Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:48:44.235Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Determination of the minimum time of praziquantel therapy required for the in vitro treatment of protoscoleces of Echinococcus granulosus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

D. L. Morris
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, University Hospital, Nottingham, NG7 2UH
D. H. Taylor
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, University Hospital, Nottingham, NG7 2UH
D. Daniels
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Keele, Staffs, ST5 5BG, England
E. M. Riley
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Keele, Staffs, ST5 5BG, England
K. S. Richards
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Keele, Staffs, ST5 5BG, England

Abstract

Ovine and equine protoscoleces of Echinococcus granulosus were cultured for 26 days with our without praziquantel and viability assessed, by eosin exclusion, for cultures in various drug concentrations (50, 250 and 500 μg/l) and periods of exposure (1, 3 or 7 days (d)) before removing/‘rescuing’ to drug-free medium. Drug efficacy was proportional to drug concentration and to length of exposure. At higher drug concentrations shorter exposures were required to produce the effect of continuous drug treatment, 1d therapy at 500 μg/l killing 96% ovine protoscoleces by day 14 whereas 7d therapy at 50 μg/l was required to produce a similar effect. Equine protoscoleces appeared marginally less susceptible than those of ovine origin. The relevance of the results in the need for peri-operative prophylaxis against spilled protoscoleces in man is discussed.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Amir-Jahed, A. K., Fardia, R., Farzad, A. & Barkshandeh, K. (1975) Clinical Echinococcosis. Annals of Surgery, 182, 541546.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chinnery, J. B. & Morris, D. L. (1986) Effect of albendazole sulphoxide on viability of hydatid protoscoleces. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 80, 815817.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, D. L. & Chinnery, J. B. (1987) A comparison of the effects of albendazole, its sulphone metabolite and mebendazole on viability of Echinococcus granulosus scoleces in an in vitro culture system. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 81, 804806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, D. L., Richards, K. S. & Chinnery, J. B. (1986) Protoscolicidal effect of praziquantel–in vitro and electron microscopy studies on Echinococcus granulosus. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 18, 687691.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, D. L., Taylor, D., Daniels, D. & Richards, K. S. (1987) Determination of minimum effective concentrations of praziquantel in in vitro cultures of protoscoleces of Echinococcus granulosus. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 81, 494497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mottaghion, H. & Saidi, F (1978) Post operative recurrence of hydatid disease. British Journal of Surgery, 65, 237242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patzschke, K., Putter, J., Wegner, L. A., Horster, F. A. & Diekmann, H. W. (1979) Serum concentrations and renal excretion in humans after oral administration of praziquantel–results of three determination methods. European Journal of Drug Metabolism & Pharmacokinetics, 3, 149156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogan, M. T. & Richards, K. S. (1986) In vitro development of hydatid cysts from posterior bladders and ruptured blood capsules of equine Echinococcus granulosus. Parasitology, 92, 379390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, R. C. A., Reynoldson, J. A. & Riddler, C. R. (1986) Praziquantel adversely affects protoscoleces of Echinococcus granulosus in vitro. Journal of Helminthology, 60, 279286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed