Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:22:07.337Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The rate of magnetic field penetration through a Bénard convection layer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2006

E. M. Drobyshevski
Affiliation:
A. F. Ioffe Physical-Technical Institute, U.S.S.R. Academy of Sciences, Leningrad K-21
E. N. Kolesnikova
Affiliation:
A. F. Ioffe Physical-Technical Institute, U.S.S.R. Academy of Sciences, Leningrad K-21
V. S. Yuferev
Affiliation:
A. F. Ioffe Physical-Technical Institute, U.S.S.R. Academy of Sciences, Leningrad K-21

Abstract

Non-stationary MHD interaction of a horizontal magnetic field with a three-dimensional cellular convection is studied by means of computational methods and methods of mean field electrodynamics.

For a given magnetic field drop across the convective layer, the rate of magnetic flux penetration through this layer is characterized by two integral coefficients: the first one describing the topological pumping effect arises from the antisymmetric part of the α-effect, while the second coefficient accounts for the enhancement of the effective diffusion due to the convective motions. In the magnetic-Reynolds-number range studied (−5 [les ] Rm [les ] 5) these coefficients are found to be, correspondingly, odd and even functions of Rm only. The net magnetic flux escape rate into vacuum decreases at Rm > 2·2 when compared with a case of a layer without cellular motions. Here the topological pumping prevails not only over the convective enhancement of diffusion but begins to suppress even the background diffusion action.

Thus, the asymmetry in the transport properties of cellular motion is again demonstrated, and their difference from those of random turbulence is identified.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1980 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Crank, J. & Nicolson, P. 1947 A practical method for numerical evaluation of solutions of partial differential equations of the heat-conduction type. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 43, 5067.Google Scholar
Drobyshevski, E. M. 1971 On the structure of motions in convective envelope of the Sun. Soln. Dannye (Solar Data) 6, 8488.Google Scholar
Drobyshevski, E. M. 1977 Magnetic field transfer by two-dimensional convection and solar ‘semi-dynamo’. Astrophys. & Space Sci. 46, 4149.Google Scholar
Drobyshevski, E. M. & Yuferev, V. S. 1974 Topological pumping of magnetic flux by three-dimensional convection. J. Fluid Mech. 65, 3344.Google Scholar
Krause, F. 1978 The pumping effect in mean-field magnetohydrodynamics, Publ. Astron. Inst. Czechoslov. 54, 4142.Google Scholar
Moffatt, H. K. 1976 Generation of magnetic fields by fluid motion. Adv. Appl. Mech. 16, 119181.Google Scholar
Moffatt, H. K. 1978 Magnetic Field Generation in Electrically Conducting Fluids. Cambridge University Press.
Parker, E. N. 1975 The escape of magnetic flux from a turbulent body of gas. Astrophys. J. 202, 523527.Google Scholar
Rädler, H.-K. 1976 Mean-field magnetohydrodynamics as a basis of solar dynamo theory. In Basic Mechanisms of Solar Activity (ed. V. Bumba & J. Kleczek), pp. 323344. Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel.
Ruzmaikin, A. A. & Vainshtein, S. I. 1978 Magnetic field transport in the solar convective zone. Astrophys. & Space Sci. 57, 195202.Google Scholar
Vainshtein, S. I. 1978 MHD effects in turbulized medium with nonhomogeneous density. Magnitnaya Gidrodinamika 1, 4550.Google Scholar
Weiss, N. O. 1966 The expulsion of magnetic flux by eddies. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 293, 310328.Google Scholar