The Editor,
Journal of Glaciology
Sir,
Recent theoretical modelling by Reference LliboutryLliboutry (1993) has suggested that standard models of glacier sliding by regelation are flawed. Lliboutry’s analysis predicts that melting of ice in response to flow obstruction by bed protuberances will occur in an ice layer of thickness h w through which meltwater will be mobile in the vein capillary network. This contradicts the common assumption that regelation water flow is in a basal film at the ice-bed interface (e.g. Reference RobinRobin, 1976). Modelling of basal sliding is central to glaciology and bears upon the climatic interpretation of ice cores and the modelling of ice-sheet behaviour, so it is important to be able to test rival models. Lliboutry has called for field observations of h w to constrain his model but he has recognized problems in identifying h w in the field.
We suggest that observations of the dispersed facies of the basal layer (Reference LawsonLawson, 1979), which is accessible at some glacier margins (Reference LawsonLawson, 1979; Reference SugdenSugden and others, 1987) (Fig. 1), could provide the modelling constraint that Lliboutry has called for and a test of his theory. The formation of the dispersed facies has previously been attributed to regelation sliding across a rough bed (Reference LawsonLawson, 1979; Reference SugdenSugden and others, 1987) and we have previously suggested (Reference KnightKnight, 1987), in a development of an earlier model by Reference LliboutryLliboutry (1986), that water squeezed away from the bed into the vein network adjacent to bed obstacles could import fine debris with it. Models of water and solute pumping through the vein network (Reference MaderMader, 1992) are easily extended to include mobilization of fine debris.
We have carried out a series of experiments in the low-temperature laboratory that demonstrate both debris transport through the vein network of polycrystalline ice and entrainment of debris into the vein network from beneath the ice in response to a pressure gradient (Fig. 2). The selective entrainment of fine debris by grain-boundary mechanisms such as those that we have reproduced, or entrainment by theoretically conven-tional bump-related regelation and the subsequent redistribution of the debris through the vein network by recrystallization processes combined with the water flow predicted by Lliboutry’s model, could account for the detailed characteristics of the dispersed facies reported (Reference Knight, Sugden and MintyKnight and others, 1994) from the margin of the Greenland ice sheet. Our experiments confirm that selective dispersal of fine-grained debris in polycrystalline ice results from the constraint of temperature-dependent (Reference MaderMader, 1992) vein diameters. The gradual transition from “basal” to “englacial” characteristics of features such as bubble distribution at the top of the dispersed facies follows from the progressive vertical decrease in vein-meltwater flow implicit in Lliboutry’s theory. A clearly delineated boundary at the top of the layer h w would not be expected. The ambiguous isotopic signature of the dispersed facies (Reference SugdenSugden and others, 1987) can be explained not only by isotopic exchange with the mineral component (Reference Souchez, Lemmens, R, Tison, J and DSouchez and others, 1990) but also by the sub-crystalline scale of melting, refreezing and water transfer within the capillary system. If Lliboutry’s zone h w does exist, then the dispersed facies may be a visible consequence of it.
In order to use field exposures of the dispersed facies to calibrate h w, account must be taken of diagenetic flow-related thickness variation within the layer (Reference Boulton, Wright and MoseleyBoulton, 1975; Reference Knight, Sugden and MintyKnight and others, 1994). Nevertheless, estimates of h w, sufficiently accurate to test and constrain Lliboutry’s model should be possible on the basis of field observations at ice-margin sites and from deep cores.
Acknowledgements
Our experimental work was funded by grant GR9/1110 from the U.K. Natural Environment Research Council (NERC). Field observations on which the work is based were funded by the Royal Society.
The accuracy of references in the text and in this list is the responsibility of the authors, to whom queries should be addressed.