Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:30:03.751Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic control of acquired resistance to Heligmosomoides polygyrus: overcoming genetically determined weak responder status by strategic immunization with ivermectin-abbreviated infections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

F.N. Wahid  and
J.M. Behnke
F.N. Wahid
Affiliation:
Experimental Parasitology Research Group, Department of Life Science, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
J.M. Behnke*
Affiliation:
Experimental Parasitology Research Group, Department of Life Science, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
*
*Author for correspondence.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The induction of acquired resistance to H. polygyrus, following treatment of mice by a 6 day immunizing infection abbreviated with the anthelmintic drug ivermectin (6d I-AI), was investigated. Four worms were sufficient to elicit >80% protection against challenge and immunizing infections >50 worms generated >95% protection in female NIH mice. A few worms were recovered during the second week from immunized challenged mice but these were rapidly expelled from the gut lumen. Treatment with hydrocortisone from day 10 postinfection, permitted worm burdens to accumulate over the following 2 weeks. The 6d I-AI protocol enabled females of strains previously designated as weak responders to develop potent acquired resistance to challenge (CBA mice showed >90% protection), although weak responder strain male mice were not significantly protected. Delaying treatment with ivermectin by as little as 24 h resulted in poorer expression of acquired resistance. A positive correlation between the increasing interval from infection to treatment with ivermectin and worm burdens after challenge, and the negative correlation with IgGl antibody responses after challenge indicated that the immunodepressive activities of 7 day and older worms down-regulated local intestinal immune responses. Mice characterized by weak responder phenotype were significantly more sensitive to downregulation than mouse strains showing strong responder phenotype. In consequence, optimal timing of treatment with anthelmintics during exposure to the immunizing infection, intending to minimize exposure to the immunodepressive stages of the parasite, is sufficient to overcome reported genetic constraints on the development of resistance in this system.

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 70 , Issue 2 , June 1996 , pp. 159 - 168
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Behnke, J.M. (1987) Evasion of immunity by nematode parasites causing chronic infections. Advances in Parasitology 26, 1–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Behnke, J.M. & Parish, H.A. (1979a) Nematospiroides dubius: arrested development of larvae in immune mice. Experimental Parasitology 47, 116–127.Google Scholar
Behnke, J.M. & Parish, H.A. (1979b) Expulsion of Nematospiroides dubius from the intestine of mice treated with immune serum. Parasite Immunology 1, 13–26.Google Scholar
Behnke, J.M. & Robinson, M. (1985) Genetic control of immunity to Nematospiroides dubius: a 9-day anthelmintic abbreviated immunizing regime which separates weak and strong responder strains of mice. Parasite Immunology 7, 235–253.Google Scholar
Behnke, J.M. & Wakelin, D. (1977) Nematospiroides dubius: stimulation of acquired immunity in inbred strains of mice. Journal of Helminthology 51, 167–176.Google Scholar
Behnke, J.M., Hannah, J. & Pritchard, D.I. (1983) Nematospiroides dubius in the mouse: evidence that adult worms depress the expression of homologous immunity. Parasite Immunology 5, 397–408.Google Scholar
Behnke, J.M., Keymer, A.E. & Lewis, J.W. (1991) Heligmosomoides polygyrus or Nematospiroides dubius? Parasitology Today 7, 177–179.Google Scholar
Behnke, J.M., Barnard, C.J. & Wakelin, D. (1992) Understanding chronic nematode infections: evolutionary considerations, current hypotheses and the way forward. International Journal for Parasitology 22, 861–907.Google Scholar
Behnke, J.M., Wahid, F.N., Grencis, R.K., Else, K.J., Ben-Smith, A.W. & Goyal, P.K. (1993) Immunological relationships during primary infection with Heligmosomoides polygyrus (Nematospiroides dubius): downregulation of specific cytokine secretion (IL-9 and IL-10) correlates with poor mastocytosis and chronic survival of adult worms. Parasite Immunology 15, 415–421.Google Scholar
Bryant, V. (1973) The life cycle of Nematospiroides dubius, Baylis, 1926 (Nematoda: Heligmosomidae). Journal of Helminthology 47, 263–268.Google Scholar
Cypess, R.H., Lucia, H.L., Dunsford, H.A. & Enriquez, F.J. (1988) The tissue reactions of mice to infection with Heligmosomoides polygyrus. Journal of Helminthology 62, 69–72.Google Scholar
Dobson, C. & Owen, M.E. (1978) Effect of host sex on passive immunity in mice infected with Nematospiroides dubius. International Journal for Parasitology 8, 359–364.Google Scholar
Enriquez, F.J., Brooks, B.O., Cypess, R.H., David, C.S. & Wassom, D. L. (1988a) Nematospiroides dubius: Two H-2-linked genes influence levels of resistance to infection in mice. Experimental Parasitology 67, 221–226.Google Scholar
Enriquez, F.J., Cypess, R.H. & Wassom, D.L. (1988b) Influence of immunizing dose and presence or absence of adult worms on the development of resistance to Nematospiroides dubius challenge infections of mice. Journal of Parasitology 74, 409–414.Google Scholar
Enriquez, F.J., Zidian, J.L. & Cypess, R.H. (1988c) Nematospiroides dubius: Genetic control of immunity to infections of mice. Experimental Parasitology 67, 12–19.Google Scholar
Grencis, R.K. (1990) Genetically determined variation in host response and susceptibility to pathological damage, pp. 120–145in Behnke, J.M. (Ed.) Parasites: immunity and pathology. The consequences of parasitic infection in mammals. London, Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Jacobson, R.H., Brooks, B.O. & Cypess, R.H. (1982) Immunity to Nematospiroides dubius: parasite stages responsible for and subject to resistance in high responder (LAP L/JAF) mice. Journal of Parasitology 68, 1053–1058.Google Scholar
Jenkins, S.N. & Behnke, J.M. (1977) Impairment of primary expulsion of Trichuris muris in mice concurrently infected with Nematospiroides dubius. Parasitology 75, 71–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lowry, O., Rosenborough, N., Fair, A. & Randall, R. (1951) Protein measurement with Folin-phenol reagent. Journal of Biological Chemistry 193, 265–275.Google Scholar
Meddis, R. (1984) Statistics using ranks. A unified approach. New York, Basil Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
Monroy, E.G. & Enriquez, F.J. (1992) Heligmosomoides polygyrus: a model for chronic gastrointesinal helminthiasis. Parasitology Today 8, 49–54.Google Scholar
Mitchell, G.F. & Prowse, S.J. (1979) Three consequences of infection with Nematospiroides dubius in three inbred strains of mice. Journal of Parasitology 65, 820–822.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D.L., Williams, D.J.L., Behnke, J.M. & Lee, T.D. (1983) The role of IgGl hypergammaglobulinaemia in immunity to the gastrointestinal nematode Nematospiroides dubius. The immunochemical purification, antigen-specificity and in vivo anti-parasite effect of IgGl from immune serum. Immunology 49, 353–365.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D.L., Lawrence, C.E., Appleby, P., Gibb, L.A. & Glover, K. (1994) Immunosuppressive proteins secreted by the gastrointestinal nematode parasite Heligmosomoides polygyrus. International Journal for Parasitology 24, 495–500CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, M., Wahid, F.N., Behnke, J.M. & Gilbert, F.S. (1989) Immunological relationships during primary infection with Heligmosomoides polygyrus (Nematospiroides dubius): dose-dependent expulsion of adult worms. Parasitology 98, 115–124.Google Scholar
Sukhdeo, M.V.K., O'Grady, R.T. & Hsu, S.C. (1984) The site selected by the larvae of Heligmosomoides polygyrus. Journal of Helminthology 58, 19–23.Google Scholar
Wahid, F.N. & Behnke, J.M. (1992) Stimuli for acquired resistance to Heligmosomoides polygyrus from intestinal tissue resident L3 and L4 larvae. International Journal for Parasitology 22, 699–710.Google Scholar
Wahid, F.N. & Behnke, J.M. (1993) Immunological relationships during primary infection with Heligmosomoides polygyrus (Nematospiroides dubius): parasite specific IgGl antibody responses and primary response phenotype. Parasite Immunology 15, 401–413.Google Scholar
Wahid, F.N., Behnke, J.M. & Conway, D.J. (1989a) Factors affecting the efficacy of ivermectin against Heligmosomoides polygyrus (Nematospiroides dubius) in mice. Veterinary Parasitology 32, 325–340.Google Scholar
Wahid, F.N., Robinson, M. & Behnke, J.M. (1989b) Immunological relationships during primary infection with Heligmosomoides polygyrus (Nematospiroides dubius): expulsion of adult worms from fast responder syngeneic and hybrid strains of mice. Parasitology 98, 459–469.Google Scholar
Wakelin, D. & Blackwell, J.M. (1993) Genetic variation in immunity to parasitic infections, pp. 3–22in Warren, K.S. (Ed.) Immunology and molecular biology of parasitic infections. Boston, Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Wassom, D.L. & Kelly, E.A.B. (1990) The role of the histocompatibility complex in resistance to parasite infections. Critical Reviews in Immunology 10, 31–52.Google Scholar