Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:55:41.018Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observations and Experiments on Stem Eelworm, Ditylenchus dipsaci (Kühn, 1857) Filipjev, 1936, with Special Reference to Weed Hosts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

J. F. Southey  and
L. N. Staniland
J. F. Southey
Affiliation:
National Agricultural Advisory Service, South West Province, Bristol.
L. N. Staniland
Affiliation:
National Agricultural Advisory Service, South West Province, Bristol.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is well known that certain weeds can act as alternative hosts for some races of stem eelworm, thereby tending to defeat the objects of crop rotation. During the course of advisory work in this province, collections of weeds have been made from various sites where stem eelworm attacks were known to have occurred, with a view to discovering which ones were likely to act as bridging hosts.

While it is fully realised that the presence of D. dipsaci in a weed growing amongst a crop infested with this eelworm does not prove that the eelworms are of the same biologic race, it is felt that observations of this kind are a valuable and necessary preliminary to host transference experiments.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , October 1950 , pp. 145 - 154
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1950

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Fox-Wilson, G., 1943.—“The stem and bulb eelworm, Anguillulina dipsaci, (Kühn, 1858): the importance of collating evidence on the behaviour of biologic strains”. Ann. appl. Biol., 30, 364. (W. L. 1025.)Google Scholar
Fox-Wilson, G., 1948.—“The bulb and stem eelworm in relation, to garden plants”. J. R. hort. Soc., 73, Pt. 10. (W. L. 11230.)Google Scholar
Goodey, T., 1929.—“The Stem Eelworm, Tylenchus dipsaci (Kühn, 1858): observations on its attack on potatoes and mangolds with a host-list of plants parasitized by it”. J. Helminth, 7, 183. (W. L. 112246.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodson, W. E. H., 1926.—“Observations on the biology of Tylenchus dipsaci (Kühn) Bastian, and on the occurrence of biologic strains of the nematode”. Ann. appl. Biol., 13, 219. (W. L. 1025.)Google Scholar
Hodson, W. E. H., 1929.—“The occurrence of Tylenchus dipsaci (Kühn), in wild host plants in South West England”. J. Helminth, 7, 143. (W. L. 11224b.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodson, W. E. H., 1931.—“The stem and bulb eelworm, Tylenchus dipsaci (Kühn) Bastian. A further contribution to our knowledge of the biologic strains of the nematode”. Ann. appl. Biol., 18, 83. (W. L. 1025.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, L. R., 1940.—“On the stem and bulb eelworm (Anguillulina dipsaci), with special reference to its occurrence on weeds of arable land”. Ann. appl. Biol., 27. 248. (W. L. 1025.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staniland, L. N., 1945.—“The occurrence of Anguillulina dipsaci (Kühn), on weed hosts, including new host records in fields of oats affected by ‘tuliproot.’“ Ann. appl. Biol., 32, 171. (W. L. 1025.)Google Scholar