Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T12:37:20.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quasi-three dimensional analysis of global instabilities: onset of vortex shedding behind a wavy cylinder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2011

A. GARBARUK
Affiliation:
Saint-Petersburg State Polytechnic University, St Petersburg, 195220, Russia
J. D. CROUCH*
Affiliation:
The Boeing Company, Seattle, WA 98124-2207, USA
*
Email address for correspondence: jeffrey.d.crouch@boeing.com

Abstract

In this paper the global-stability theory is extended to account for weak spanwise-flow variations using a quasi-three-dimensional framework. The analysis considers the onset of vortex shedding behind a circular cylinder with a spanwise-varying diameter. The quasi-three-dimensional approach models the fully three-dimensional flow structure as a series of two-dimensional eigenvalue problems representing the sectional-flow behaviour. The sectional results are coupled together using the Ginzburg–Landau equation, which models the diffusive coupling and provides the global response. The onset of global instability (and thus vortex shedding) is linked to both the sectional growth rates (characterized by the maximum-diameter location) and the spanwise extent of the zone of instability. Unsteady numerical simulations are used to guide the global-stability analysis and to assess the fidelity of the predictions. Results from the stability analysis are shown to be in good agreement with the numerical simulations, which are in close agreement with experiments.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Albarède, P. & Monkewitz, P. A. 1992 A model for the formation of oblique shedding and chevron patterns in cylinder wakes. Phys. Fluids A 4, 744756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albarède, P. & Provansal, M. 1995 Quasi-periodic cylinder wakes and the Ginzburg–Landau model. J. Fluid Mech. 291, 191222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chetan, S. J. 2010 Dynamics of vortex shedding from slender cones. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of London.Google Scholar
Crouch, J. D. 1998 Theory of instability and transition. In The Handbook of Fluid Dynamics (ed. Johnson, R. W.), pp. 13-12–13-25, CRC Press.Google Scholar
Crouch, J. D., Garbaruk, A. & Magidov, D. 2007 Predicting the onset of flow unsteadiness based on global instability. J. Comput. Phys. 224, 924940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crouch, J. D., Garbaruk, A., Magidov, D. & Travin, A. 2009 Origin of transonic buffet on aerofoils. J. Fluid Mech. 628, 357369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaster, M. 1969 Vortex shedding from slender cones at low Reynolds numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 38, 565576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammache, M. & Gharib, M. 1991 An experimental study of the parallel and oblique vortex shedding from circular cylinders. J. Fluid Mech. 232, 567590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, C. P. 1987 A finite-element study of the onset of vortex shedding in flow past variously shaped bodies. J. Fluid Mech. 182, 2345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noack, B. R., Ohle, F. & Eckelmann, H. 1991 On cell formation in vortex streets. J. Fluid Mech. 227, 293308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papangelou, A. 1992 Vortex shedding from slender cones at low Reynolds numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 242, 299321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, P. L. 1981 Approximate Riemann solvers, parameters vectors and difference schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 43, 357372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strelets, M. 2001 Detached-eddy simulation of massively separated flows. AIAA Paper 2001-0879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, C. H. K. 1989 Oblique and parallel modes of vortex shedding in the wake of a circular cylinder at low Reynolds numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 206, 579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zebib, A. 1987 Stability of viscous flow past a circular cylinder. J. Engng Math. 21, 155165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar