Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:47:01.564Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Eosinophilia in chimeric mice infected with Toxocara canis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

Kazuo Sugane
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, School of Medicine, Shinshu University, Asahi 3–1–1 Matsumoto City, Japan
Tadashi Matsuura
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, School of Medicine, Shinshu University, Asahi 3–1–1 Matsumoto City, Japan

Abstract

A marked strain variation in eosinophilia following oral infection with Toxocara canis eggs was observed in mice. Mutual radiation chimeras between high and low responder mice in terms of eosinophilia were made and compared with the respective donor and recipient for eosinophilia after the infection. As a result, the degree and time course of eosinophilia in chimeric mice were similar to those in donors. The result suggested that genes which regulate inheritance of the trait, marked eosinophilia in T. canis-infected mice, might be expressed in bone marrow derived cells.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ackerman, S. J., Gleich, G. J., Weller, P. F. & Ottesen, E. A. (1981) Eosinophilia and elevated serum levels of eosinophil major basic protein and Charcot-Leyden crystal protein after treatment of patients with Bancroft's filariasis. Journal of Immunology, 127, 10931098.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ansari, A. & Williams, J. F. (1976) The eosinophilic response of the rat to infection with Taenia taeniaeformis. Journal of Parasitology, 62, 728736.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartelmez, S. H., Dodge, W. H. & Bass, D. A. (1980) Differential regulation of spleen cell-mediated eosinophil and neutrophil-macrophage production. Blood, 55, 489493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cline, M. J. & Golde, D. W. (1979) Controlling the production of blood cells. Blood 53,157162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colley, D. C. (1974) Variations in peripheral blood eosinophil levels in normal and Schistosoma manisoni-infected mice. Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine, 83, 871876.Google ScholarPubMed
Discombe, G. (1946) Criteria of eosinophilia. Lancet, i, 195196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, J. G., Hale, C. & Liew, F. Y. (1980) Genetically determined susceptibility to Leishmania tropica infection is expressed by haemopoietic donor cells in mouse radiation chimeras. Nature, 288, 161162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onoe, K., Fernandes, G. & Good, R. A. (1980) Humoral and cell-mediated immune responses in fully allogeneic bone marrow chimera in mice. Journal of Experimental Medicine, 151, 115130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oshima, T. (1961) Standardization of techniques for infecting mice with Toxocara canis and observations on the migration routes of the larvae. Journal of Parasitology, 47, 652656.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sugane, K. & Oshima, T. (1982) Eosinophilia, granuloma formation and migratory behavior of larvae in the congenitally athymic mouse infected with Toxocara canis. Parasite Immunology, 4, 307318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sugane, K. & Oshima, T. (1984a) Induction of peripheral blood eosinophilia in mice by excretory and secretory antigen of Toxocara canis larvae. Journal of Helminthology, 58, 143147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sugane, K. & Oshima, T. (1984b) Interrelationship of eosinophilia and IgE antibody production to larval ES antigen in Toxocara canis infected mice. Parasite Immunology, 6, 409420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vadas, M. A. (1981) Cyclophosphamide pretreatment induces eosinophilia to nonparasite antigens. Joiurnal of Immunology, 127, 20832086.Google ScholarPubMed
Vadas, M. A. (1982) Genetic control of eosinophilia in mice: Gene(s) expressed in bone marrow-derived cells control high responsiveness. Journal of Immunology, 128, 691695.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wakelin, D. & Donachie, A. M. (1981) Genetic control of immunity to Trichinella spiralis. Donor bone marrow cells determine responses to infection in mouse radiation chimeras. Immunology, 43, 787792.Google Scholar
Wakelin, D. & Donachie, A. (1983) Genetic control of eosinophilia. Mouse strain variation in response to antigens of parasite origin. Clinical and Experimental Immunology, 51, 239246.Google ScholarPubMed