Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T19:39:27.335Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Turbulence in transient channel flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2013

S. He  and
M. Seddighi
S. He*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 3JD, UK
M. Seddighi
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 3JD, UK
*
†Email address for correspondence: s.he@sheffield.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Direct numerical simulations (DNS) are performed of a transient channel flow following a rapid increase of flow rate from an initially turbulent flow. It is shown that a low-Reynolds-number turbulent flow can undergo a process of transition that resembles the laminar–turbulent transition. In response to the rapid increase of flow rate, the flow does not progressively evolve from the initial turbulent structure to a new one, but undergoes a process involving three distinct phases (pre-transition, transition and fully turbulent) that are equivalent to the three regions of the boundary layer bypass transition, namely, the buffeted laminar flow, the intermittent flow and the fully turbulent flow regions. This transient channel flow represents an alternative bypass transition scenario to the free-stream-turbulence (FST) induced transition, whereby the initial flow serving as the disturbance is a low-Reynolds-number turbulent wall shear flow with pre-existing streaky structures. The flow nevertheless undergoes a ‘receptivity’ process during which the initial structures are modulated by a time-developing boundary layer, forming streaks of apparently specific favourable spacing (of about double the new boundary layer thickness) which are elongated streamwise during the pre-transitional period. The structures are stable and the flow is laminar-like initially; but later in the transitional phase, localized turbulent spots are generated which grow spatially, merge with each other and eventually occupy the entire wall surfaces when the flow becomes fully turbulent. It appears that the presence of the initial turbulent structures does not promote early transition when compared with boundary layer transition of similar FST intensity. New turbulent structures first appear at high wavenumbers extending into a lower-wavenumber spectrum later as turbulent spots grow and join together. In line with the transient energy growth theory, the maximum turbulent kinetic energy in the pre-transitional phase grows linearly but only in terms of ${u}^{\ensuremath{\prime} } $, whilst ${v}^{\ensuremath{\prime} } $ and ${w}^{\ensuremath{\prime} } $ remain essentially unchanged. The energy production and dissipation rates are very low at this stage despite the high level of ${u}^{\ensuremath{\prime} } $. The pressure–strain term remains unchanged at that time, but increases rapidly later during transition along with the generation of turbulent spots, hence providing an unambiguous measure for the onset of transition.

JFM classification

Boundary Layers: Pipe flow boundary layer Turbulent Flows: Turbulent Flows Turbulent Flows: Turbulent transition
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 715 , 25 January 2013 , pp. 60 - 102
Copyright
©2013 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abe, H., Kawamura, H. & Matsuo, Y. 2001 Direct numerical simulation of a fully developed turbulent channel flow with respect to the Reynolds number dependence. Trans. ASME: J. Fluids Engng 123 (2), 382–393 (also refer to the benchmark data website: http://murasun.me.noda.tus.ac.jp/turbulence/).Google Scholar
Andersson, P., Berggren, M. & Henningson, D. S. 1999 Optimal disturbances and bypass transition in boundary layers. Phys. Fluids 11 (1), 134–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asai, M., Minagawa, M. & Nishioka, M. 2002 The instability and breakdown of a near-wall low-speed streak. J. Fluid Mech. 455, 289–314.Google Scholar
Avila, K., Moxey, D., De Lozar, A., Avila, M., Barkley, D. & Hof, B. 2011 The onset of turbulence in pipe flow. Science 333 (6039), 192–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brandt, L., Schlatter, P. & Henningson, D. S. 2004 Transition in boundary layers subject to free-stream turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 517, 167–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, D. R., Windall, S. E. & Peeters, M. F. 1982 Flow visualization study of transition in plane Poiseuille flow. J. Fluid Mech. V 121, 487–505.Google Scholar
Chung, Y. M. 2005 Unsteady turbulent flow with sudden pressure gradient changes. Intl J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 47 (8–9), 925–930.Google Scholar
Colombo, A. F., Lee, P. & Karney, B. W. 2009 A selective literature review of transient-based leak detection methods. J. Hydro-environment Res. 2 (4), 212–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durbin, P. & Wu, X. 2007 Transition beneath vortical disturbances. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 39, 107–128.Google Scholar
Eckhardt, B., Schneider, T. M., Hof, B. & Westerweel, J. 2007 Turbulence transition in pipe flow. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 39, 447–468.Google Scholar
Elsnab, J., Klewicki, J., Maynes, D. & Ameel, T. 2011 Mean dynamics of transitional channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 678, 451–481.Google Scholar
Fornarelli, F. & Vittori, G. 2009 Oscillatory boundary layer close to a rough wall. Eur. J. Mech. (B/Fluids) 28 (2), 283–295.Google Scholar
Fransson, J. H. M., Matsubara, M. & Alfredsson, P. H. 2005 Transition induced by free stream turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 527, 1–25.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, D. & Moss, E. A. 2004 Rapid temporal acceleration of a turbulent pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 514, 65–75.Google Scholar
He, S., Ariyaratne, C. & Vardy, A. E. 2011 Wall shear stress in accelerating turbulent pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 685, 440–460.Google Scholar
He, S. & Jackson, J. D. 2000 A study of turbulence under conditions of transient flow in a pipe. J. Fluid Mech. 408, 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, S. & Jackson, J. D. 2009 An experimental study of pulsating turbulent flow in a pipe. Eur. J. Mech. (B/Fluids) 28 (2), 309–320.Google Scholar
Hernon, D. O. M. H., Walsh, E. J. & McEligot, D. M. 2007 Experimental investigation into the routes to bypass transition and the shear-sheltering phenomenon. J. Fluid Mech. 591, 461–479.Google Scholar
Jacobs, R. G. & Durbin, P. A. 2001 Simulations of bypass transition. J. Fluid Mech. 428, 185–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeong, J. & Hussain, F. 1995 On the identification of a vortex. J. Fluid Mech. 285, 69–94.Google Scholar
Kim, J. & Moin, P. 1985 Application of a fractional-step method to incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. J. Comput. Phys. 59 (2), 308–323.Google Scholar
Kim, J., Moin, P. & Moser, R. 1987 Turbulence statistics in fully developed channel flow at low Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 177, 133–166.Google Scholar
Klebanoff, P. S. 1971 Effect of free stream turbulence on the laminar boundary layer. Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 10 (11), 1323.Google Scholar
Lagha, M. 2007 Turbulent spots and waves in a model for plane Poiseuille flow. Phys. Fluids 19 (124103).Google Scholar
Luchini, P. 2000 Reynolds-number-independent instability of the boundary layer over a flat surface: optimal perturbations. J. Fluid Mech. 404, 289–309.Google Scholar
Mandal, A. C., Venkatakrishnan, L. & Dey, J. 2010 A study on boundary-layer transition induced by free stream turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 660, 114–146.Google Scholar
Maruyama, T., Kuribayashi, T. & Mizushina, T. 1976 The structure of the turbulence in transient pipe flows. J. Chem. Engng Japan 9 (6), 431–439.Google Scholar
Matsubara, M. & Alfredsson, P. H. 2001 Disturbance growth in boundary layers subjected to free stream turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 430, 149–168.Google Scholar
Mellibovsky, F., Meseguer, A., Schneider, T. M. & Eckhardt, B. 2009 Transition in localized pipe flow turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (054502).Google Scholar
Meseguer, Ã. & Trefethen, L. N. 2003 Linearized pipe flow to Reynolds number 107. J. Comput. Phys. 186 (1), 178–197.Google Scholar
Moin, P. & Mahesh, K. 1998 Direct numerical simulation: a tool in turbulence research. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 30, 539–578.Google Scholar
Moser, R. D., Kim, J. & Mansour, N. N. 1999 Direct numerical simulation of turbulent channel flow up to ${\mathit{Re}}_{\tau } = 590$. Phys. Fluids 11 (4), 943–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullin, T. 2011 Experimental studies of transition to turbulence in a pipe. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagarajan, S., Lele, S. K. & Ferziger, J. H. 2007 Leading-edge effects in bypass transition. J. Fluid Mech. 572, 471–504.Google Scholar
Nolan, K. P., Walsh, E. J. & McEligot, D. M. 2010 Quadrant analysis of a transitional boundary layer subject to free-stream turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 658, 310–335.Google Scholar
Orlandi, P. 2001 Fluid Flow Phenomena: A Numerical Toolkit. Kluwer.Google Scholar
Orszag, S. A. 1971 Accurate solution of the Orr–Sommerfeld stability equation. J. Fluid Mech. 50 (4), 689–703.Google Scholar
Ovchinnikov, V., Choudhari, M. M. & Piomelli, U. 2008 Numerical simulations of boundary-layer bypass transition due to high-amplitude free-stream turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 613, 135–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfenninger, W. 1961 Boundary Layer Suction Experiments with Laminar Flow at High Reynolds Numbers in the Inlet Length of a Tube by Various Suction Methods, in Boundary Layer and Flow Control (ed. Lachmann, G. V.), pp. 961–980. Pergamon.Google Scholar
Rai, M. M. & Moin, P. 1993 Direct numerical simulation of transition and turbulence in a spatially evolving boundary layer. J. Comput. Phys. 109 (2), 169–192.Google Scholar
Reynolds, O. 1883 An experimental investigation of the circumstances which determine whether the motion of water shall be direct or sinuous and the law of resistance in parallel channels. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 174, 935–982.Google Scholar
Ricco, P., Luo, J. & Wu, X. 2011 Evolution and instability of unsteady nonlinear streaks generated by free-stream vortical disturbances. J. Fluid Mech. 677, 1–38.Google Scholar
Roach, P. E. & Brierley, D. H. 1992 The influence of a turbulent free stream on zero pressure gradient transitional boundary layer development part I: test cases T3A and T3B. In Numerical Simulation of Unsteady Flows and Transition to Turbulence (ed. Pironneau, O., Rodi, W., Rhyming, A. M., Savill, L. & Truong, T. V.), pp. 319–347. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schlatter, P., Brandt, L., de Lange, H. C. & Henningson, D. S. 2008 On streak breakdown in bypass transition. Phys. Fluids 20 (101505).Google Scholar
Schumacher, J. & Eckhardt, B. 2001 Evolution of turbulent spots in a parallel shear flow. Phys. Rev. E 63 (4 II), 463071–463079.Google Scholar
Scotti, A. & Piomelli, U. 2001 Numerical simulation of pulsating turbulent channel flow. Phys. Fluids 13 (5), 1367–1384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seddighi, M. 2011 Study of turbulence and wall shear stress in unsteady flow over smooth and rough wall surfaces. PhD thesis, University of Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Seddighi, M., He, S., Orlandi, P. & Vardy, A. E. 2011 A comparative study of turbulence in ramp-up and ramp-down unsteady flows. Flow Turbul. Combust. 86 (3–4), 439–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shan, H., Ma, B., Zhang, Z. & Nieuwstadt, F. T. M. 1999 Direct numerical simulation of a puff and a slug in transitional cylindrical pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 387, 39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tardu, S. F. & Da Costa, P. 2005 Experiments and modeling of an unsteady turbulent channel flow. AIAA J. 43 (1), 140–148.Google Scholar
Van, D. A., O’Donoghue, T., Davies, A. G. & Ribberink, J. S. 2011 Experimental study of the turbulent boundary layer in acceleration-skewed oscillatory flow. J. Fluid Mech. 684, 251–283.Google Scholar
Vaughan, N. J. & Zaki, T. A. 2011 Stability of zero-pressure-gradient boundary layer distorted by unsteady Klebanoff streaks. J. Fluid Mech. 681, 116–153.Google Scholar
Voke, P. R. & Yang, Z. 1995 Numerical study of bypass transition. Phys. Fluids 7 (9), 2256–2264.Google Scholar
Willis, A. P., Peixinho, J., Kerswell, R. R. & Mullin, T. 1876 Experimental and theoretical progress in pipe flow transition. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 366, 2671–2684.Google Scholar
Wu, X., Jacobs, R. G., Hunt, J. C. R. & Durbin, P. A. 1999 Simulation of boundary layer transition induced by periodically passing wakes. J. Fluid Mech. 398, 109–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, X. & Moin, P. 2009 Direct numerical simulation of turbulence in a nominally zero-pressure-gradient flat-plate boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 630, 5–41.Google Scholar
Wygnanski, I. J. & Champagne, F. H. 1973 On transition in a pipe. Part 1. The origin of puffs and slugs and the flow in a turbulent slug. J. Fluid Mech. 59, 281–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaki, T. A. & Durbin, P. A. 2005 Mode interaction and the bypass route to transition. J. Fluid Mech. 531, 85–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaki, T. A. & Durbin, P. A. 2006 Continuous mode transition and the effects of pressure gradient. J. Fluid Mech. 563, 357–388.Google Scholar
Zaki, T. A. & Saha, S. 2009 On shear sheltering and the structure of vortical modes in single- and two-fluid boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 626, 111–147.Google Scholar
Zang, T. A. & Krist, S. E. 1989 Numerical experiments on stability and transition in plane channel flow. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 1 (1), 41–64.Google Scholar