Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-xtvcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-22T22:24:52.822Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kirsten Jeppesen Kragh, Le remplacement de l'imparfait du subjonctif par le présent du subjonctif considéré dans une perspective de grammaticalisation. (Études Romanes, 60.) Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, 2010, 261 pp., 978 87 635 3131 3.

Review products

Kirsten Jeppesen Kragh, Le remplacement de l'imparfait du subjonctif par le présent du subjonctif considéré dans une perspective de grammaticalisation. (Études Romanes, 60.) Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, 2010, 261 pp., 978 87 635 3131 3.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2013

Jonathan R. Kasstan
Jonathan R. Kasstan*
Affiliation:
Department of English Language and LinguisticsSchool of European Culture and LanguagesRutherford CollegeUniversity of Kent Canterbury, CT2 7NXUKJ.Kasstan@kent.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Journal of French Language Studies , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , November 2013 , pp. 456 - 457
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andersen, H. (2001). Markedness and the theory of linguistic change. In: Andersen, H. (ed.), Actualization: Linguistic Change in Progress. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 21–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Detges, U. and Waltereit, R. (2002). Grammaticalization vs. reanalysis: A semantic-pragmatic account of functional change in grammar. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 21.2: 151–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havu, E. (1996). De l'emploi du subjonctif passé. Helsinki: Akademia Scientiarum Fennica.Google Scholar
Lehmann, C. (1995). Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Newcastle: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar