparison of direct numerical simulatino databases of turbulent channel flow at $Re_{\tau }=180$. Phys. Fluids 26, 015102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, S.Q. & Lim, S.Y. 1997 Mechanism of energy transportation and turbulent flow in a 3D channel. J. Hydraul. Engng ASCE 123 (8), 684–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, S.Q., Tan, S.K. & Wang, X.K. 2012 Mechanism of secondary currents in open channel flows. J. Geophys. Res. 117 (F4), F04014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoon, J.I., Sung, J. & Ho Lee, M. 2012 Velocity profiles and friction coefficients in circular open channels. J. Hydraul Res. 50 (3), 304–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagarola, M.V. & Smits, A.J. 1997 Scaling of the mean velocity profile for turbulent pipe flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 239–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zampiron, A., Cameron, S. & Nikora, V. 2020 Secondary currents and very-large-scale motions in open-channel flow over streamwise ridges. J. Fluid Mech. 887, A17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar