Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:45:46.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Exception française’: splendeurs et misères of a formula1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2016

BERT PEETERS
BERT PEETERS*
Affiliation:
Australian National University & Griffith University
*
Address for correspondence: School of Literature, Languages and Linguistics, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia e-mail: Bert.Peeters@anu.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Used at first with their original (definite) article, the phrases exception française and fin de l'exception française gained instant notoriety after the publication of Furet, Julliard and Rosanvallon's 1988 book La République du centre: La fin de l'exception française. Before too long, the shorter phrase, which (contrary to what is sometimes asserted) was already in existence, also started occurring without the article, with other determiners, and in the plural. This paper details some of the splendeurs et misères (including progressive trivialization) of both the longer and the shorter phrase, thought of as exponents of a single formula.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of French Language Studies , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , November 2017 , pp. 291 - 308
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

This paper has greatly benefited from the comments of three anonymous reviewers, who have made it clear how much more research is needed to get to the bottom of the formula ‘exception française’. All imperfections that remain are obviously my own.

References

REFERENCES

Cazes, B. (2004). Tocqueville et l'exception française. La quinzaine littéraire, 874: 22.Google Scholar
Chafer, T. and Godin, E. (eds) (2010). The End of the French Exception? Decline and Revival of the ‘French Model’. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Collard, S. (2004). The elusive French exception. In: Godin, E. and Chafer, T. (eds), The French Exception. Oxford: Berghahn, pp. 30–44. Updated as Collard (2010).Google Scholar
Collard, S. (2010). The French exception: Rise and fall of a Saint-Simonian discourse. In: Chafer, T. and Godin, E. (eds), The End of the French Exception? Decline and Revival of the ‘French Model’. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 17–35.Google Scholar
Crouzet, M. (1984). Stendhal ‘bon européen’: romantisme et nations. In: Del Litto, V. and Ringger, K. (eds), Stendhal et le romantisme: actes du XVe Congrès international stendhalien. Aron: Grand-Chêne, pp. 59–87.Google Scholar
Frishman, R. and Spizman, R. (2015). Author 101: The Insider's Guide to Publishing from Proposal to Bestseller. New York: Morgan James.Google Scholar
Furet, F., Julliard, J. and Rosanvallon, P. (1988). La République du centre: la fin de l'exception française. Paris: Calmann-Lévy.Google Scholar
Gianni, M. (2013). The democratic integration of difference: Reflections on the paradoxes of the French republican model of citizenship”. In: Merle, J.-C. (ed.), Spheres of Global Justice. Volume 1. Global Challenges to Liberal Democracy: Political Participation, Minorities and Migrations. Berlin: Springer, pp. 391–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godin, E. and Chafer, T. (eds) (2004). The French Exception. Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Hewlett, N. (2004). France and exceptionalism. In: Godin, E. and Chafer, T. (eds), The French Exception. Oxford: Berghahn, pp. 3–15.Google Scholar
Jack, A. (1999a). The French Exception: France – still so Special? London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
Jack, A. (1999b). Sur la France: vive la différence. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
Krieg-Planque, A. (2003). “Purification ethnique”: une formule et son histoire. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Krieg-Planque, A. (2006). ‘Formules’ et ‘lieux discursifs’: propositions pour l'analyse du discours politique. Semen, 21: 19–47.Google Scholar
Krieg-Planque, A. (2009). La notion de “formule” en analyse du discours: cadre théorique et méthodologique. Besançon: Presses universitaires de Franche-Comté.Google Scholar
Loughlin, J. (2013). France: From the ‘one and indivisible republic’ to the decentralized unitary state. In: Loughlin, J., Kincaid, J. and Swenden, W. (eds), Routledge Handbook of Regionalism and Federalism. New York: Routledge, pp. 341–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovecy, J. (1999). The end of French exceptionalism? West European Politics, 22: 205–224.Google Scholar
Meyer, P. (2011). Sanguines. Paris: Laffont.Google Scholar
Peeters, B. (forthcoming). L'imparfait du subjonctif chez Jean-Marie Le Pen: perceptions et motifs.Google Scholar
Peyerimhoff, H. de. (1931). [No title.] Bulletin R.G.E. (Supplément hebdomadaire de la Revue générale de l’électricité), 29: 121B.Google Scholar
Rousso, H. (2010). A-t-on encore besoin des historiens? Exception française et rapport contemporain au passé. In : Dambre, M. and Golsan, R. J. (eds), L'exception et la France contemporaine: histoire, imaginaire, littérature. Paris: Presses de la Sorbonne Nouvelle. 17–29.Google Scholar
Sassoon, D. (2013). The Italian anomaly? Comparative European Politics, 11: 280–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seillière, E. (1926). La critique anti-romantique après 1830: Désiré Nisard. Séances et travaux de l'Académie des sciences morales et politiques, 86: 194–240.Google Scholar
Stasse, F. (2002). La véritable histoire de la Grande Bibliothèque. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Tisserrand, E. (1931). Chronique de l’économie française. La France active: revue de toutes les formes de l'activité française, 118: 94–108.Google Scholar