Introduction
The response of the marginal cryosphere to climatic variations is of significance for a much greater area of the globe than the polar high latitudes (e.g. Reference GoodyGoody, 1980; Reference WarrenWarren, 1982). Measurements of cryospheric surface albdeo, required for verification of, and comparison with, model predictions necessitate detailed knowledge of the temporal variability of the snow surface albedo. The appearance of a diurnal variation in snow albedo is a fairly widely reported phenomenon. Early measurements (CSI, 1950) showed a diurnal variation in albedo amounting to 4% of the average. Reference Sauberer and DirmhirnSauberer and Dirmhirn (1952) reported a strong diurnal variation said to be visible to the naked eye for several different sky conditions.
Several authors have reported the fact that snow albedo may exhibit hysteresis; the albedo in the morning being higher than in the afternoon for identical solar elevation (e.g. Reference HubleyHubley, 1955). We consider here several different reports of this effect and present some previously unpublished results. An attempt is made to collate the different explanations as to why albedo can be different for the same solar elevation at different times of the day and to form a concise description of the probable causes of this phenomenon.
The Diurnal Hysteresis of Snow Albedo
Reports of this phenomenon appear in Reference Sauberer and DirmhirnSauberer and Dirmhirn (1952) who describe strong variation in albedo with the minimum occurring in mid-afternoon. Reference Carroll and FitchCarroll and Fitch (1981) consider the effect of surface irregularities on the snow albedo in the Antarctic. These irregularities, or sastrugi, will introduce an azimuthal dependence of albedo, the result being that the measured albedo is different for the same solar elevation angle at different times of day. Examination of a set of radiation records for Resolute (lat. 75°N., long. 95°W) (Reference Cogley, Cogley, Henderson-Sellers and McGuffieCogley, 1983) has shown that a diurnal hysteresis of snow albedo is a fairly common phenomenon there. Typical examples are illustrated in Figure 1. This shows individual values of snow albedo derived from hourly totals of incident and reflected radiation measured over the wavelength range 0.3–3 μm. The albedo for moderate solar elevation in the morning can be seen to be noticeably higher than for the same elevation in mid-afternoon. Examination of the observed variation has shown that cycles have a 24 h period. This implies that the cause is not surface irregularities since these would result in a periodicity of 12 h. We suggest here that the variation should be attributed to the diurnal deposition and evaporation of a hoar-frost coating on the snow surface.
Reference WellerWeller (1969) established that a thin hoar-frost coating could be formed during periods of low temperatures and could be removed when the temperatures increased. At Resolute the albedo is found to be highest at times of lowest temperature and lowest at times of highest temperature. For example, on 11 May 1970 at 06.00 local time, the dry-bulb temperature was 253 K and the surface albedo 0.77. Around the time of highest temperature that day c. 17.00 the albedo was 0.71 and the temperature 258 K, although the solar elevation was the same. These observations support our theory. However we have also explored the possibility that the hysteresis effect could arise by some other means.
The hysteresis is due solely to the value of the reflected radiation being less in the afternoon than in the morning for identical solar elevation. This indicates that the effect is due to some change in the snow surface properties. The errors usually associated with radiation measurements (i.e. ±5%) are large enough to encompass the observed phenomenon. However these errors are concerned with the average deviation from the “correct” reading. It is extremely unlikely that the direction of the likely deviation from the true value for the radiation will change during the course of the day. The response of radiometers to changes in ambient temperature is insignificant for the range of temperatures involved here (personal communication from D.I. Wardle).
Reference YamanouchiYamanouchi (1983) has also examined the nature of the diurnal albedo cycle observed at Mizuho station, Antarctica. The area under the radiometer was flattened to remove the sastrugi but the diurnal loop remained (Fig. 2). Indeed at elevations of around 20° the morning-afternoon contrast in albedo is observed to increase slightly. Reference YamanouchiYamanouchi (1983) suggests that this may be due to sastrugi remaining outside the cleared area.Footnote * However we feel that the remaining effect is more probably due to a change in the microphysical properties of the snow surface, namely the diurnal sublimation of a frost coating on the surface, i.e. the same effect as we suggest is operating at Resolute.
Summary
It is clear that the diurnal hysteresis in snow albedo is due to at least two separate factors:
-
Macroscopic surface irregularities (sastrugi)
-
Microscopic morphosis of the surface during the course of the day.
Sastrugi will affect the albedo irrespective of location but the effect of hoar frost will be dependent on the strength of the diurnal cycle of solar irradiance and temperature (Reference WellerWeller, 1969). It is suggested that the dominant mechanism will be dependent on the geographical situation of the observation station and the frost effect will be most important and prevalent in regions where the diurnal cycle in irradiance is large. This will be predominantly in the lower latitudes where the presence of a cryosphere is marginal and hence the albedo of even greater climatic importance. It is important that both types of effects and their latitudinal relative magnitudes be noted when measurements of snow albedo are examined, especially where the measurements are not temporally detailed.