Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:01:07.883Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pore-scale investigation of immiscible displacement process in porous media under high-frequency sound waves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2011

KHOSROW NADERI
Affiliation:
University of Alberta, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, School of Mining and Petroleum Engineering, 3-112 Markin CNRL-NREF, Edmonton, AB T6G 2W2, Canada
TAYFUN BABADAGLI*
Affiliation:
University of Alberta, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, School of Mining and Petroleum Engineering, 3-112 Markin CNRL-NREF, Edmonton, AB T6G 2W2, Canada
*
Email address for correspondence: tayfun@ualberta.ca

Abstract

Although experimental and theoretical studies have been performed to identify the effects of elastic waves on multi-phase flow in porous structures, the literature lacks finely tuned experiments at the micro-scale. This paper reports observations and critical analysis of immiscible displacement in micro-scale porous media under ultrasonic energy. A number of experiments are performed on homogeneous and heterogeneous micromodels for varying wave frequency and power, initial water saturation, wettability and injection rates. We show that ultrasonic radiation influences the displacement pattern and yields lower residual non-wetting phase (oil) behind when low injection rates are applied. Higher wave frequency results in faster recovery of oil, but the ultimate recovery is controlled mainly by wave intensity. The presence of initial water saturation has a positive effect on the displacement, especially in an oil-wet medium. Of the possible mechanisms suggested for recovery enhancement under ultrasonic radiation, deformation of pore walls and change in fluid properties due to heating are not an issue in these experiments but other mechanisms including coalescence of oil droplets under oscillation, reduction of wetting films, adherence to grains and the peristaltic movement of fluids due to mechanical vibration were observed to be effective and are discussed in the analysis of the visual observations.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aarts, A. C. T. & Ooms, G. 1998. Net flow of compressible viscous liquids induced by traveling waves in porous media. J. Engng Math. 34 (4), 435450.Google Scholar
Aarts, A. C. T., Ooms, G., Bil, K. J. & Bot, E. T. G. 1999 Enhancement of liquid flow through a porous medium by ultrasonic radiation. SPE J. 4 (4), 321327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beresnev, I. A. & Johnson, P. A. 1994 Elastic-wave stimulation of oil production – a review of methods and results. Geophysics 59 (6), 10001017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beresnev, I. A., Vigil, R. D. & Li, W. 2005 The mechanism of recovery of residual oil by elastic waves and vibrations. SEG Expanded Abstracts 24, 13861390.Google Scholar
Beresnev, I. A., Li, W. & Vigil, R. D. 2009 Condition for break-up of non-wetting fluids in sinusoidally constricted capillary channels. Trans. Porous Med. 80, 581604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjerknes, V. F. K. 1906 Fields of Force. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Blake, F. G. 1949 Bjerknes forces in stationary sound fields. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 21 (5), 551551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherskiy, N. V., Tsarev, V. P., Konovalov, V. M., & Kusnetsov, O. L. 1977 The effect of ultrasound on permeability of rocks to water. Transactions (Doklady) of the U.S.S.R. Academy of Sciences. Earth Sci. Sec. 232, 201204.Google Scholar
Dezhkunov, N. V. & Leighton, T. G. 2004 Study into correlation between the ultrasonic capillary effect and sonoluminescence. J. Engng Phys. Thermophys. 77 (1), 5361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duhon, R. D. & Campbell, J. M. 1965 The effect of ultrasonic energy on the flow of fluids in porous media. In The Second Annual Eastern Regional Meeting of SPE/AIME, Charleston, WV, 4–5 November. SPE 1316.Google Scholar
Gadiev, S. M. 1977 Use of Vibrations in Oil Production (Ispol'zovaniye Vibratsii v Dobyche Nefti). Nedra Press.Google Scholar
Ganiev, R. F., Urainskii, L. E. & Frolov, K. V. 1989 Wave mechanism for the acceleration of a liquid flowing in capillaries and porous media. Sov. Phys. Dokl. 34, 267283.Google Scholar
Graham, D. R. 1997 Steady and oscillatory flow through model porous media. MSc thesis, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Graham, D. R. 1999 Acoustic stimulation of multiphase flow in porous media. PhD thesis, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Graham, D. R. & Higdon, J. J. L. 2000 a Oscillatory flow of droplets in capillary tubes. Part 1. Straight tubes. J. Fluid Mech. 425, 3153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, D. R. & Higdon, J. J. L. 2000 b Oscillatory flow of droplets in capillary tubes. Part 2. Constricted tubes. J. Fluid Mech. 425, 5577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, D. W. & Willhite, G. P. 1998 Enhanced Oil Recovery. Society of Petroleum Engineering.Google Scholar
Hamida, T. 2006 Effect of ultrasonic waves on immiscible and miscible displacement in porous media. MSc thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB.Google Scholar
Hamida, T. & Babadagli, T. 2005 Effects of ultrasonic waves on immiscible and miscible displacement in porous media. In 2005 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, 912 October. SPE 95327.Google Scholar
Hamida, T. & Babadagli, T. 2007 a Fluid–fluid interaction during miscible and immiscible displacement under ultrasonic waves. Eur. Phys. J. B 60, 447462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamida, T. & Babadagli, T. 2007 b Analysis of capillary interaction and oil recovery under ultrasonic waves. Trans. Porous Med. 70, 231255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamida, T. & Babadagli, T. 2008 a Effects of ultrasonic waves on the interfacial forces between oil and water. Ultrason. Sonochem. 15, 274278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamida, T. & Babadagli, T. 2008 b Displacement of oil by different interfacial tension fluids under ultrasonic waves. Colloids Surf. A 316, 176189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, M., Jirka, G. H. & Plate, E. J. 2000 Capillarity-induced resonance of oil blobs in capillary tubes and porous media. Geophysics 65 (3), 874883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iassonov, P. & Beresnev, I. 2008 Mobilization of entrapped organic fluids by elastic waves and vibrations. SPE J. 13 (4), 465473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klins, M. 1984 Carbon Dioxide Flooding. International Human Resources Development Corporation.Google Scholar
Kuznetsov, O. L., Simkin, E. M., Chilingar, G. V. & Katz, S. A. 1998 Improved oil recovery by application of vibro-energy to waterflooded sandstones. J. Petrol. Sci. Engng 19 (3–4), 191200.Google Scholar
Kuznetsov, O. L., Simkin, E. M., Chilingar, G. V., Gorfunkel, M. V. & Robertson, J. O. 2002 Seismic techniques of enhanced oil recovery: experimental and field results. Energy Sources 24 (9), 877889.Google Scholar
Li, W., Vigil, R. D., Beresnev, I. A., Iassonov, P. & Ewing, R. 2005 Vibration-induced mobilization of trapped oil ganglia in porous media: experimental validation of a capillary-physics mechanism. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 289 (1), 193199.Google Scholar
Malykh, N. V., Petrov, V. M. & Sankin, G. N. 2003 On sonocapillary effect. In Proc. Fifth World Congress on Ultrasonics (WCU' 03), Paris, France, 710 September, pp. 13431346.Google Scholar
Mettin, R., Akhatov, I., Parlitz, U., Ohl, C. D. & Lauterborn, W. 1997 Bjerknes forces between small cavitation bubbles in a strong acoustic field. Phys. Rev. E 56 (3), 29242931.Google Scholar
Morin, N. 2001 Hands-on Demonstration of Basic Processing. NanoFab, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB.Google Scholar
Naderi, K. 2008 Core and pore scale investigations on immiscible displacement and enhanced oil/heavy-oil recovery under ultrasonic waves. MSc thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB.Google Scholar
Naderi, K. & Babadagli, T. 2008 a Clarifications on oil/heavy oil recovery under ultrasonic radiation through core and 2-D visualization experiments. J. Can. Petrol. Technol. 47 (11), 5662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naderi, K. & Babadagli, T. 2008 b Effect of ultrasonic intensity and frequency on oil/heavy-oil recovery from different wettability rocks. In Proc. SPE International Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil Symposium, Calgary, Canada, 2123 October, SPE 117324.Google Scholar
Naderi, K. & Babadagli, T. 2010 Influence of intensity and frequency of ultrasonic waves on capillary interaction and oil recovery from different rock types. Ultrason. Sonochem. 17 (3), 500508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nikolaevskii, V. N. 1989 Mechanism of vibroaction for oil recovery from reservoirs and dominant frequencies. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 307 (3), 570575.Google Scholar
Nikolaevskii, V. N. 1992 Rock vibration and finite oil recovery. Fluid Dyn. 27 (5), 689696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozina, E. Y. 2003 Effect of pulsed ultrasonic field on the filling of a capillary with a liquid. Colloid J. 64 (3), 359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozina, E. Y. & Rosin, Y. P. 2003 About the nature of the sound capillary pressure. In 13th Session of the Russian Acoustical Society, Moscow, 2529 August 2003.Google Scholar
Schoeppel, R. J. & Howard, A. W. 1966 Effect of ultrasonic irradiation on coalescence and separation of crude oil–water emulsions. In 41st Annual Fall Meeting of the SPE/AIME, Dallas, TX. SPE 1507.Google Scholar
Simkin, E. M. 1993 A possible mechanism of vibroseismic action on an oil-bearing bed. J. Engng Phys. Thermophys. 64 (4), 355359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simkin, E. M. & Surguchev, M. L. 1991 Advanced vibroseismic technique for water flooded reservoir stimulation, mechanism and field tests results. In The Sixth European IOR Symposium, Stavanger, Norway.Google Scholar
Tai, K. 2005 NanoFab Glass Microfluidic Device Fabrication Manual. NanoFab, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB.Google Scholar
Tamura, S., Tsunekawa, Y., Okumiya, M. & Furukawa, Y. 2005 Liquid adhesion to an ultrasonically vibrating end surface. J. Appl. Phys. 98 (6), 063524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar