Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T03:55:37.822Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

letter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Roger Leb. Hooke
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455. U.S.A.
X.Q. Gao
Affiliation:
Meteorology Department, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
Т.Н. Jacka
Affiliation:
Australian Antarctic Division. Kingston, Tasmania 7050. Australia
R.A. Souchez
Affiliation:
Université Libre de Bruxelles. Laboratoire de Géomorphologie,Avenue F.D. Roosevelt 50,В-1050 Brussels, Belgium
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Correspondence
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1988

The Editor, Journal of Glaciology

Sir,

That Wisconsin-aged ice is mechanically softer than Holocene ice, at least in the Northern Hemisphere, is widely recognized. This characteristic was apparently first observed in bore-hole deformation experiments on Barnes Ice Cap, Baffin Island, Canada (Reference HookeHooke, 1973). At comparable stresses, shear-deformation rates in a layer of bubbly white ice at the base of Barnes Ice Cap were found to be ˜2.5 times faster than in overlying blue ice. Subsequently, stable-isotope data demonstrated that the Pleistocene-Holocene transition lay at the boundary between the white and blue ice (Reference HookeHooke, 1976; Reference Hooke and ClausenHooke and Clausen, 1982). Additional bore-hole deformation studies in the late 1970s and early 1980s confirmed this rheological contrast, and suggested that the white ice might deform as much as 25 times faster than the blue ice (Reference Hooke and HansonHooke and Hanson, 1986). During this same time period, bore-hole deformation experiments on Devon Ice Cap (Reference PatersonPaterson, 1977, p. 53–54), on Aggasiz Ice Cap (Reference Fisher and KoernerFisher and Koerner, 1986), and at Dye 3 in south Greenland (Reference Jensen and GundestrupDahl-Jensen and Gundestrup, 1987) documented a similar softness of Pleistocene ice.

Because the white ice on Barnes Ice Cap was exceptionally bubbly, particularly in comparison with the overlying blue ice, its softness was originally attributed to the high bubble content (Reference HookeHooke, 1973, p. 432–33). The contrast in bubble content was sufficient to produce a density difference of 0.05 Mg/m3 which, based on extrapolation of creep data from snow and low-density ice (Reference Mellor, Smith and ŌuraMellor and Smith, 1967, fig. 4), seemed to be quantitatively sufficient to explain the contrast in rheology. Thus, although Reference PatersonPaterson (1977, p. 54) drew an analogy between the softness of the Pleistocene ice in Devon and Barnes Ice Caps, Reference HookeHooke (1981, p. 670) argued that different processes must be involved, as no corresponding bubble or density contrast was found in the Devon Island ice core.

Table I. Summary of chemical analyses of barnes ice cap ice, ppm (analyses by r.a. souchez in 1973 and 1974)

Recent experimental results obtained by Gao and Jacka (in press) now suggest that Hooke’s interpretation was wrong. Using tests in unconfined uniaxial compression, Gao and Jacka found that there was no significant change in minimum strain-rate over a density range from 0.83 to 0.91 Mg/m3 (Fig. 1). This suggests that the rheological contrast between Pleistocene and Holocene ice in Barnes Ice Cap should be attributed to factors other than the density contrast. In particular, the cause of this rheological contrast in Barnes Ice Cap may be the same as the cause in the Devon and Aggasiz Ice Caps and Greenland ice sheet. If future laboratory tests in simple shear, preferably extending to tertiary creep, should fail to show a contrast in rheology over the density range mentioned, this interpretation would be strengthened.

Fig. 1. Variation in minimum octahedral shear strain-rate with initial ice density (modified from Gao and Jacka (in press)). Slopes of solid and dashed lines are based on tests of Mellor and Smith (1966) and Reference Haefeli and SuryHaefeli and von Sury (1975), respectively.

It is worth noting, however, that the change in fabric and crystal size across the Pleistocene-Holocene boundary is quite dramatic in Barnes Ice Cap (Reference Hooke and HudlestonHooke and Hudleston, 1980), and this is undoubtedly partially responsible for the rheological contrast. On the other hand, it is also worth noting that there is a chemical contrast between the Pleistocene and Holocene ice in Barnes Ice Cap similar to that found elsewhere at the Pleistocene-Holocene transition (Table I). These factors need to be taken into consideration in our attempts to explain this puzzling rheological contrast.

Roger Leb. Hooke

Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455. U.S.A.

X.Q. Gao

Meteorology Department, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia

Т.Н. Jacka

Australian Antarctic Division. Kingston, Tasmania 7050. Australia

R.A. Souchez

Université Libre de Bruxelles. Laboratoire de Géomorphologie,Avenue F.D. Roosevelt 50,В-1050 Brussels, Belgium

18 May 1988

References

Jensen, D. Gundestrup, N.S.. 1987 Constitutive properties of ice at Dye 3, Greenland. International Association of Hydrological Sciences Publication 170 (Symposium at Vancouver 1987 – The Physical Basis of Ice Sheet Modelling), 3143.Google Scholar
Fisher, D.A. Koerner, R.M.. 1986 On the special rheological properties of ancient microparticle–laden Northern Hemisphere ice as derived from bore–hole and core measurements. J. Glaciol., 32(112), 501510.Google Scholar
Gao, X.Q. Jacka, T.H. In press. Laboratory studies on the effect of density on ice minimum creep rate. ANARE Res. Notes.Google Scholar
Haefeli, R. von Sury, H.. 1975 Strain and stress in snow, firn and ice along the EGIG profile of the Greenland ice sheet. International Association of Hydrological Sciences Publication 114 (Symposium at Grindelwald 1974 – Snow Mechanics), 342352.Google Scholar
Hooke, R. Leb 1973 Structure and flow in the margin of the Barnes Ice Cap, Baffin Island N.W.T., Canada. J. Glacial. 12(66), 423438.Google Scholar
Hooke, R. Leb 1976 Pleistocene ice at the base of the Barnes Ice Cap, Baffin Island N.W.T., Canada. J. Glaciol. 17(75), 4959.Google Scholar
Hooke, R. Leb 1981 Flow law for polycrystalline ice in glaciers: comparison of theoretical predictions, laboratory data, and field measurements. Rev. Geophys. Space Phvs. 19(4), 664672.Google Scholar
Hooke, R. Leb. Clausen, H.B.. 1982 Wisconsin and Holocene δ18O variations, Barnes Ice Cap, Canada. Geol. Soc Am. Bull. 93(8), 784789.Google Scholar
Hooke, R.Leb Hanson, B.. 1986 Borehole deformation experiments, Barnes Ice Cap, Canada. Cold Reg. Sei. Technol. 12(3), 261276.Google Scholar
Hooke, R.Leb Hudleston, P.J.. 1980 Ice fabrics in a vertical flow plane, Barnes Ice Cap, Canada. J. Glaciol. 25(92), 195214.Google Scholar
Mellor, M. Smith, J.H.. 1967 Creep of snow and ice. In Ōura, H., ed. Physics of Snow and Ice. International Conference on Low Temperature Science … 1966 Sapporo, Japan. Proceedings, Vol. 1. Pt. 2. Sapporo, Hokkaido University. Institute of Low Temperature Science, 843855.Google Scholar
Paterson, W.S.B. 1977 Secondary and tertiary creep of glacier ice as measured by borehole closure rates. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys., 15(1), 4755.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table I. Summary of chemical analyses of barnes ice cap ice, ppm (analyses by r.a. souchez in 1973 and 1974)

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Variation in minimum octahedral shear strain-rate with initial ice density (modified from Gao and Jacka (in press)). Slopes of solid and dashed lines are based on tests of Mellor and Smith (1966) and Haefeli and von Sury (1975), respectively.