Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:37:38.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Obliquely interacting solitary waves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2006

John W. Miles
Affiliation:
Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California, San Diego

Abstract

Nonlinear oblique interactions between two slightly dispersive gravity waves (in particular, solitary waves) of dimensionless amplitudes α1 and α2 (relative to depth) and relative inclination 2ϕ (between wave normals) are classified as weak if sin2ϕ α1,2 or strong if ϕ2 = O1,2). Weak interactions permit superposition of the individual solutions of the Korteweg-de Vries equation in first approximation; the interaction term, which is O1α2), then is determined from these basic solutions.

Strong interactions are intrinsically nonlinear. It is shown that these interactions are phase-conserving (the sum of the phases of the incoming waves is equal to the sum of the phases of the outgoing waves) if |α21 > (2ϕ)2 but not if |α21| (2ϕ)2 (e.g. the reflexion problem, for which the interacting waves are images and α2 = α1). It also is shown that the interactions are singular, in the sense that regular incoming waves with sech2 profiles yield singular outgoing waves with - csch2 profiles, if \[ \psi_{-}< |\psi| < \psi_{+},\quad{\rm where}\quad\psi_{\pm}={\textstyle\frac{1}{2}}\left|(3\alpha_2)^{\frac{1}{2}}\pm(3\alpha_1)^{\frac{1}{2}}\right|. \]

Regular interactions appear to be impossible within this singular regime, and its end points, |ϕ| = ϕ±, are associated with resonant interactions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1977 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benney, D. J. & Luke, J. C. 1964 On the interactions of permanent waves of finite amplitude. J. Math. & Phys. 43, 309313.Google Scholar
Byatt-Smith, J. G. B. 1971 An integral equation for unsteady surface waves and a comment on the Boussinesq equation. J. Fluid Mech. 49, 625633.Google Scholar
Chen, H.-H. 1975 A Bäcklund transformation in two dimensions. J. Math. Phys. 16, 23822384.Google Scholar
Gwyther, R. F. 1900 The general motion of long waves, with an examination of the direct reflexion of a solitary wave. Phil. Mag. 50 (5), 349–352.Google Scholar
Laitone, E. V. 1960 The second approximation to cnoidal and solitary waves. J. Fluid Mech. 9, 430444.Google Scholar
Lin, C. C. & Clark, A. 1959 On the theory of shallow water waves. Tsing Hua J. Chinese Studies, 1, 5462.Google Scholar
Long, R. R. 1964 The initial-value problem for long waves of finite amplitude. J. Fluid Mech. 20, 161170.Google Scholar
Meyer, R. E. 1963 On the interaction of solitary waves. Progress in Applied Mechanics (The Prager Anniversary Volume), pp. 17–21. Macmillan.
Moses, H. E. 1976 A solution of the Korteweg–deVries equation in a half-space bounded by a wall. J. Math. Phys. 17, 7375.Google Scholar
Oikawa, M. & Yajima, N. 1973 Interactions of solitary waves – a perturbation approach to nonlinear systems. J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 34, 10931099.Google Scholar
Satsuma, J. 1976 N-soliton solution of the two-dimensional Korteweg–deVries equation. J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 40, 286290.
Scott, A. C., Chu, F. Y. F. & McLaughlin, D. W. 1973 The soliton: a new concept in applied science. Proc. I.E.E.E. 61, 14431483.Google Scholar
Scott Russell, J. 1844 Report on waves. Report of the 14th Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, York, pp. 311–390, plates XLVII–LVII. London: John Murray (1845).
Whitham, G. B. 1974 Linear and Nonlinear Waves. Wiley.
Wiegel, R. L. 1964 Oceanographical Engineering. Prentice-Hall.