Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:23:58.769Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Development of Proteocephalus torulosus in the intermediate host under experimental conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

T. Scholz
T. Scholz
Affiliation:
Institute of Parasitology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Branis˘ovská 31, 370 05 České Bude˘jovice, Czech Republic
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The development of the tapeworm Proteocephalus torulosus (Batsch, 1786) (Cestoda: Proteocephalidae), a parasite of cyprinid fish, was studied in the intermediate host under experimental conditions. The eggs of P. torulosus were typified by a relatively small outer envelope (hyaline membrane) and a thick middle layer surrounding the oncosphere. Incubation of P. torulosus eggs at different temperatures revealed the ability of some oncospheres to survive and remain infective to the intermediate host for up to 5 weeks at 5–7°C, 12 days at 10–12°C, and 8 days at 20–22°C. Of 8 copepod species used in these experiments, complete development of larvae was observed only in Cyclops strenuus. Growth was completed in 9–12 days at 20–22°C and four weeks at 9–10°C. During development the cercomer was not observed. The infectivity of larvae from C. strenuus for the definitive hosts, cyprinid fish, was very low and only one chub of 26 fish used for feeding experiments (21 chub, Leuciscus cephalus, 3 bleak, Alburnoides bipunctatus, 1 rudd, Scardinius erythrophthalmus—all the family Cyprinidae, and 1 loach, Noemacheilus barbatulus—the family Cobitidae) became infected.

Keywords

Proteocephalus torulosusCestodadevelopmentCyclops strenuusmorphogenesisLeuciscus cephalus
Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 67 , Issue 4 , December 1993 , pp. 316 - 324
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anikieva, L. V., Malakhova, R. P. & Ieshko, E. P. (1983) Ecological analysis of parasites of coregonid fish, 168 pp. Nauka: Leningrad. (In Russian).Google Scholar
Chubb, J. C. (1982) Seasonal occurrence of helminths of freshwater fishes. Part IV. Adult Cestoda, Nematoda and Acanthocephala. Advances in Parasitology, 20, 1–292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, E. H. (1967) Parasite fauna of the fish of the River Lugg, a tributary of the river Wye, Herefordshire. Ph.D. thesis, University of Liverpool. (Quoted after Chubb, 1982).Google Scholar
Doby, J. M. & Jarecka, L. (1966) Complément à la connaissance de la morphologie et de la biologie de Proteocephalus macrocephalus (Creplin 1825), cestode parasite de l'anguille. Annales de Parasitologie Humaine et Comparée, 41, 429–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubinina, M. N. (1952) Some remarks on the classification of tapeworms of the family Proteocephalidae and their distribution in the USSR. Parazitologicheskiy sbornik Zoologicheskogo Instituta AN SSSR, 14, 281–302. (In Russian).Google Scholar
Dubinina, M. N. (1987) Class Cestoda Rudolphi, 1808. In: Key to the Parasites of Freshwater Fishes (editor, Bauer, O. N.), Vol. 3, pp. 5–76. Nauka: Leningrad. (In Russian).Google Scholar
Fischer, H. (1968) The life cycle of Proteocephalus fluviatilis Bangham (Cestoda) from smallmouth bass. Micropterus dolomieui Lacépède. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 46, 569–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. S. (1964) On the biology of Proteocephalus parallacticus MacLulich (Cestoda) in Algonquin Park, Canada. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 42, 387–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freze, V. I. (1965) Proteocephalids—tapeworm helminths of fish, amphibians and reptiles. Essentials of Cestodology, 5, 540 pp. Nauka: Moscow. (In Russian).Google Scholar
Gruber, A. (1878) Ein neuer Cestoden-Wirt. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 1, 74–75.Google Scholar
Hunter, G. W. (1928) Contributions to the life-history of Proteocephalus ambloplitis (Leidy). Journal of Parasitology, 14, 229–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, G. W. (1929) Life-history studies on Proteocephalus pinguis La Rue. Parasitology, 21, 487–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, C. R. & Hine, P. M. (1969) Population biology of the cestode Proteocephalus torulosus (Batsch) in dace Leuciscus leuciscus (L.) of the River Avon. Journal of Fish Biology, 1, 209–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuczkowski, S. (1925) Rozwój w rodzaju Ichthyotaenia Lönnb. Przyczynek do teorji cerkomerów na podstawie badan doswiadczalnych. Bulletin de l'academia Polonaise de Sciences, Série B, 423–446.Google Scholar
La Rue, R. B. (1914) A revision of the cestode family Proteocephalidae, Illinois Biological Monographs, 1, No. 1–2, pp. 3–351.Google Scholar
Meggitt, F. J. (1914) The structure and life history of a tapeworm (Ichthyotaenia filicollis Rud.) in the stickleback. Proceedings of the Zoological Society, London, 1914, 113–138.Google Scholar
Mrázek, A. (1891) Pr˘íspe˘vky k vývojezpytu ne˘kterých tasemnic ptačích. Ve˘stník Královské c˘eské spolec˘nosti nauk, 97–131.Google Scholar
Mrázek, A. (1917) O larve˘ tasemnice Ichthyotaenia torulosa. Sborník Zoologický, 1, 11–17.Google Scholar
Priemer, J. (1980) Zum Lebenszyklus von Proteocephalus neglectus (Cestoda) aus Regenbogenforellen Salmo gairdneri. Angewandte Parasitologie, 21, 125–133.Google ScholarPubMed
Priemer, J. (1982) Bestimmung von Fischbandwürmern der Gattung Proteocephalus (Cestoda; Proteocephalidae) in Mitteleuropa. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 208, 244–264.Google Scholar
Priemer, J. (1987) On the life-cycle of Proteocephalus exiguus (Cestoda) from Salmo gairdneri (Pisces). Helminthologia 24, 75–85.Google Scholar
Prouza, A. (1977) Vývojový cyklus tasemnice Proteocephalus neglectus La Rue, 1911. M.Sc. Thesis, Purkyne˘ University, Brno.Google Scholar
Prouza, A. (1978) Vývojový cyklus tasemnice Proteocephalus neglectus La Rue, 1911. Sborník ve˘decých prací ÚSVÚ, 8, 56–63.Google Scholar
Scholz, T. (1989a) Amphilinida and Cestoda, parasites of fish in Czechoslovakia. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium, Brno, 23, No. 4, 56 pp.Google Scholar
Scholz, T. (1989b) On the ecology of the cestode Proteocephalus torulosus (Batsch, 1786) in chub (Leuciscus cephalus L.) from the river Rokytná, Czechoslovakia, Helminthologia, 26, 275–285.Google Scholar
Scholz, T. (1991) Studies on the development of the cestode Proteocephalus neglectus La Rue, 1911 (Cestoda: Proteocephalidae) under experimental conditions. Folia Parasitologica, 38, 39–55.Google Scholar
Scholz, T. & Ergens, R. (1990) Cestodes of fishes from Mongolia. Acta Societatis Zoologicae Bohemoslovacae, 54, 217–304.Google Scholar
Sysoev, A. V. (1983) The composition of intermediate hosts of Proteocephalus torulosus (Batsch) (Cestoda: Proteocephalidae) and the dynamics of invasion of Copepoda with this parasite under conditions in Karelia. Helminthologia, 20, 97–102.Google Scholar
Wagner, E. D. (1954) The life history of Proteocephalus tumidocollus Wagner. 1953 (Cestoda). in rainbow trout. Journal of Parasitology, 40, 489–498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wagner, O. (1917) Über den Entwicklung¯sgang und Bau einer Fischtaenie (Ichthyotaenia torulosus Batsch). Jena Zeitschrift für Naturwissenschaft, 55, 1–66.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, M. (1956) Wyniki sztucznego zarażenia Cyclops vicinus Ulj. larwami Proteocephalus percae (O. F. Müller, 1780). Acta Parasitologica Polonica, 4, 89–100.Google Scholar
Wootten, R. (1974) Studies on the life cycle and development of Proteocephalus percae (Müller) (Cestoda: Proteocephalidae). Journal of Helminthology, 48, 269–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar