Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:22:32.735Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Immunological Studies on Experimental Infection of Pigs with Ascaris suum Goeze, 1782. VI. The Histopathology of the Liver and Lung*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

L. F. Taffs
L. F. Taffs
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Pathology School of Veterinary Medicine, Cambridge**
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The histopathology of the livers and lungs of pigs after a primary infection with eggs of A. suum was compared with the lesions and cellular response found in resistant pigs after reinfection.

The author's previously published work on experimental infection of guinea pigs, rabbits and pigs is also discussed and summarized.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 42 , Issue 1-2 , August 1968 , pp. 157 - 172
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BOyd, W. C., 1956.—Fundamentals of immunology, Third Edition. Interscience Publishers Inc., New York and London.Google Scholar
Culbertson, J. T., 1941.—Immunity against animal parasites. Columbia, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushing, J. E. and Campbell, D. H., 1957.—Principles of immunology. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc. New York, Toronto, London.Google Scholar
Fallis, A. M., 1948.—“Ascaris lumbricoides infection in guinea pigs with special reference to eosinophilia and resistance”. Can. J. Res., 26, 307–327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoerlein, A. B., 1957.—“The influence of colostrum on antibody response in baby pigs”. J.Immun., 78, 112–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerr, K. B., 1938.—“The cellular response in acquired resistance in guinea pigs to an infection with pig Ascaris”. Ant. J. Hyg., 27, 28–51.Google Scholar
Oldham, J. N. and White, E. G., 1942.—“Chronic focal interstitial hepatitis in the pig: preliminary report on the effect of feeding cmbryonated Ascaris eggs”. Vet. J. 98, 10–17.Google Scholar
Oldham, J. N., AND White, E. G., 1944.—“Chronic focal interstitial hepatitis in the pig: its experimental production by feeding Ascaris eggs”. J. comp. Path. Ther., 54, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, F. H. S., 1934.—“The large roundworm of pigs, Ascaris lumbricoides L., 1758. Its life history in Queensland, economic importance and control”. Bull. Animal Hlth Stn. Yeerongpilly, Australia. No. 1.Google Scholar
Soulsby, E. J. L., 1957.—“Immunization against Ascaris lumbricoides in the guinea pig”. Nature, Lond., 179, 783–784.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soulsby, E. J. L., 1957b.—“Some immunological phenomena in parasitic infections”. Vet. Rec, 69, 1129–1139.Google Scholar
Soulsby, E. J. L., 1958.—Personal communication.Google Scholar
Sprent, J. F. A., 1951,—“On the toxic and allergic manifestations caused by the tissues and fluids of Ascaris. III. Hypersensitivity through infection in the guinea pig”. J. infect. Dis., 88, 168–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sprent, J. F. A., AND Chen, H. H., 1949.—“Immunological studies in mice infected with the larvae of Ascaris lumbricoides. I. Criteria of immunity and immunizing effect of isolated worm tissues”. J. infect. Dis., 84, 111–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stewart, D. F., 1950a.—“Studies on resistance of sheep to infestation with Haemonchus contortus and Trichostrongylus spp. and on the immunological reactions of sheep exposed to infestation. II. The antibody response to infestation with H. contortus”. Aust. J. agric. Res., 1, 301–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, D. F., 1950b.—“Studies on resistance of sheep to infestation with Haemonchus contortus and Trichostrongylus spp. and on the immunological reactions of sheep to infestation. III. The antibody response to infestation with Trichostrongylus spp”. Aust. J. agric. Res., 1, 413–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, D. F., 1950c.—“Studies on resistance of sheep to infestation with Haemonchus contortus and Trichostrongylus spp. and on the immunological reactions of sheep exposed to infestation. IV. The antibody response to natural infestation in grazing sheep and the ‘self-cure’ phenomenon”. Aust. J. agric. Res., 1, 427–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, D. F., 1953.—“Studies on resistance of sheep to infestation with Haemonchus contortus and Trichostrongylus spp. and on the immunological reactions of sheep exposed to infestation. V. The nature of the ‘self-cure’ phenomenon”. Aust. J. agric. Res., 4, 100–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, D. F., 1955.—“‘Self-cure’ in nematode infestations of sheep”. Nature, Lond., 176, 1273–1274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taffs, L. F., 1960.—“Immunization of guineapigs against Ascaris suttm”. J. Helminth., 34, 347–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taffs, L. F., 1961a.—“The in vitro action of immune pig serum on second-and third-stage Ascaris suum larvae”. Parasitology, 51, 327–334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taffs, L. F., 1961b.—“The passive transfer of immunity in guineapigs infected with the nematode A scaris suum. Goeze, 1782”. J.Helminth., 35,315–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taffs, L. F., 1961c.—“Immunological studies on experimental infection of pigs with Ascaris suum Goeze, 1782. I. An introduction with a review of the literature and the demonstration of complement-fixing antibodies in the serum”. J.Helminth., 35, 319–344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taffs, L. F., 1963.—“Immunological studies on experimental infection of pigs with Ascaris suum Goeze, 1782. II. The use of the conglutinating complement absorption test for the demonstration of Ascaris antibody”. J.Helminth., 37, 369–380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taffs, L. F., 1964a.—“Immunological studies on experimental infection of pigs with Ascaris suum Goeze, 1782. III. The antibody response and acquired immunity”. J.Helminth., 38, 129–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taffs, L. F., 1964b.—“Immunological studies on experimental infection of pigs with Ascaris suum Goeze, 1782. IV. The primary antibody response”. J.Helminth., 38, 151–158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taffs, L. F., 1964c.—“Immunological studies on experimental infection of pigs with Ascaris suum Goczc, 1782. V. The antibody response to the oral administration of third-and fourth-stage larvae”. J.Helminth., 38, 159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taffs, L. F., 1964d.—“Immunological studies on experimental infection of guineapigs and rabbits with Ascaris suum Goeze, 1782. I. The minimum lethal dose (M.L.D.) and the minimum immunizing dose (M.I.D.) of Ascaris eggs in guineapigs”. J.Helminth., 38, 303–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taffs, L. F., 1964e.—“Immunological studies on experimental infection of guineapigs and rabbits with Ascaris suum Goeze, 1782. II. Antibody production and the further demonstration of acquired resistance in guineapigs”. J.Helminth., 38, 315–324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taffs, L. F., 1964f.—“Immunological studies on experimental infection of guineapigs and rabbits with Ascaris suum Goeze, 1782. III. The antibody response in rabbits demonstrated by means of the complement fixation and conglutinating complement absorption tests”. J.Helminth., 38, 325–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taffs, L. F., 1965.—“Immunological studies on experimental infection of guineapigs and rabbits with Ascaris suum Goeze, 1782. IV. The histopathology of the liver and lung”. J.Helminth., 39, 297–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, E. G., 1941.—“Chronic focal interstitial hepatitis in the pig”. Vet. J., 97, 155–172.Google Scholar