Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:59:10.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The shear dynamo problem for small magnetic Reynolds numbers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2010

S. SRIDHAR  and
NISHANT K. SINGH
S. SRIDHAR*
Affiliation:
Raman Research Institute, Sadashivanagar, Bangalore 560 080, India
NISHANT K. SINGH
Affiliation:
Raman Research Institute, Sadashivanagar, Bangalore 560 080, India Joint Astronomy Programme, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560 012, India
*
†Email address for correspondence: ssridhar@rri.res.in
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We study large-scale kinematic dynamo action due to turbulence in the presence of a linear shear flow in the low-conductivity limit. Our treatment is non-perturbative in the shear strength and makes systematic use of both the shearing coordinate transformation and the Galilean invariance of the linear shear flow. The velocity fluctuations are assumed to have low magnetic Reynolds number (Rem), but could have arbitrary fluid Reynolds number. The equation for the magnetic fluctuations is expanded perturbatively in the small quantity, Rem. Our principal results are as follows: (i) the magnetic fluctuations are determined to the lowest order in Rem by explicit calculation of the resistive Green's function for the linear shear flow; (ii) the mean electromotive force is then calculated and an integro-differential equation is derived for the time evolution of the mean magnetic field. In this equation, velocity fluctuations contribute to two different kinds of terms, the ‘C’ and ‘D’ terms, respectively, in which first and second spatial derivatives of the mean magnetic field, respectively, appear inside the space–time integrals; (iii) the contribution of the D term is such that its contribution to the time evolution of the cross-shear components of the mean field does not depend on any other components except itself. Therefore, to the lowest order in Rem, but to all orders in the shear strength, the D term cannot give rise to a shear-current-assisted dynamo effect; (iv) casting the integro-differential equation in Fourier space, we show that the normal modes of the theory are a set of shearing waves, labelled by their sheared wavevectors; (v) the integral kernels are expressed in terms of the velocity-spectrum tensor, which is the fundamental dynamical quantity that needs to be specified to complete the integro-differential equation description of the time evolution of the mean magnetic field; (vi) the C term couples different components of the mean magnetic field, so they can, in principle, give rise to a shear-current-type effect. We discuss the application to a slowly varying magnetic field, where it can be shown that forced non-helical velocity dynamics at low fluid Reynolds number does not result in a shear-current-assisted dynamo effect.

JFM classification

MHD and Electrohydrodynamics: Dynamo theory MHD and Electrohydrodynamics: MHD and Electrohydrodynamics
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 664 , 10 December 2010 , pp. 265 - 285
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blackman, E. G. 1998 In situ origin of large-scale galactic magnetic fields without kinetic kelicity? Astrophys. J. 496, L17–L20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandenburg, A., Rädler, K.-H., Rheinhardt, M. & Käpylä, P. J. 2008 Magnetic diffusivity tensor and dynamo effects in rotating and shearing turbulence. Astrophys. J. 676, 740–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandenburg, A. & Subramanian, K. 2005 Astrophysical magnetic fields and nonlinear dynamo theory. Phys. Rep. 417, 1–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, D. W. & Proctor, M. R. E. 2009 Large-scale dynamo action driven by velocity shear and rotating convection. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 044501(1)–044501(4).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Käpylä, P. J., Korpi, M. J. & Brandenburg, A. 2008 Large-scale dynamos in turbulent convection with shear. Astron. Astrophys. 491, 353–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, F. & Rädler, K.-H. 1971 Elektrodynamik der mittleren Felder in turbulenten leitenden Medien und Dynamotheorie. In Ergebnisse der Plasmaphysik und der Gaselektronik, Band 2, pp. 2–154. Akademie.Google Scholar
Krause, F. & Rädler, K.-H. 1980 Mean-Field Magnetohydrodynamics and Dynamo Theory. Pergamon.Google Scholar
Moffatt, H. K. 1978 Magnetic Field Generation in Electrically Conducting Fluids. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parker, E. N. 1979 Cosmical Magnetic Fields: Their Origin and Their Activity. Clarendon, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Proctor, M. R. E. 2007 Effects of fluctuation on dynamo models. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 382, L39–L42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rädler, K.-H. & Stepanov, R. 2006 Mean electromotive force due to turbulence of a conducting fluid in the presence of mean flow. Phys. Rev E 73, 056311(1)–056311(15).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rincon, F., Ogilvie, G. I., Proctor, M. R. E. & Cossu, C. 2008 Subcritical dynamos in shear flows. Astron. Nachr. 329, 750–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogachevskii, I. & Kleeorin, N. 2003 Electromotive force and large-scale magnetic dynamo in a turbulent flow with a mean shear. Phys. Rev. E 68, 036301(1)–036301(12).Google Scholar
Rogachevskii, I. & Kleeorin, N. 2004 Nonlinear theory of a shear-current effect and mean-field magnetic dynamos. Phys. Rev. E 70, 046310(1)–046310(15).Google ScholarPubMed
Rogachevskii, I. & Kleeorin, N. 2008 Nonhelical mean-field dynamos in a sheared turbulence. Astron. Nachr. 329, 732–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rüdiger, G. & Kitchatinov, L. L. 2006 Do mean-field dynamos in nonrotating turbulent shear-flows exist? Astron. Nachr. 327, 298–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schekochihin, A. A., Heinemann, T., Kleeorin, N., Lesur, G., Mallet, A., McWilliams, J. C., Rogachevskii, I. & Yousef, T. A. 2008 Magnetic-field generation by randomly forced shearing waves. arXiv:0810.2225.Google Scholar
Singh, N. K. & Sridhar, S. 2010 Transport coefficients for the shear dynamo problem at small Reynolds numbers arXiv:1003.2787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokolov, D. D. 1997 The disk dynamo with fluctuating spirality. Astron. Rep. 41, 68–72.Google Scholar
Sridhar, S. & Subramanian, K. 2009 a Shear dynamo problem: quasilinear kinematic theory. Phys. Rev E 79, 045305(R1)–045305(R4).Google ScholarPubMed
Sridhar, S. & Subramanian, K. 2009 b Nonperturbative quasilinear approach to the shear dynamo problem. Phys. Rev E 80, 066315(1)–066315(13).Google Scholar
Vishniac, E. T. & Brandenburg, A. 1997 An incoherent alpha - omega dynamo in accretion disks. Astrophys. J. 475, 263–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yousef, T. A., Heinemann, T., Schekochihin, A. A., Kleeorin, N., Rogachevskii, I., Iskakov, A. B., Cowley, S. C. & McWilliams, J. C. 2008 a Generation of magnetic field by combined action of turbulence and shear. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 184501(1)–184501(4).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yousef, T. A., Heinemann, T., Rincon, F., Schekochihin, A. A., Kleeorin, N., Rogachevskii, I., Cowley, S. C. & McWilliams, J. C. 2008 b Numerical experiments on dynamo action in sheared and rotating turbulence. Astron. Nachr. 329, 737–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar