Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:35:57.160Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The sedimentation of one sphere past a second attached to a wall

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2006

K. Malysa ,
T. Dabroś  and
T. G. M. Van De Ven
K. Malysa
Affiliation:
Pulp and Paper Research Institute of Canada and Department of Chemistry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3A 2A7
T. Dabroś
Affiliation:
Pulp and Paper Research Institute of Canada and Department of Chemistry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3A 2A7 Present address: Department of Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.
T. G. M. Van De Ven
Affiliation:
Pulp and Paper Research Institute of Canada and Department of Chemistry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3A 2A7
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experimental results are reported on hydrodynamic interactions between a solid plate with a spherical particle attached to it and a rigid sphere moving parallel to the plate. Trajectories and velocities of the moving sphere were determined by taking single-frame multiple-image photographs using stroboscopic light.

Sphere—sphere hydrodynamic interactions were detectable on the background of plate—sphere interactions for initial dimensionless sphere—wall separations Z0 < 4.9. The sphere trajectories were found to be symmetrical for, Z0 ≥ 2.3 and asymmetrical otherwise. For asymmetrical trajectories the sphere velocity was larger after the encounter than prior to it. It was concluded that surface roughness of the spheres was responsible for the observed deviations from symmetry.

Numerical calculations were performed to obtain sphere trajectories and velocities. The calculations agree with the experimental data for dimensionless distances between sphere centres r > 2.5. For r < 2.5 the numerical results were in fair agreement with the data when Z0 [gsim ] 2.9. For smaller Z0, theoretical predictions were inaccurate.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 162 , January 1986 , pp. 157 - 170
Copyright
© 1986 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamczyk, Z. & van de ven, T. G. M. 1983 Pathlines around freely rotating spheroids in simple shear flow. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 9, 203.Google Scholar
Adamczyk, Z., Adamczyk, M. & van de VEN, T. G. M. 1983 Resistance coefficient of a solid sphere approaching plane and curved boundaries. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 96, 204.Google Scholar
Adler, P. M. 1981a Heterocoagulation in shear flow. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 83, 106.Google Scholar
Adler, P. M. 1981b Interaction of unequal spheres. I. Hydrodynamic interaction: colloidal forces. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 84, 461.Google Scholar
Ambari, A., Manuel, B. G. & Guyon, E. 1983 Effect of a plane wall on a sphere moving parallel to it. J. Physique Lettres 44, L–143.Google Scholar
Arp, P. A. & Mason, S. G. 1977a The kinetics of flowing dispersions. VIII. Doublets of rigid spheres (theoretical). J. Colloid Interface Sci. 61, 21.Google Scholar
Arp, P. A. & Mason, S. G. 1977b The kinetics of flowing dispersions. XI. Doublets of rigid spheres (experimental). J. Colloid Interface Sci. 61, 44.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. & Green, J. T. 1972 The hydrodynamic interaction of two small freely-moving spheres in a linear flow field. J. Fluid Mech. 56, 375.Google Scholar
Blake, J. R. 1971 A note on the image system for a Stokeslet in a no-slip boundary. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 70, 303.Google Scholar
Blake, J. R. & Chwang, A. T. 1974 Fundamental singularities of viscous flow. Part 1: The image system in the vicinity of a stationary no-slip boundary. J. Eng. Math. 8, 23.Google Scholar
Cox, R. G. & Mason, S. G. 1971 Suspended particles in fluid flow through tubes. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 3, 191.Google Scholar
Dbro, T. & van de ven, T. G. M. 1982 Kinetics of coating by colloidal particles. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 89, 232.Google Scholar
Dbro, T. & van de ven, T. G. M. 1983 On the effects of blocking and particle detachment on coating kinetics. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 93, 576.Google Scholar
Dbro, T. 1985 A singularity method for calculating hydrodynamic forces and particle velocities in low Reynolds number flows. J. Fluid Mech. 156, 1.Google Scholar
Darabaner, C. L. & Mason, S. G. 1967 Particle motion in sheared suspensions. XXII. Interactions of rigid spheres (experimental). Rheol. Ada 6, 273.Google Scholar
Davis, M. H. 1969 The slow translation and rotation of two unequal spheres in a viscous flow. Chem. Engng Sci. 24, 1769.Google Scholar
Faxen, H. 1923 Die Bewegung einer starren Kugel längs der Achse eines mit zäher Flüssigkeit gefüllten Rohres. Ark. Mat. Astron. Fys. 17, 1.Google Scholar
Goldman, A. J., Cox, R. G. & Brenner, H. 1967 Slow viscous motion of a sphere parallel to a plane wall. I. Motion through a quiescent liquid. Chem. Engng Sci. 22, 637.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, D. J. & Onishi, Y. 1984 Calculation of the resistance and mobility functions for two unequal rigid spheres in low-Reynolds-number flow. J. Fluid Mech. 139, 261.Google Scholar
Maude, A. D. 1961 End effects in a falling-sphere viscometer. Brit. J. Appl. Phys. 12, 293.Google Scholar
Miyamura, A., Jwasaki, S. & Ishii, T. 1981 Experimental wall correction factors of single solid spheres in triangular and square cylinders, and parallel plates. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 7, 41.Google Scholar
O'Neill, M. E.1968 A sphere in contact with a plane wall in a slow linear shear flow. Chem. Engng Sci. 23, 1923.Google Scholar
O'Neill, M. E. & Stewartson, K.1967 On the slow motion of a sphere parallel to a nearby parallel wall. J. Fluid Mech. 27, 705.Google Scholar
O'Neill, M. E. & Majumdar, S. R.1970 Asymmetrical slow viscous fluid motions caused by the translation or rotation of two spheres. Part I. The determination of exact solutions for any values of the ratio of radii and separation parameters. Z. angew. Math. 21, 164.Google Scholar
Stimson, M. & Jeffery, G. B. 1926 The motion of two spheres in a viscous fluid. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 111, 110.Google Scholar
Takamura, K., Goldsmith, H. L. & Mason, S. G. 1981 The microrheology of colloidal dispersions. XII. Trajectories of orthokinetic pair-collisions of latex spheres in a simple electrolyte. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 82, 175.Google Scholar
van de Ven, T. G. M. & Mason, S. G. 1976 The microrheology of colloidal dispersions. IV. Pairs of interacting spheres in shear flow. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 57, 505.Google Scholar
van de Ven, T. G. M. & Mason, S. G. 1977 The microrheology of colloidal dispersions. VII. Orthokinetic doublet formation of spheres. Coll. Polymer Sci. 255, 794.Google Scholar
van de Ven, T. G. M. 1982 Interactions between colloidal particles in simple shear flow. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 17, 105.Google Scholar
Vrij, A. 1966 Possible mechanism for the spontaneous rupture of thin, free liquid films. Trans. Faraday Soc. 42, 23.Google Scholar