Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:44:35.661Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The vaporization of a liquid front moving through a hot porous rock

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Andrew W. Woods  and
Shaun D. Fitzgerald
Andrew W. Woods
Affiliation:
Institute of Theoretical Geophysics, Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics and Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Silver Street, Cambridge CB3 9EW, UK
Shaun D. Fitzgerald
Affiliation:
Institute of Theoretical Geophysics, Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics and Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Silver Street, Cambridge CB3 9EW, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We develop an analytical model to describe the generation of vapour as water moves through a hot porous rock, as occurs in hot, geothermal reservoirs. Typically the isotherms in the liquid lag behind the water-vapour interface and so water is supplied to the interface at the interface temperature. This temperature is lower than that in the rock far ahead of the interface. Therefore, as the hot porous rock is invaded with water, it cools and the heat released is used to vaporize some of the water. At low injection rates, vapour formed from the injected liquid may readily move ahead of the advancing liquid-vapour interface and so the interfacial pressure remains close to that in the far field ahead of the interface. The mass fraction that vaporizes is then limited by the superheat of the rock. For larger injection rates, the interfacial vapour pressure becomes considerably greater than that in the far field in order to drive the vapour ahead of the moving interface. As a result, the interfacial temperature increases. The associated reduction in the thermal energy available for vaporization results in a decrease in the mass fraction of vapour produced.

Since the vapour is compressible, the motion of the vapour ahead of the interface is governed by a nonlinear diffusion equation. Therefore, the geometry of injection has an important effect upon the mass fraction of water that vaporizes. We show that with a constant supply of water from (i) a point source, the mass fraction of water which vaporizes increases towards the maximum permitted by the superheat of the rock; (ii) a line source, a similarity solution exists in which the mass fraction vaporizing is constant; and (iii) a planar source, the liquid-vapour interface steadily translates through the rock with a very small fraction of the injected water vaporizing.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 251 , June 1993 , pp. 563 - 579
Copyright
© 1993 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ames, W. F. 1977 Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations. Academic.
Batchelor, G. K. 1974 Transport properties of two-phase materials with random structure. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 6, 227–255.Google Scholar
Bodvarsson, G. 1972 Thermal problems in the siting of reinjection wells. Geothermics 1 (2), 63–66.Google Scholar
Dagan, G. 1989 Flow and Transport in Porous Formations. Springer.
DiPippo, R. 1980 Geothermal Energy as a Source of Electricity. Washington DC: US Dept. Energy.
Dullien, F. A. L. 1992 Porous Media - Fluid Transport and Pore Structure, pp. 1–574. Academic.
Elder, J. 1981 Geothermal Systems. Academic.
Enedy, K. L. 1989 The role of decline curve at The Geysers. Geoth. Res. Counc. Trans. 13, 383–391.Google Scholar
Grant, M. A., Donaldson, I. G. & Bixley, P. F. 1982 Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. Academic.
Haywood, R. W. 1972 Thermodynamic Tables in SI (Metric) Units. Cambridge University Press.
Kerr, R. A. 1991 Geothermal tragedy of the commons. Science 253, 134–135.Google Scholar
Pruess, K., Calore, C., Celati, R. & Wu, Y. S. 1987 An analytical solution for heat transfer at a boiling front moving through a porous medium. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 30, 2595–2602.Google Scholar
Schubert, G. & Straus, J. M. 1980 Gravitational stability of water over steam in vapour-dominated geothermal systems. J. Geophys. Res. 85, 6505–6512.Google Scholar
Wohletz, K. & Heiken, D. 1992 Voicanology and Geothermal Energy. University of California Press.
Young, J. B. 1988 An equation of state for steam for turbomachinery and other flow calculations. J. Engng Gas Turbines Power 110, 1–7.Google Scholar