Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:30:15.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thoinarmostria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2013

Marcus N. Tod
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In my commentary upon an inscription discovered near the village of Remoustapha in south-western Messenia, and published in the J.H.S. xxv. (1905), pp. 49 foll., I discussed the occurrences of the title θοιναρμόστρια, of which I gave what I then believed to be a complete list. Subsequently, however, a new inscription containing the term has been discovered and published, while a second still awaits publication, and I have recently noticed that I had overlooked an important text of Messene in which the word is twice found (G.D.I. 4650). I therefore take this opportunity of correcting my error and of supplementing my note, especially as the articles on the θοιναρμόστρια in the Real-Encyclopädie of Pauly-Kroll and in Roscher's Lexikon have not yet appeared. Thanks to the kindness of Professor W. Kolbe of Rostock, the editor of the Laconian and Messenian section of the Inscriptiones Graecae, I am enabled to give references to the numbers which the inscriptions will bear in the Corpus, this volume of which is now in the press and will, it is hoped, be published before the close of the current year. For the aid thus received and for the permission to refer to the still unpublished text I.G. v. 1. 592 I here tender to Dr. Kolbe my sincere thanks.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Hellenic Studies , Volume 32 , November 1912 , pp. 100 - 104
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies 1912

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Nor has Dar.-Sagl. yet reached this point. Van Herwerden's account of the word (Lex. Graec. Suppletorium 2, 1910) is marred by omissions and misprints.

2 For the ἱϵροί and ἱϵραί, who take a prominent part in the cult at Andania, see Cardinali, G., Rendiconti dei Lincei, xvii. 165 foll.Google Scholar, where, however, the evidence of J.H.S. xxv. 49 foll. is overlooked.

3 See his notes G.D.I. 4522, 4496. The evidence for the worship of Δαμία (Δαμοία) in Laconia is collected and discussed by Wide, , Lakonische Kulte, pp. 219Google Scholar foll.

4 See the passages cited by Wide, , Lakonische Kulte, pp. 136Google Scholar foll.

5 G.D.I. 4416; S.M.C. 440. A new portion of this inscription was found in 1907 and is published in B.S.A. xiii. 174 foll. For the restoration of ll. 35–42 see B.S.A. xiii. 178.

6 Fraenkel's statement (I.G. iv. 768, note) that No. XI teste Wilhelmo circa initia saec. tertii est exaratus is mistaken: Wilhelm dates it um die Wende den dritten und zweiten Jahrhunderts v. Chr. (Ath. Mitt. xvi. 352).

7 Wilhelm interprets Κλαικοφόρος as the name of a hero, comparing an inscription from the Asclepieum of Epidaurus, ἤρωος Κλαικοφόρου (I.G. iv. 1300), to which we may now add a Troezenian text consisting of the same two words (I.G. iv. 768). Meister, (G.D.I. 4650Google Scholar, note) sees in the κλαικοφὁρος (=κλῃδοῦχος κλειδοῦχος) a temple functionary, as in Aesch. Suppl. 291, Eurip., I.T. 131Google Scholar; cf. G.D.I. 4689, ll. 90 foll. A κλειδοφὁρος is found amongst the temple officials at Notium in B.C.H. xviii. 216 foll. No. 3, l. 7.

8 Kolbe takes it as certain that the sanctuary to which this stone originally belonged was not situated at, or close to, Remoustapha, (Sitzb. d berl. Akad. 1905, p. 54)Google Scholar.

9 Cf B.S.A. xvi. p. 55, No. 2, ll. 10, 11.