Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:01:48.328Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A comparative study of the protein content of some helminths and the suitability of assay methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

S. M. A. Abidi
Affiliation:
Section of Parasitology, Department of Zoology, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh–202 002, India
W. A. Nizami*
Affiliation:
Section of Parasitology, Department of Zoology, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh–202 002, India
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed.

Abstract

The protein content of fresh homogenates and their corresponding TCA precipitated fractions of 10 different species of helminths was estimated by the methods of Lowry et al. and Spector using the Folin phenol reagent and Coomassie brilliant blue G-250 respectively. The former method gives exaggerated values as compared to the latter method. The parasite phenols, phenolic proteins and catecholamines could be responsible for interference in the Lowry's procedure. The TCA non-precipitable moieties also give colour only with the Folin phenol assay. The pronounced intra-specific differences in the total protein content of helminths reflect their metabolic variations and adaptations. Habitat does not appear to influence the protein content of parasites, however, the effect of host variation was evident in the pouched amphistome G. crumenifer. It is concluded that the dye binding method gives more consistent results and it can be conveniently applied to crude tissue homogenates of helminths.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ahmad, H. & Saleemuddin, M. (1981) Protein estimation in plant tissue homogenates using Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 assay. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, 19, 280282.Google Scholar
Arfin, M. & Nizami., W. A. (1986a) Chemical nature and mode of stabilization of egg-shell proteins of some digenetic trematodes. Helminthologia, 23, 157164.Google Scholar
Arfin, M. & Nizami, W. A. (1986b) Chemical nature and mode of stabilization of eggshell/capsule of some cyclophyllidean cestodes. Journal of Helminthology, 60, 105112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradford, M. M. (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry, 72, 248254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darbre, A. (1986) Practical protein chemistry—A Handbook. John Wiley & Sons. New York.Google Scholar
Dhandayuthapani., S., Balasubramanian, M. P., Nellaiappan, K. & Ramalingam, K. (1983) Isoenzyme pattern of lactate and malate dehydrogenases of Gastrothylax crumenifer (Trematoda: Amphistomatidae) from different host. Veterinary Parasitology, 12, 6569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L. & Randall, R. J. (1951) Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 193, 265275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saleemuddin, M. & Ahmad, H. (1984) Protein estimation using Coomassie Blue G-250 and related dyes. Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 43, 324328.Google Scholar
Smyth, J. D. & Halton, D. W. (1983) The physiology of trematodes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, London, New York.Google Scholar
Smyth, J. D., McManus, D. P. (1989) The physiology and biochemistry of cestodes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J. (1981) Biometry-The principles and practice of statistics in biological research. Second edition. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York.Google Scholar
Spector, T. (1978) Refinement of the Coomassie Blue method of protein quantitation. Analytical Biochemistry, 86, 142146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed