Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T22:40:42.647Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the criteria of large cavitation bubbles in a tube during a transient process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2021

Peng Xu ,
Shuhong Liu ,
Zhigang Zuo  and
Zhao Pan Open the ORCID record for Zhao Pan [Opens in a new window]
Peng Xu
Affiliation:
Department of Energy and Power Engineering, and State Key Laboratory of Hydro Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing100084, PR China Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, University of Waterloo, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, OntarioN2L 3G1, Canada
Shuhong Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Energy and Power Engineering, and State Key Laboratory of Hydro Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing100084, PR China
Zhigang Zuo*
Affiliation:
Department of Energy and Power Engineering, and State Key Laboratory of Hydro Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing100084, PR China
Zhao Pan*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, University of Waterloo, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, OntarioN2L 3G1, Canada
*
†Email addresses for correspondence: zhigang200@tsinghua.edu.cn, zhao.pan@uwaterloo.ca
†Email addresses for correspondence: zhigang200@tsinghua.edu.cn, zhao.pan@uwaterloo.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Extreme cavitation scenarios, such as water column separations in hydraulic systems during transient processes caused by large cavitation bubbles, can lead to catastrophic destruction. In the present paper, we study the onset criteria and dynamics of large cavitation bubbles in a tube. A new cavitation number $Ca_2 = {l^*}^{-1} Ca_0$ is proposed to describe the maximum length $L_{max}$ of the cavitation bubble, where $l^*$ is a non-dimensional length of the water column indicating its slenderness, and $Ca_0$ is the classic cavitation number. Combined with the onset criteria for acceleration-induced cavitation ($Ca_1<1$, Pan et al., Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 114, 2017, pp. 8470–8474), we show that the occurrence of large cylindrical cavitation bubbles requires both $Ca_2<1$ and $Ca_1<1$ simultaneously. We also establish a Rayleigh-type model for the dynamics of large cavitation bubbles in a tube. The bubbles collapse at a finite end speed, and the time from the maximum bubble size to collapse is $T_c=\sqrt {2}\sqrt {lL_{max}}\sqrt {{\rho }/{p_\infty }}$, where $l$ is the length of the water column, $L_{max}$ is the maximum bubble length, $\rho$ is the liquid density and $p_{\infty }$ is the reference pressure in the far field. The analytical results are validated against systematic experiments using a modified ‘tube-arrest’ apparatus, which can decouple acceleration and velocity. The results in the current work can guide design and operation of hydraulic systems encountering transient processes.

JFM classification

Drops and Bubbles: Cavitation Drops and Bubbles: Bubble dynamics
Type
JFM Rapids
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 913 , 25 April 2021 , R6
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adamkowski, A. & Lewandowski, M. 2015 Cavitation characteristics of shutoff valves in numerical modeling of transients in pipelines with column separation. ASCE J. Hydraul. Engng 141 (2), 04014077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avellan, F. 2004 Introduction to cavitation in hydraulic machinery. Tech. Rep. Politehnica University of Timişoara.Google Scholar
Benjamin, T.B. & Ellis, A.T. 1966 The collapse of cavitation bubbles and the pressures thereby produced against solid boundaries. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 260, 221–240.Google Scholar
Bergant, A. & Simpson, A.R. 1999 Pipeline column separation flow regimes. ASCE J. Hydraul. Engng 125 (8), 835–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergant, A., Simpson, A.R. & Tijsseling, A.S. 2006 Water hammer with column separation: a historical review. J. Fluid Struct. 22 (2), 135–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonin, C.C. 1960 Water-hammer damage to Oigawa power station. Trans. ASME: J. Engng Power 82 (2), 111–116.Google Scholar
Chen, Q. & Wang, L. 2004 Production of large size single transient cavitation bubbles with tube arrest method. Chin. Phys. 13 (4), 564–570.Google Scholar
Chesterman, W.D. 1952 The dynamics of small transient cavities. J. Fluid Mech. 65 (11), 846–858.Google Scholar
Escaler, X., Egusquiza, E., Farhat, M., Avellan, F. & Coussirat, M. 2006 Detection of cavitation in hydraulic turbines. Mech. Syst. Signal Pr. 20 (4), 983–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillgren, N. 2011 Analysis of Hydraulic Pressure Transients in the Waterways of Hydropower Stations, 1st edn. Uppsala Universitet.Google Scholar
Karadžić, U., Bulatović, V. & Bergant, A. 2014 Valve-induced water hammer and column separation in a pipeline apparatus. Strojniški vestnik – J. Mech. Engng 60 (11), 742–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, K., Yang, F., Yang, Z., Zhu, Y. & Cheng, Y. 2019 Runner lifting-up during load rejection transients of a Kaplan turbine: flow mechanism and solution. Energies 12 (24), 4781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, X., Ji, B. & Tsujimoto, Y. 2016 A review of cavitation in hydraulic machinery. J. Hydrodyn. 28 (3), 335–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onuki, H., Oi, Y. & Tagawa, Y. 2018 Microjet generator for highly viscous fluids. Phys. Rev. Appl. 9 (1), 014035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ory, E., Yuan, H., Prosperetti, A., Popinet, S. & Zaleski, S. 2000 Growth and collapse of a vapor bubble in a narrow tube. Phys. Fluids 12 (6), 1268–1277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pan, Z., Kiyama, A., Tagawa, Y., Daily, D.J., Thomson, S.L., Hurd, R. & Truscott, T.T. 2017 Cavitation onset caused by acceleration. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114 (32), 8470–8474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pejovic, S., Karney, B. & Zhang, Q. 2004 Water column separation in long tailrace tunnel. In Hydroturbo 2004, International Conference on Hydro-Power Engineering, Brno, Czech Republic, October, pp. 18–22.Google Scholar
Simpson, A.R. & Wylie, E.B. 1991 Large water-hammer pressures for column separation in pipelines. ASCE J. Hydraul. Engng 117 (10), 1310–1316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, C., Can, E., Dijkink, R., Lohse, D. & Prosperetti, A. 2009 Growth and collapse of a vapour bubble in a microtube: the role of thermal effects. J. Fluid Mech. 632, 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torre, L., Cervone, A., Pasini, A. & d'Agostino, L. 2011 Experimental characterization of thermal cavitation effects on space rocket axial inducers. Trans. ASME; J. Fluids Engng 133 (11), 111303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, Z., Prosperetti, A. & Kim, J. 2004 Bubble growth on an impulsively powered microheater. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 47 (5), 1053–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, X., Cheng, Y., Xia, L. & Yang, J. 2016 CFD simulation of reverse water-hammer induced by collapse of draft-tube cavity in a model pump-turbine during runaway process. IOP Conf. 49 (5), 052017.Google Scholar

Xu et al. supplementary movie 1

See pdf file for movie caption

Download Xu et al. supplementary movie 1(Video)
Video 7.6 MB

Xu et al. supplementary movie 2

See pdf file for movie caption

Download Xu et al. supplementary movie 2(Video)
Video 488.9 KB

Xu et al. supplementary movie 3

See pdf file for movie caption

Download Xu et al. supplementary movie 3(Video)
Video 212.6 KB

Xu et al. supplementary movie 4

See pdf file for movie caption

Download Xu et al. supplementary movie 4(Video)
Video 6.6 MB
Supplementary material: PDF

Xu et al. supplementary material

Captions for movies 1-4

Download Xu et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 74.8 KB