Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:54:48.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A unified description of two-layer flow over topography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2006

Peter G. Baines
Peter G. Baines
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Atmospheric Research, Aspendale, Victoria, Australia 3195
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Observations of the flow of a two-layer fluid resulting from the motion of a towed streamlined two-dimensional obstacle are described in some detail. The experiments were designed to further our understanding of the factors governing the nature and magnitude of upstream disturbances in the general flow of stratified fluid over two-dimensional topography, and predictions for arbitrary two-dimensional flows are made from the results of these experiments. In particular, the relationship between uniformly stratified flow and single-layer flow over topography is suggested. Most of the observed features of interest in these experiments are nonlinear in character. Relatively complete descriptions of the observed flows are presented over a wide range of parameter values, and the phenomena observed include upstream undular and turbulent bores, bores with zero energy loss, ‘rarefactions’ (in which the interface height changes monotonically over a transition region of continuously increasing length), and downstream hydraulic drops and jumps. Their properties are shown to be broadly consistent with predictions from a two-layer hydrostatic model based on continuity and momentum considerations, which employs jump criteria and rarefaction equations where appropriate. Bores occur because of nonlinear steepening when the layer containing the obstacle is thinner than the other, and rarefactions occur when this layer thickness is comparable with or greater than that of the other layer. The speed and amplitude of the upstream bores are governed by nonlinear effects, but their character is determined by a balance between nonlinear steepening, wave dispersion and interfacial friction when the bore is non-turbulent.

Experimental evidence is presented for two types of hysteresis or ‘multiple equilibria’ - situations where two different flow states may exist for the same external steady conditions. In the first of these hysteresis types, the upstream flow may be supercritical or consist of an upstream bore state. It is analogous to the type anticipated for single-layer flow by Baines & Davies (1980) and described numerically by Pratt (1983), but it is only found experimentally for part of the expected parameter range, apparently because of interfacial stress effects. The second hysteresis type is new, and involves the presence or absence of a downstream hydraulic drop and following jump.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 146 , September 1984 , pp. 127 - 167
Copyright
© 1984 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ablowitz, M. J., Fokas, A. S., Satsuma, J. & Segur, H. 1982 On the periodic intermediate long wave equation. J. Phys. A: Math. & Gen. 15, 781–786.Google Scholar
Baines, P. G. 1977 Upstream influence and Long's model in stratified flows. J. Fluid Mech. 82, 147–159.Google Scholar
Baines, P. G. 1979a Observations of stratified flow over two-dimensional obstacles in fluid of finite depth. Tellus 31, 351–371.Google Scholar
Baines, P. G. 1979b Observations of stratified flow past three-dimensional barriers. J. Geophys. Res. 83, 7834–7838.Google Scholar
Baines, P. G. & Davies, P. A. 1980 Laboratory studies of topographic effects in rotating and/or stratified fluids. In Orographic Effects in Planetary Flows, chap. 8. pp. 233–299. GARP Publication no. 23, WMO/ICSU.
Baines, P. G. & Grimshaw, R. H. J. 1979 Stratified flow over finite obstacles with weak stratification. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 13, 317–334.Google Scholar
Benjamin, T. B. 1966 Internal waves of finite amplitude and permanent form. J. Fluid Mech. 25, 241–270.Google Scholar
Benjamin, T. B. 1967 Internal waves of permanent form in fluids of great depth. J. Fluid Mech. 29, 559–592.Google Scholar
Benjamin, T. B. & Lighthill, M. J. 1954 On cnoidal waves and bores. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 224, 448–460.Google Scholar
Byatt-Smith, J. G. B. 1971 The effect of laminar viscosity on the solution of the undular bore. J. Fluid Mech. 48, 33–40.Google Scholar
Chu, V. H. & Baddour, R. E. 1977 Surges, waves and mixing in two-layer density stratified flow. In Proc. 17th Congr. Intl Assoc. Hydraul. Res., vol. 1, pp. 303–310.
Edinger, J. G. 1966 Wave clouds in the marine layer upwind of Pt. Sal. California. J. Appl. Met. 5, 804–809.Google Scholar
Fornberg, B. & Whitham, G. B. 1978 A numerical and theoretical study of certain non-linear wave phenomena. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 289, 373–404.Google Scholar
Houghton, D. D. & Isaacson, E. 1970 Mountain winds. Stud. Numer. Anal. 2, 21–52.Google Scholar
Houghton, D. D. & Kasahara, A. 1968 Nonlinear shallow fluid over an isolated ridge. Commun. Pure Appl. Maths 21, 1–23.Google Scholar
Joseph, R. I. 1977 Solitary waves in a finite depth fluid. J. Phys. A: Math. & Gen. 19, L225–L227.Google Scholar
Keady, G. 1971 Upstream influence on a two-fluid system. J. Fluid Mech. 49, 373–384.Google Scholar
Koop, C. G. & Butler, G. 1981 An investigation of internal solitary waves in a two-fluid system. J. Fluid Mech. 112, 225–251.Google Scholar
Kubota, T., Ko, D. R. S. & Dobbs, L. 1978 Weakly-nonlinear, long internal gravity waves in stratified fluids of finite depth. AIAA J. Hydronautics 12, 157–165.Google Scholar
Long, R. R. 1954 Some aspects of the flow of stratified fluids, II. Experiments with a two-fluid system. Tellus 6, 97–115.Google Scholar
Long, R. R. 1955 Some aspects of the flow of stratified fluids, III. Continuous density gradients. Tellus 7, 341–357.Google Scholar
Long, R. R. 1970 Blocking effects in flow over obstacles. Tellus 22, 471–480.Google Scholar
Long, R. R. 1974 Some experimental observations of upstream disturbances in a two-fluid system. Tellus 26, 313–317.Google Scholar
McIntyre, M. E. 1972 On Long's hypothesis of no upstream influence in uniformly stratified or rotating flow. J. Fluid Mech. 52, 209–243.Google Scholar
Miles, J. W. 1968 Lee waves in a stratified flow. Part 2. Semi-circular obstacle. J. Fluid Mech. 33, 803–814.Google Scholar
Ono, H. 1975 Algebraic solitary waves in stratified fluids. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 39, 1082–1091.Google Scholar
Peregrine, D. H. 1966 Calculations of the development of an undular bore. J. Fluid Mech. 25, 321–330.Google Scholar
Pratt, L. J. 1983 A note on nonlinear flow over obstacles. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 24, 63–68.Google Scholar
Segur, H. & Hammack, J. L. 1982 Soliton models of long internal waves. J. Fluid Mech. 118, 285–304.Google Scholar
Smith, R. B. 1976 The generation of lee waves by the Blue Ridge. J. Atmos. Sci. 33, 507–519.Google Scholar
Stoker, J. J. 1953 Unsteady waves on a running stream. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 6, 471–481.Google Scholar
Sturtevant, B. 1965 Implications of experiments on the weak undular bore. Phys. Fluids 8, 1052–1055.Google Scholar
Su, C. H. 1976 Hydraulic jumps in an incompressible stratified fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 73, 33–47.Google Scholar
Wood, I. R. & Simpson J. E. 1984 Jumps in layered miscible fluids. J. Fluid Mech. 140, 329–342.Google Scholar
Yih, C.-S. & Guha, C. R. 1955 Hydraulic jump in a fluid system of two layers. Tellus 7, 358–366.Google Scholar