Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:36:17.159Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Turbulent structure in low-concentration drag-reducing channel flows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2006

T. S. Luchik  and
W. G. Tiederman
T. S. Luchik
Affiliation:
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA
W. G. Tiederman
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A two-component laser-Doppler velocimeter was used to measure simultaneously velocity components parallel and normal to the wall in two fully developed, wellmixed, low-concentration (1-2 p.p.m.) drag-reducing channel flows and one turbulent channel flow of water. The mean velocity profiles, root-mean-square velocity profiles and the distributions of the ūv turbulent correlation confirm that the additives modify the buffer region of the flow. The principal influence of the additives is to damp velocity fluctuations normal to the wall in the buffer region.

The structural results show that the average time between bursts increased for the drag-reducing flows. When compared to a water flow at the same wall shear stress, this increase in the timescale was equal to the increase in the average streak spacing. Conditionally averaged velocity signals of y+ = 30 centred on the leading edge of a burst, as well as those centred on the trailing edge, have the same general characteristics in all three flows indicating that the basic structure of the fundamental momentum transport event is the same in these drag-reducing flows. However, it was clearly shown that the lower-threshold Reynolds-stress-producing motions were damped while the higher-threshold motions were not damped. In the buffer region of the drag-reducing flows this yields a larger mean velocity gradient with damped fluctuations normal to the wall and increased fluctuations in the streamwise direction. It is hypothesized that some strong turbulent motions are required to maintain extended polymer molecules, which produce a solution with properties that can damp lower threshold turbulence and thereby reduce viscous drag.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 190 , May 1988 , pp. 241 - 263
Copyright
© 1988 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achia, B. U. & Thompson, D. W. 1977 Structure of the turbulent boundary layer in drag reducing pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 81, 439.Google Scholar
Alfredsson, P. H. & Johansson, A. V. 1984 On the detection of turbulence generating events. J. Fluid Mech. 139, 325.Google Scholar
Berman, N. S. 1986 Velocity fluctuations in non-homogeneous drag reduction. Chem. Engng Commun. 42, 37.Google Scholar
Bewersdorff, H.-W. 1985 Heterogeneous drag reduction in turbulent pipe flow. In The Influence of Polymer Additives on Velocity and Temperature Fields (ed. B. Gampert), p. 337. Springer.
Bogard, D. G. 1982 Investigation of burst structures in turbulent channel flows through simultaneous flow visualization and velocity measurements. Ph. D. thesis, Purdue University.
Bogard, D. G. & Tiederman, W. G. 1983 Investigation of flow visualization techniques for detecting turbulent bursts. In Symposium on Turbulence, 1981 (ed. X. B. Reed, G. K. Patterson & J. L. Zakin), p. 289. University of Missouri–Rolla.
Bogard, D. G. & Tiederman, W. G. 1986 Burst detection with single-point velocity measurements. J. Fluid Mech. 162, 389.Google Scholar
Bogard, D. G. & Tiederman, W. G. 1987 Characteristics of ejections in turbulent channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 179, 1.Google Scholar
Corino, E. R. & Brodkey, R. S. 1969 A visual study of turbulent shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 37, 1.Google Scholar
Donohue, G. L., Tiederman, W. G. & Reischman, M. M. 1972 Flow visualization of the near-wall region in a drag-reducing flow. J. Fluid Mech. 56, 559.Google Scholar
Frings, B. 1985 Annular injection of concentrated polymer solutions into the wall region of a turbulent pipe flow. In The Influence of Polymer Additives on Velocity and Temperature Fields (ed. B. Gampert), p. 337. Springer. Instruction Manual for System 9100-6, Single Channel High Power LDV. Thermo-Systems Incorporated, St Paul, Minnesota.
Johansson, A. V. & Alfredsson, P. H. 1983 Effects of imperfect spatial resolution on measurements of wall-bounded turbulent shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 137, 409.Google Scholar
Kim, H. T., Kline, S. J. & Reynolds, W. C. 1971 The production of turbulence near a smooth wall in a turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 50, 133.Google Scholar
Kline, S. J., Reynolds, W. C., Schraub, F. A. & Runstadler, P. W. 1967 The structure of turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 30, 741.Google Scholar
Kreplin, H.-P. & Eckelmann, H. 1979 Instantaneous direction of the velocity vector in a fully developed turbulent channel flow. Phys. Fluids 22, 1210.Google Scholar
Logan, S. E. 1972 A laser velocimeter measurement of Reynolds stress in dilute polymer solutions. Ph.D. Thesis, California Institute of Technology.
Luchik, T. S. 1982 A laser velocimeter investigation of turbulent flow in an axisymmetric sudden expansion. Master's thesis, Purdue University.
Luchik, T. S. 1985 The effect of drag-reducing additives on the turbulent structure in channel flows. Ph.D. Thesis, Purdue University.
Luchik, T. S. & Tiederman, W. G. 1984 Bursting rates in channel flows and drag reducing channel flows. In Symposium on Turbulence, 1983 (ed. X. B. Reed, G. K. Patterson & J. L. Zakin), p. 15. University of Missouri - Rolla.
Luchik, T. S. & Tiederman, W. G. 1985 Effect of spanwise probe volume length on laser velocimeter measurements in wall bounded turbulent flows. Exp. Fluid 3, 339.Google Scholar
Luchik, T. S. & Tiederman, W. G. 1987 Timescale and structure of ejections and burst in turbulent channel flows. J. Fluid Mech. 174, 529.Google Scholar
McComb, W. D. & Rabie, L. H. 1982 Local drag reduction due to injection of polymer solutions into turbulent flow in a pipe. Part I: Dependence on local polymer concentration; Part II: Laser-Doppler measurements of turbulent structure. AIChE J. 28, 547.Google Scholar
Offen, G. R. & Kline, S. J. 1975 A comparison and analysis of detection methods for the measurement of production in a boundary layer. In Proc. 3rd Biennial Symposium on Turbulence in Liquids (ed. G. K. Patterson & J. L. Zakin), p. 289. University of Missouri - Rolla.
Oldaker, D. K. & Tiederman, W. G. 1977 Spatial structure of the viscous sublayer in drag-reducing channel flows. Phys. Fluids Suppl. 20, S133.Google Scholar
Reischman, M. M. & Tiederman, W. G. 1975 Laser-Doppler anemometer measurements in drag-reducing channel flows. J. Fluid Mech. 70, 369.Google Scholar
Stevenson, W. H., Thompson, H. D. & Roesler, T. C. 1982 Direct measurements of laser velocimeter bias errors in a turbulent flow. AIAA J. 20, 1720.Google Scholar
Tiederman, W. G., Luchik, T. S. & Bogard, D. G. 1985 Wall layer structure and drag reduction J. Fluid Mech. 156, 419.Google Scholar
Tiederman, W. G., Smith, A. J. & Oldaker, D. K. 1977 Structure of the viscous sublayer in drag-reducing channel flows. In Turbulence in Liquids, 1975 (ed. J. L. Zakin & G. K. Patterson), p. 312. University of Missouri–Rolla.
Walker, D. T., Tiederman, W. G. & Luchik, T. S. 1986 Optimization of the injection process for drag reducing additives. Exp Fluids 4, 114.Google Scholar
Wells, C. S. & Spangler, J. G. 1967 Injection of a drag-reducing fluid into turbulent pipe flow of a Newtonian fluid. Phys. Fluids 10, 1980.Google Scholar
Willmarth, W. W. & Sharma, L. K. 1984 Study of turbulent structure with hot wires smaller than the viscous length. J. Fluid Mech. 142, 121.Google Scholar
Wu, T. Y. & Tulin, M. P. 1972 Drag reduction by ejecting additive solutions into a pure water boundary layer. Trans. ASME D: J. basic Engng 74, 749.Google Scholar