Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:41:42.824Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the flow-acoustic coupling of fan blades with over-the-rotor liner

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2022

Yu Sun Open the ORCID record for Yu Sun [Opens in a new window] ,
Xiaoyu Wang Open the ORCID record for Xiaoyu Wang [Opens in a new window] ,
Lin Du  and
Xiaofeng Sun
Yu Sun
Affiliation:
School of Energy and Power Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 102206, PR China
Xiaoyu Wang*
Affiliation:
Research Institute of Aero-Engine, Beihang University, Beijing 102206, PR China
Lin Du
Affiliation:
Research Institute of Aero-Engine, Beihang University, Beijing 102206, PR China
Xiaofeng Sun
Affiliation:
School of Energy and Power Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 102206, PR China Research Institute of Aero-Engine, Beihang University, Beijing 102206, PR China
*
†Email address for correspondence: bhwxy@buaa.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Over-the-rotor liner exhibits the potential to further attenuate turbofan noise, but the physics involved remain to be explored. In this paper, a three-dimensional coupled singularity method is proposed to investigate the flow-acoustic coupling effects of axially overlapping annular rotor and finite-length liner in subsonic flow. The formulation adopts the orthogonal basis expansion of the generated disturbances in terms of the hard-walled duct modes. The sound scatterings at the rotor and the liner are then characterized, respectively, by the underdetermined dipole and monopole distributions. We derive a simultaneous solution to the coupled unsteady rotor and liner responses, which ensures that the resultant perturbed field satisfies both the impermeable boundary condition on the blade surfaces and the impedance boundary condition on the lined wall. The effect of a perforated porous-material liner on the wake–rotor interaction tones is investigated. The analysis reveals that for the sound field of varying mode and frequency characteristics, moving the inlet liner to the over-the-rotor location generally leads to limited loss or even an increase of upstream sound absorption, along with additional acoustic benefits in the aft duct. The flow-acoustic coupling between the axially overlapping rotor and liner is shown to alleviate significantly the unsteady blade loading and meanwhile intensify the fluid particle oscillation through the acoustically treated wall. Sound source reduction and sound dissipation enhancement are thus identified as the governing noise attenuation mechanisms. Finally, we extend the analysis to provide insights into the effectiveness of over-the-rotor acoustic treatment with shortened axial length.

JFM classification

Acoustics: Aeroacoustics Acoustics: Noise control
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 941 , 25 June 2022 , A67
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aurégan, Y., Starobinski, R. & Pagneux, V. 2001 Influence of grazing flow and dissipation effects on the acoustic boundary conditions at a lined wall. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109 (1), 59–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bozak, R.F. & Dougherty, R.P. 2018 Measurement of noise reduction from acoustic casing treatments installed over a subscale high bypass ratio turbofan rotor. In 2018 AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference. AIAA Paper 2018-4099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bozak, R.F., Hughes, C.E. & Buckley, J. 2013 The aerodynamic performance of an over-the-rotor liner with circumferential grooves on a high bypass ratio turbofan rotor. NASA Tech. Rep. NASA/TM-2013-218066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brambley, E.J. 2009 Fundamental problems with the model of uniform flow over acoustic linings. J. Sound Vib. 322 (4-5), 1026–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delany, M.E. & Bazley, E.N. 1970 Acoustical properties of fibrous absorbent materials. Appl. Acoust. 3 (2), 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, D.M., Woodward, R.P. & Podboy, G.G. 2009 Acoustic performance of novel fan noise reduction technologies for a high bypass model turbofan at simulated flight conditions. In 15th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (30th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference). AIAA Paper 2009-3140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evers, I. & Peake, N. 2002 On sound generation by the interaction between turbulence and a cascade of airfoils with non-uniform mean flow. J. Fluid Mech. 463, 25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eversman, W. 2003 Turbofan noise propagation and radiation at high frequencies. NASA Tech. Rep. NASA/CR-2003-212323.Google Scholar
Gazella, M.R., Takakura, T., Sutliff, D.L., Bozak, R. & Tester, B.J. 2017 Evaluating the acoustic benefits of over-the-rotor acoustic treatments installed on the advanced noise control fan. In 23rd AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference. AIAA Paper 2017-3872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glauert, H. 1926 The Elements of Aerofoil and Airscrew Theory. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldstein, M. 1974 Unified approach to aerodynamic sound generation in the presence of solid boundaries. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 56 (2), 497–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, K.C. & Verdon, J.M. 1991 Gust response analysis for cascades operating in nonuniform mean flows. AIAA J. 29 (9), 1463–1471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, C.E. & Gazzaniga, J.A. 2009 Effect of two advanced noise reduction technologies on the aerodynamic performance of an ultra high bypass ratio fan. In 15th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (30th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference). AIAA Paper 2009-3139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, H., Lau, A. & Huang, X. 2018 Sound wave scattering in a flow duct with azimuthally non-uniform liners. J. Fluid Mech. 839, 644–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jing, X. & Sun, X. 2002 High-intensity sound absorption at an orifice with bias flow. J. Propul. Power 18 (3), 718–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jing, X., Sun, X., Wu, J. & Meng, K. 2001 Effect of grazing flow on the acoustic impedance of an orifice. AIAA J. 39 (8), 1478–1484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jing, X., Wang, X. & Sun, X. 2007 Broadband acoustic liner based on the mechanism of multiple cavity resonance. AIAA J. 45 (10), 2429–2437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaji, S. & Okazaki, T. 1970 Propagation of sound waves through a blade row: II. analysis based on the acceleration potential method. J. Sound Vib. 11 (3), 355–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, F. & Friedman, M. 1958 Theoretical investigation of subsonic oscillating blade-row aerodynamics. NACA Tech. Rep. TN 4136.Google Scholar
Liu, X., Jiang, H., Huang, X. & Chen, S. 2016 Theoretical model of scattering from flow ducts with semi-infinite axial liner splices. J. Fluid Mech. 786, 62–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lordi, J.A. & Homicz, G.F. 1981 Linearized analysis of the three-dimensional compressible flow through a rotating annular blade row. J. Fluid Mech. 103, 413–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morfey, C.L. 1971 Sound transmission and generation in ducts with flow. J. Sound Vib. 14 (1), 37–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Namba, M. 1975 Subsonic cascade flutter with finite mean lift. AIAA J. 13 (5), 586–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Namba, M. 1977 Three-dimensional analysis of blade force and sound generation for an annular cascade in distorted flows. J. Sound Vib. 50 (4), 479–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Namba, M. & Fukushige, K. 1980 Application of the equivalent surface source method to the acoustics of duct systems with non-uniform wall impedance. J. Sound Vib. 73 (1), 125–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noble, B. 1958 Methods Based on the Wiener–Hopf Technique for the Solution of Partial Differential Equations. Pergamon.Google Scholar
Palleja-Cabre, S., Tester, B.J., Astley, R.J. & Bozak, R. 2019 Modelling of over-the-rotor acoustic treatments for improved noise suppression in turbofan engines. In 25th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference. AIAA Paper 2019-2580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palleja-Cabre, S., Tester, B.J., Astley, R.J. & Beriot, H. 2020 Impedance modelling of acoustically treated circumferential grooves for over-tip-rotor fan noise suppression. Intl J. Aeroacoust. 19 (6–8), 277–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peake, N. 1992 The interaction between a high-frequency gust and a blade row. J. Fluid Mech. 241, 261–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peake, N. & Kerschen, E.J. 2004 Influence of mean loading on noise generated by the interaction of gusts with a cascade: downstream radiation. J. Fluid Mech. 515, 99–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posson, H., Moreau, S. & Roger, M. 2011 Broadband noise prediction of fan outlet guide vane using a cascade response function. J. Sound Vib. 330 (25), 6153–6183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posson, H., Roger, M. & Moreau, S. 2010 On a uniformly valid analytical rectilinear cascade response function. J. Fluid Mech. 663, 22–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renou, Y. & Aurégan, Y. 2011 Failure of the Ingard–Myers boundary condition for a lined duct: an experimental investigation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 130 (1), 52–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rienstra, S.W. & Eversman, W. 2001 A numerical comparison between the multiple-scales and finite-element solution for sound propagation in lined flow ducts. J. Fluid Mech. 437, 367–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulten, J.B.H.M. 1982 Sound generated by rotor wakes interacting with a leaned vane stator. AIAA J. 20 (10), 1352–1358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulten, J.B.H.M. 1997 Vane sweep effects on rotor/stator interaction noise. AIAA J. 35 (6), 945–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, R.A. 1946 The absorption of sound in a homogeneous porous medium. Proc. Phys. Soc. 58 (2), 165–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selamet, A., Xu, M.B., Lee, I.-J. & Huff, N.T. 2004 Analytical approach for sound attenuation in perforated dissipative silencers. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115 (5), 2091–2099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S.N. 1972 Discrete frequency sound generation in axial flow turbomachines. Tech. Rep. Reports and Memoranda No. 3709. University Engineering Dept., Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sun, X. & Kaji, S. 2000 Effects of wall admittance changes on aeroelastic stability of turbomachines. AIAA J. 38 (9), 1525–1533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, X. & Kaji, S. 2002 Control of blade flutter using casing with acoustic treatment. J. Fluids Struct. 16 (5), 627–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, X., Wang, X., Du, L. & Jing, X. 2008 A new model for the prediction of turbofan noise with the effect of locally and non-locally reacting liners. J. Sound Vib. 316 (1–5), 50–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, Y., Wang, X., Du, L. & Sun, X. 2020 a Effect of acoustic treatment on fan flutter stability. J. Fluids Struct. 93, 102877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, Y., Wang, X., Du, L. & Sun, X. 2020 b On the role of acoustic reflections from duct boundaries in fan flutter. J. Sound Vib. 483, 115465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutliff, D.L., Dougherty, R.P. & Walker, B.E. 2010 Evaluating the acoustic effect of over-the-rotor foam-metal liner installed on a low speed fan using virtual rotating microphone imaging. In 16th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference. AIAA Paper 2010-3800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutliff, D.L., Elliott, D.M., Jones, M.G. & Hartley, T.C. 2009 Attenuation of FJ44 turbofan engine noise with a foam-metal liner installed over-the-rotor. In 15th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (30th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference). AIAA-2009-3141; also NASA/TM-2009-215666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutliff, D.L. & Jones, M.G. 2009 Low-speed fan noise attenuation from a foam-metal liner. J. Aircraft 46 (4), 1381–1394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutliff, D.L., Jones, M.G. & Hartley, T.C. 2013 High-speed turbofan noise reduction using foam-metal liner over-the-rotor. J. Aircraft 50 (5), 1491–1503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, T. & Kaji, S. 1984 Possibility of cascade flutter suppression by use of non-rigid duct wall. In Proceeding of the Third International Symposium on Aeroelasticity in Turbomachinery (ed. D.S. Whitehead), pp. 261–276. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, W., Wang, X., Du, L. & Sun, X. 2019 Mutual effect between swept-and-leaned vanes and acoustic liners on fan interaction–noise reduction. AIAA J. 57 (6), 2479–2488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, W., Wang, X., Jing, X., Liang, A. & Sun, X. 2017 Three-dimensional analysis of vane sweep effects on fan interaction noise. J. Sound Vib. 391, 73–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, W., Wang, X. & Sun, X. 2015 Predictions of fan broadband noise using lifting surface method. AIAA J. 53 (10), 2845–2855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zorumski, W.E. 1974 Acoustic theory of axisymmetric multisectioned ducts. NASA Tech. Rep. TR R-419.Google Scholar