Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T09:50:18.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quantity Superlatives in Germanic, or “Life on the Fault Line Between Adjective and Determiner”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2019

Elizabeth Coppock
Elizabeth Coppock*
Affiliation:
Boston University
*
Boston University, Linguistics Program, 621 Commonwealth Ave, Boston MA 02215, USA [eecoppock@gmail.com]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper concerns the superlative forms of the words many, much, few, and little, and their equivalents in German, Dutch, Swedish, Norwegian, Danish, Dalecarlian, Icelandic, and Faroese. It demon-strates that every possible relationship between definiteness marking and interpretation is attested. It also demonstrates that different kinds of agreement mismatches are found under relative and proportional readings. One consistent pattern is that under a relative interpretation, quantity superlatives with adverbial morphology show neuter singular agreement even if the target noun is plural. In contrast, under a proportional interpretation, quantity superlatives always agree in number. This evidence is taken to show that quantity superlatives are not structurally analogous to quality superlatives such as tallest on either a relative or a proportional reading; however, depending on their interpretation, quantity superlatives depart from a plain attributive structure in different ways. On relative readings, they can have a structure akin to that of pseudo-partitives (as in two liters of milk), while on proportional readings, they tend to have a quantificational structure, sometimes involving a true partitive (as in some of the children). Furthermore, I suggest that the agreement features of a quantity superlative depend on the domain from which the target is drawn (the Target-Domain Hypothesis).

Keywords

quantity wordssuperlativesrelative readingproportional readingdefinitenesscrosslinguistic semantics
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Germanic Linguistics , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , June 2019 , pp. 109 - 200
Copyright
© Society for Germanic Linguistics 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Åkerberg, Bengt. 2012. Älvdalsk grammatik. Ulum Dalska. Available at http://www.ulumdalska.se/2012/05/alvdalsk-grammatik/, accessed in June 2015.Google Scholar
Bentzen, Kristine, Rosenkvist, Henrik, & Johannessen, Janne Bondi (eds.). 2015. Studies in Övdalian morphology and syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 2012. Universals in comparative morphology: Suppletion, superlatives, and the structure of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broekhuis, Hans. 2013. Syntax of Dutch: Adjectives and adjective phrases. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Bumford, Dylan. 2017. Split-scope definites: Relative superlatives and haddock descriptions. Linguistics and Philosophy 40. 549–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppock, Elizabeth, & Beaver, David. 2014. A superlative argument for a minimal theory of definiteness. Proceedings of SALT 24, ed. by Snider, Todd, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10988-017-9210-2#citeas 177–196. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Coppock, Elizabeth, & Beaver, David. 2015. Definiteness and determinacy. Linguistics and Philosophy 38. 377–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppock, Elizabeth, & Josefson, Christian. 2015. Completely bare Swedish superlatives. Sinn und Bedeutung 19, ed. by Csipak, Eva & Zeijlstra, Hedde, 179–196. Göttingen: University of Göttingen.Google Scholar
Coppock, Elizabeth, & Kastrup, Olof. 2016. Superlativa kvantitetsord i skandinaviska språk. Poster presented at GRAMINO Grammatik i Norden held at University of Gothenburg, May 10–11, 2016.Google Scholar
Coppock, Elizabeth, Leffel, Tim, Scontras, Gregory, & Kotek, Hadas. 2016. Adverbial superlatives. Paper presented at the Some Institutes for Advanced Study Summer Institute Meeting held at the National Humanities Center, Research Triangle Park, NC, July 18–29, 2016.Google Scholar
Coppock, Elizabeth, Nouri-Hosseini, Golsa, Bogal-Allbritten, Elizabeth, & Stiefeling, Saskia. 2017. Proportional implies relative: A typological universal. Proceedings of the Linguistics Society of America 2. 1–15.Google Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen. 2013. Most: The view from mass. Proceedings of the 19th Amsterdam Colloquium, ed. by Aloni, Maria, Franke, Michael, & Roelofsen, Floris, 99–106. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen, & Giurgea, Ion. 2015. Quantity superlatives vs. proportional quantifiers: A comparative perspective. Paper presented at the Twenty-Fifth Colloquium on Generative Grammar held at IKER, Bayonne, France, May 21–23, 2015.Google Scholar
Farkas, Donka, & Kiss, Katalin É.. 2000. On the comparative and absolute readings of superlatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18. 417–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gawron, Jean Mark. 1995. Comparatives, superlatives, and resolution. Linguistics and Philosophy 18. 333–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez-Rexach, Javier. 2006. Superlative quantifiers and the dynamics of contextdependence. Where semantics meets pragmatics, ed. by Heusinger, Klaus von & Turner, Ken, 237–266. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Hackl, Martin. 2000. Comparative quantifiers. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Hackl, Martin. 2009. On the grammar and processing of proportional quantifiers: Most versus more than half. Natural Language Semantics 17. 63–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallman, Peter. 2016. Superlatives in Syrian Arabic. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 34. 1281–1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hankamer, Jorge, & Mikkelsen, Line. 2002. A morphological analysis of definite nouns in Danish. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 14. 127–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heim, Irene. 1985. Notes on comparatives and related matters. Unpublished manuscript. Semantics Archive. Available at https://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/zc0ZjY0M/Comparatives%2085.pdf, accessed in June 2015.Google Scholar
Heim, Irene. 1999. Notes on superlatives. Unpublished manuscript. MIT. Available at http://www.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/~astechow/Lehre/SS08/Superlative.pdf, accessed in June 2015.Google Scholar
Hoeksema, Jack. 1983. Plurality and conjunction. Studies in model theoretic semantics, ed. by ter Meulen, Alice G. B., 63–84. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1977. X-bar syntax: A study in phrase structure. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kamp, Hans, & Reyle, Uwe. 1993. From discourse to logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Kastrup, Olof. 2016. Superlativa myckenhetspronomen i älvdalska. Gothenburg, Sweden: University of Gothenburg undergraduate thesis.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 2005. Some notes on comparative syntax, with special reference to English and French. Oxford handbook of comparative syntax, ed. by Cinque, Guglielmo & Kayne, Richard S., 3–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kester, Ellen Petra. 1996. The nature of adjectival inflection. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Utrecht Institute of Linguistics dissertation.Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria. 2001. “A piece of the cake” and “a cup of tea”: Partitive and pseudo-partitive nominal constructions in the circum-baltic languages. Circum-baltic languages, vol. 2, ed. by Dahl, Östen & Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria, 523–568. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kotek, Hadas, Sudo, Yasutada, & Hackl, Martin. 2012. Many readings of most. Paper presented at the Forty-Eighth Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, April 19–21, 2012.Google Scholar
Krasikova, Sveta. 2011. On proportional and cardinal ‘many’. Generative Grammar in Geneva 7. 93–114.Google Scholar
Krasikova, Sveta. 2012. Definiteness in superlatives. Logic, language and meaning, ed. by Aloni, Maria, Kimmelman, Vadim, Roelofsen, Floris, Sassoon, Galit W., Schulz, Katrin, & Westera, Matthijs, 411–420. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levander, Lars. 1909. Älvdalsmålet i Dalarna: Ordböjning och syntax. Stockholm: P.A. Norstedt & Söner.Google Scholar
Lockwood, William Burley. 1977. An introduction to Modern Faroese. Tórshavn: Føroya Skúlabúkagrunnur.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Bruce. 1985. Old English syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olhsén, Karin, & Olander, Eva. 2010. Orsaord: En orsamålsordbok. Orsa: Orsa-Skattunge Hembydsförening.Google Scholar
Pancheva, Roumyana. 2015. Quantity superlatives: The view from Slavic and its crosslinguistic implications. Proceedings of the Fourty-Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, ed. by Aparicio, Helena, 1–20. Chicago, IL: CLS.Google Scholar
Pancheva, Roumyana, & Tomaszewicz, Barbara. 2012. Cross-linguistic differences in superlative movement out of nominal phrases. Proceedings of the Thirtieth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL), ed. by Arnett, Nathan & Bennett, Ryan, 292–302. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Rett, Jessica. 2008. Degree modification in natural language. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey dissertation.Google Scholar
Rett, Jessica. 2014. The polysemy of measurement. Lingua 143. 242–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roelandt, Koen. 2016a. Most or the art of compositionality. Leuven, Belgium: KU Leuven dissertation.Google Scholar
Roelandt, Koen. 2016b. Relative most compared. Paper presented at KrowFest held at CRISSP, KU Leuven Brussels Campus, April 1, 2016.Google Scholar
Rohena-Madrazo, Marcos. 2007 Superlative movement in Puerto Rican Spanish and General Spanish. NYU Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 1, edited by Levinson, Lisa & Savescu-Ciucivara, Oana, 1–32. New York, NY: NYU.Google Scholar
Rooth, Mats. 1985. Association with focus. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts at Amherst dissertation.Google Scholar
Ruys, Eddy G. 2017. Two Dutch many’s and the structure of pseudo-partitives. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 2. 1–33. Available at https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/abstract/10.5334/gjgl.276/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapp, Christopher, & Roehrs, Dorian. 2016. Head-to-modifier reanalysis: The rise of the adjectival quantifier viel and the loss of genitive case assignment. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 28. 89–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarzschild, Roger. 2002. The grammar of measurement. Proceedings of the Twelfth Semantics and Linguistics Theory Conference (SALT), ed. by Jackson, Brendan, 225–245. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar
Schwarzschild, Roger. 2006. The role of dimensions in the syntax of noun phrases. Syntax 9. 67–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1977. Some remarks on noun phrase structure. Formal syntax, ed. by Culicover, Peter, Wasow, Thomas A., & Akmajian, Adrian, 285–325. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sharvit, Yael, & Stateva, Penka. 2002. Superlative expressions, context, and focus. Linguistics and Philosophy 25. 453–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solt, Stephanie. 2011. How many most’s? Sinn und Bedeutung 15, ed. by Reich, Ingo, Horsch, Eva, & Pauly, Dennis, 565–580. Saarbrücken: Saarland University Press.Google Scholar
Solt, Stephanie. 2015. Q-adjectives and the semantics of quantity. Journal of Semantics 32. 221–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommerer, Lotte. 2012. Investigating the emergence of the definite article in Old English: About categorization, gradualness and constructions. Folia Linguistica Historica 33. 175–213.Google Scholar
Stateva, Penka. 2002. How different are different degree constructions? Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut dissertation.Google Scholar
Steensland, Lars. 2010. Material till en älvdalsk ordbok. Älvdalen: Ulum Dalska.Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna. 1986. Comparative superlatives. Papers in theoretical linguistics (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 8), ed. by Fukui, Naoki, Rapoport, Tova, & Sagey, Elizabeth, 245–265. Cambridge, MA: Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT.Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna. 2012. Compositionality without word boundaries: (The) more and (the) most. Proceedings of the Twenty Second Semantics and Linguistics Theory Conference (SALT), ed. by Chereches, Anca, Ashton, Neil, & Lutz, David, 1–25. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Teleman, Ulf. 1969. Definita och indefinita attribut i nusvenskan. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Teleman, Ulf, Hellberg, Staffan, & Andersson, Erik. 1999. Svenska akademiens grammatik [The Swedish academy grammar], vols. 1–4. Stockholm: Svenska Akademien/Norstedts.Google Scholar
Teodorescu, Viorica Alexandra. 2007. Attributive superlatives in Romanian. Pitar Moş: A building with a view. Papers in honor of Alexandra Cornilescu, ed. by Alboiu, Gabriela, Avram, Andrei, Avram, Larisa & Isac, Daniela, 249–264. Bucharest: Bucharest University Press.Google Scholar
Teodorescu, Viorica Alexandra. 2009. Modification in the noun phrase: The syntax, semantics, and pragmatics of adjectives and superlatives. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin dissertation.Google Scholar
Wellwood, Alexis. 2014. Measuring predicates. College Park, MD: University of Maryland dissertation.Google Scholar
Wellwood, Alexis. 2015. On the semantics of comparison across categories. Linguistics and Philosophy 38. 67–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, E. Cameron. 2016. Deriving the most internal reading. Sinn und Bedeutung 20, ed. by Bade, Nadine, Berzovskaya, Polina, & Schöller, Anthea, 779–797. Semantics Archive: Available at https://semanticsarchive.net/sub2015/SeparateArticles/Wilson-SuB20.pdf, accessed in June 2015.Google Scholar
Wood, Jim, Sigurðsson, Halldór, & Zanuttini, Rafaella. 2015. Partitive doubling in Icelandic and Appalachian English. Proceedings of the Fourty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS), ed. by Bui, Thuy & Özyldiz, Deniz, 217–226. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar