Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:16:38.967Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of mouse strain, infective dose and larval burden in the brain on activity in Toxocara-infected mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2024

D.M. Cox  and
C.V. Holland
D.M. Cox
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
C.V. Holland*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
*
*Fax: +353 1 677 8094, E-mail: cholland@mail.tcd.ie
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Outbred LACA mice and inbred NIH mice were administered low (100 ova), medium (1000 ova), high (3000 ova) and trickle (4×250 ova) doses of Toxocara canis ova and the effect of infection on activity was examined with respect to: (i) the dose of ova administered and (ii) the number of larvae recovered from the brain. Larval recovery from the brain was significantly reduced in NIH mice compared to LACA mice for the 1000, 3000 and trickle doses. Mice from each strain were divided into larval intensity groupings based upon the number of larvae recovered from their brain. Activity for each mouse was measured pre- and post-infection by observing its behaviour in the home cage. Activity was assessed by monitoring six different independent categories of murine behaviour – ambulation, grooming, rearing, digging, climbing and immobility. Within each behavioural category, the duration of time spent at each behaviour per mouse within one thousandth of a second, the number of short bouts performed and the number of long bouts of behaviour performed were recorded over a 20 min period. Activity of LACA and NIH mice differed prior to infection. LACA mice spent more time immobile compared to NIH mice, which ambulated and climbed more. Variations in activity were also observed between groups of mice prior to infection. The effect of infection differed by strain, by dose and by larval intensity. Post-infection LACA mice became more immobile and ambulated less. NIH mice showed reduced immobility, but while ambulation decreased digging and climbing increased post-infection. Short bouts of activity remained unchanged among LACA mice post-infection but showed an increase for some behaviours in NIH mice.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 75 , Issue 1 , January 2001 , pp. 23 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2001

References

Barnard, C.J. & Behnke, J.M. (1990) Parasitism and host behaviour. London, Taylor and Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burren, C.H. (1971) The distribution of Toxocara canis larvae in the central nervous system of the mouse. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 65, 450–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, D. & Holland, C.V. (1998) The relationship between numbers of larvae recovered from the brain of Toxocara canis infected mice and social behaviour and anxiety in the host. Parasitology 116, 579–594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dolinsky, Z.S., Burright, R.G., Donovick, P.J., Glickman, L.R., Babish, J., Summers, B. & Cypess, R.H. (1981) Behavioural effects of lead and Toxocara canis in mice. Science 213, 1142–1144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunsmore, J.D., Thompson, R.C.A. & Bates, I.A. (1983) The accumulation of Toxocara canis larvae in the brains of mice. International Journal for Parasitology 13, 517–521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Epe, C., Sabel, T., Schnieder, T. & Stoye, M. (1994) The behaviour and pathogenicity of Toxocara canis larvae in mice of different strains. Parasitology Research 80, 691–695.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Festing, M.F.W. & Greenwood, R. (1976) Home-cage wheel activity recording in mice. Laboratory Animals 10, 81–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hay, J. & Aitken, P.P. (1984) Experimental toxocariasis in mice and their effect on behaviour. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 78, 145–155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hay, J., Aitken, P.P. & Arnott, M.A. (1985) The effects of Toxocara canis infection on the spontaneous running activity of mice. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 79, 221–222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hay, J., Kendall, A.T., Aitken, P.P. & Arnott, M.A. (1986) Toxocara canis infection and hyperactivity. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 80, 531–533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holland, C.V. (1997) Epidemiology of toxocariasis in Ireland: human, animal and environmental aspects. pp. 52–64 in Holland, C.V. (Ed.) Modern perspectives on zoonoses. Dublin, Royal Irish Academy.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, W.M., Bradley, M., Cheyne, W.M., Wells, B.W.P. & Hay, J. (1980) Behavioural abnormalities in Toxoplasma-infected mice. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 74, 337–345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, J., Gotelli, N.J. (1990) A phylogenetic perspective on the evolution of altered host behaviours: a critical look at the manipulation hypothesis. pp. 193–229 in Barnard, C.J. & Behnke, J.M. (Eds) Parasitism and host behaviour. London, Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Pritchard, M. & Kruse, G.O.W. (1982) The collection and preservation of animal parasites. 13 pp. Lincoln and London, University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Rau, M.E. (1983) The open field behaviour of mice infected with Trichinella spiralis . Parasitology 86, 311–318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skerrett, H. & Holland, C.V. (1997) Variation in the larval recovery of Toxocara canis from the murine brain: implications for behavioural studies. Journal of Helminthology 71, 253–255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Oortmerssen, G.A. (1971) Biological significance, genetics and evolutionary origin of variability in behaviour within and between inbred strains of mice (Mus musculus): a behaviour genetic study. Behaviour 38, 1–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wimer, R.E. & Fuller, J.L. (1975) Patterns of behaviour. pp. 629–648 in Biology of the laboratory mouse. Dover publications.Google Scholar