Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T01:31:46.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Host age and the growth and fecundity of Hymenolepis diminuta in the rat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

R. J. Quinnell
R. J. Quinnell*
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, The Molteno Institute, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EE, UK
*
*Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Five, 20, and 80 cysticercoid infections of Hymenolepis diminuta were established in 1-, 2- and 5-month-old male Wistar rats. Worm numbers, dry weights and egg outputs were determined on day 28 post infection. Worm recovery was found to be independent of cysticercoid dose in 1-month-old rats, but density-dependent in older rats. Density dependence affected both worm dry weight and egg production in all 3 age classes of host studied. However, at the highest dose both dry weight and egg production were significantly decreased in 2- and 5-month-old rats compared with 1-month-old rats. The results cannot be explained solely in terms of competition for a resource, and suggest that immunological mechanisms may have an important role in the “crowding effect”.

Keywords

Hymenolepis diminutacrowding effectimmunitycompetitionhost age
Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 62 , Issue 2 , June 1988 , pp. 158 - 162
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andreassen, J. (1981) Immunity to adult cestodes (Workshop Proceedings, EMOP 3). Parasitology, 82, 153–159.Google Scholar
Andreassen, J., Hinsdbo, O. & Hesselberg, C. A. (1974) Immunity to Hymenolepis diminuta in rats: destrobilation and expulsion in primary infections, its suppression by cortisone treatment and increased resistance to secondary infections. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Congress of Parasitology, Vol. 2, p. 1056. Facta Publication, Vienna.Google Scholar
Andreassen, J. & Hopkins, C. A. (1980) Immunologically mediated rejection of Hymenolepis diminuta by its normal host, the rat. Journal of Parasitology, 66, 898–903.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beaudoin, R. L. (1965) Action of selected antibiotics on Hymenolepis diminuta in the rat host. Journal of Parasitology, 51 (Sec. 2), 34.Google Scholar
Boddington, M. J. & Mettrick, D. F. (1981) Production and reproduction in Hymenolepis diminuta (Platyhelminthes: Cestoda). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 59, 1962–1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, A. C. (1939) The effects of number and age of worms on development of primary and secondary infections with Hymenolepis diminuta in rats, and an investigation into the true nature of ‘premunition’ in tapeworm infections. American Journal of Hygiene, 29, 105–114.Google Scholar
Chappell, L. H. & Pike, A. W. (1976) Loss of Hymenolepis diminuta from the rat. International Journal of Parasitology, 6, 333–339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choromanski, L. (1980) Humoral and cellular responses in mice and rats infected with Hymenolepis diminuta. Bulletin de l'Academie Polonaise des Sciences, Sciences Biologiques, 28, 707–713.Google Scholar
Hager, A. (1941) Effects of dietary modifications of host rats on the tapeworm Hymenolepis diminuta. Iowa State College Journal of Science, 15, 127–153.Google Scholar
Hindsbo, O., Andreassen, J. & Hesselberg, C. A. (1975) Immunity to Hymenolepis diminuta in the rat. Norwegian Journal of Zoology, 23, 197.Google Scholar
Hindsbo, O., Andreassen, J. & Ruitenberg, J. (1982) Immunological and histopathological reactions of the rat against the tapeworm Hymenolepis diminuta and the effects of antithymocyte serum. Parasite Immunology, 4, 59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, C. A. (1980) Immunity and Hymenolepis diminuta. In: Biology of the Tapeworm Hymenolepis diminuta (editor, Arai, H. P.) pp. 551–614. Academic Press: New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Insler, G. D. & Roberts, L. S. (1980) Developmental physiology of cestodes. XVI. Effects of certain excretory products on incorporation of [3H] thymidine into DNA of Hymenolepis diminuta. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 211, 55–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarrett, E. E. E., Urquart, G. M. & Douthwaite, R. M. (1969) Immunological unresponsiveness to helminth parasites. II. Antibody response and hypersensitivity reaction associated with Nippostrongylus brasiliensis infection in young rats. Experimental Parasitology, 24, 270–278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keymer, A. E. & Anderson, R. M. (1979) The dynamics of infection of Tribolium confusum by Hymenolepis diminuta: the influence of infective-stage density and spatial distribution. Parasitology, 79, 195–207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keymer, A. E., Crompton, D. W. T. & Singhvi, A. (1983) Mannose and the ‘crowding effect’ of Hymenolepis in rats. International Journal for Parasitology, 13, 561–570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
M.A.F.F. (1977) Manual of Veterinary Parasitological Laboratory Techniques. Technical Bulletin No. 18, H.M.S.O., London.Google Scholar
Nesheim, M. C., Crompton, D. W. T., Arnold, S. & Barnard, D. (1977) Dietary relations between Moniliformis (Acanthocephala) and laboratory rats. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 197, 363–383.Google ScholarPubMed
Pike, A. W. & Chappell, L. H. (1981) Hymenolepis diminuta: Worm loss and worm weight loss in long-term infections of the rat. Experimental Parasitology, 51, 35–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Read, C. P. (1951) The ‘crowding effect’ in tapeworm infections. Journal of Parasitology, 37, 174–178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Read, C. P. (1959) The role of carbohydrates in the biology of cestodes. VIII. Some conclusions and hypotheses. Experimental Parasitology, 8, 365–382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Read, C. P. & Rothman, A. H. (1957) The role of carbohydrates in the biology of cestodes. I. The effect of dietary carbohydrate quality on the size of Hymenolepis diminuta. Experimental Parasitology, 6, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rickard, M. D. (1983) Immunity. In: Biology of the Eucestoda (editors, Arme, C. & Pappas, P. W.) Vol. 2, pp. 539–579. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Roberts, L. S. (1961) The influence of population density on patterns and physiology of growth in Hymenolepis diminuta (Cestoda: Cyclophyllidea) in the definitive host. Experimental Parasitology, 11, 332–371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, L. S. (1966) Developmental physiology of cestodes. I. Host dietary carbohydrate and the ‘crowding effect’ in Hymenolepis diminuta. Experimental Parasitology, 18, 305–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, L. S. (1980) Development of Hymenolepis diminuta in its definitive host. In: Biology of the Tapeworm Hymenolepis diminuta (editor, Arai, H. P.) pp. 357–423. Academic Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wakelin, D. (1986) Genetic and other contraints on resistance to infection with gastrointestinal nematodes. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 80, 742–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zavras, E. T. & Roberts, L. S. (1984) Developmental physiology of cestodes. XVIII. Characterization of putative crowding factors in Hymenolepis diminuta. Journal of Parasitology, 70, 937–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zavras, E. T. & Roberts., L. S. (1985) Developmental physiology of cestodes. XIX. Cyclic nucleotides and the identity of putative crowding factors in Hymenolepis diminuta. Journal of Parasitology, 71, 96–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar