Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T18:49:22.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Historische formelhafte Sprache: Theoretische Grundlagen und methodische Herausforderungen. By Natalia Filatkina. (Formelhafte Sprache 1.) Berlin: de Gruyter, 2018. Pp. x + 423. Hardcover. US$ 126.99.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 February 2020

Stefan Dollinger
Stefan Dollinger*
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia at Vancouver
*
Department of English Language and Literatures, University of British Columbia at Vancouver, 397–1873 East Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1, Canada [stefan.dollinger@ubc.ca]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Germanic Linguistics , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , March 2020 , pp. 96 - 102
Copyright
© Society for Germanic Linguistics 2020 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brinton, Laurel J. 2008. The comment clause in English: Syntactic origins and pragmatic development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burger, Harald. 2015. Phraseologie. 5th edn. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2010. Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dollinger, Stefan. 2016. On the regrettable dichotomy between philology and linguistics: Historical lexicography and historical linguistics as test cases. Studies in the history of English VII, ed. by Chapman, Don, Moore, Colette, & Wilcox, Miranda, 61–89. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Feilke, Helmuth. 1994. Common-Sense-Kompetenz: Überlegungen zu einer Theorie “sympathischen” und “natürlichen” Meinens und Verstehens. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at work. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Havinga, Anna D. 2018. Invisibilising Austrian German: On the effect of linguistic prescriptions and educational reforms on writing practices in 18th-century Austria. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of linguistic change, vol. 1, Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 1. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mattheier, Klaus. 2003. German. Germanic standardizations: Past to present, ed. by Deumert, Ana & Vandenbussche, Wim, 211–244. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, Stephan. 1995. Formelhafte Sprache: Untersuchungen zu ihren pragmatischen und kognitiven Funktionen im gegenwärtigen Deutsch. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 2013. Imprisoned in English: The hazards of English as a default language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wray, Alison. 2002. Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar