Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:19:38.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The occurrence of Caryophyllaeus laticeps in the nase Chondrostoma nasus from Austrian rivers: possible anthropogenic factors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2008

F. Jirsa ,
R. Konecny  and
C. Frank
F. Jirsa*
Affiliation:
Department of Evolutionary Biology, Emerging Focus Molecular PhylogeneticsUniversity of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090Vienna, Austria Institute of Inorganic ChemistryUniversity of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090Vienna, Austria
R. Konecny
Affiliation:
Department of Freshwater Ecology, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090Vienna, Austria Umweltbundesamt, Spittelauer Lände 5, 1090Vienna, Austria
C. Frank
Affiliation:
Department of Evolutionary Biology, Emerging Focus Molecular PhylogeneticsUniversity of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090Vienna, Austria
*
*Author for correspondence Fax: +43 1 400 60 109 E-mail: franz.jirsa@univie.ac.at
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Between April 2003 and November 2006 a total of 198 nase Chondrostoma nasus (L.) were examined for parasites from seven river sites in Austria. The selected sites showed different levels of anthropogenic alterations in river morphology ranging from pristine areas, with minor anthropogenic alterations, to strongly physically altered rivers. A variety of parasites were recovered from the skin, gills, swimbladder and eyes, with Caryophyllaeus laticeps (Pallas) being identified as the only cestode species occurring in the intestine. This is the first record of this species in nase in Austria. Caryophyllaeus laticeps was confined to the first 20% of the intestine, even in heavily infected hosts. The occurrence of C. laticeps within the fish population seems to be correlated with the degree of anthropogenic changes of the nase's habitat. In rivers with a high degree of ecological integrity or in rivers that are only partially dammed, C. laticeps is either absent in C. nasus or occurs with low prevalence (5.6–20%) and low mean intensity values (1.0–4.0). Where anthropogenic factors have changed the entire river into a reservoir, and fish cannot escape, the prevalence of infection with C. laticeps increases from 46.2 to 78.2% and the mean intensity from 8.8 to 17.2.

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 82 , Issue 1 , March 2008 , pp. 53 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amlacher, E. (1992) Taschenbuch der Fischkrankheiten für Ichthyopathologen, Veterinärmediziner und Biologen. Jena, Gustav Fischer Verlag.Google Scholar
Anderson, R.M. (1974) Population dynamics of the cestode Caryophyllaeus laticeps (Pallas, 1781) in bream (Abramis brama, L.). Journal of Animal Ecology 43, 305–321.Google Scholar
Anderson, R.M. (1976) Seasonal variation in the population dynamics of Caryophyllaeus laticeps. Parasitology 72, 281–305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aydogu, A., Kostadinova, A. & Fernandez, M. (2003) Variations in the distribution of parasites in the common carp, Cyprinus carpio, from Lake Iznik, Turkey: population dynamics related to season and host size. Helminthologia 40, 33–40.Google Scholar
Bush, A.O., Laferty, K.D., Lotz, J.M. & Shostak, A.W. (1997) Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms: Margolis et al. revisited. Journal of Parasitology 83, 575–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bykhovskaya-Pavlovskaya, I.E., Gusev, A.V., Dubinina, M.N., Izyumova, N.A., Smirnova, T.S., Sokolovskaya, I.L., Shtein, G.A., Shulman, S.S. & Epshtein, G.A. (1964) Key to parasites of freshwater fish of the USSR. Jerusalem, Israel Program for Scientific Translation.Google Scholar
Engelhardt, W. (1996) Was lebt in Tümpel, Bach und Weiher? Stuttgart, Franckh-Kosmos Verlag.Google Scholar
Ennskraft, (2007) http://www.ennskraft.at.Google Scholar
Evlanov, I.A. & Kolokolnikova, S.E. (1991) Population ecology of the cestode Caroyphyllaeus laticeps (Cestoda, Caryophyllidae) in the bream population. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 70 (10), 12–16(in Russian).Google Scholar
Gerstmeier, R. & Roming, T. (2003) Die Süßwasserfische Europas. Stuttgart, Frankh-Kosmos Verlag.Google Scholar
Hoole, D., Bucke, D., Burgess, P. & Wellby, I (2001) Diseases of carp and other cyprinid fishes. 264 pp. Oxford, Fishing New Books.Google Scholar
Humpesch, U.W. (1994) Quantitative Erfassung des Makrozoobenthos der Stromsohle in der freien Fließstrecke der österreichschen Donau Bodenstruktur, Besiedlungsdichte und Besiedlungsstruktur. pp. 109–125in Kinzelbach, R. (Ed.) Limnologie aktuell, Biologie der Donau. Stuttgart, Jena, New York, Gustav Fischer Verlag.Google Scholar
Ivlev, V.S. (1961) Experimental ecology of the feeding of fishes. 320 pp. New Haven, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Jirsa, F. (2004) Die proto- und metazoische Parasitenfauna bei Chondrostoma nasus L. und Leuciscus cephalus L. zweier Habitate in Niederösterreich und die physikalisch-chemische Analyse der Gewässer Diplomarbeit, Universität Wien.Google Scholar
Jungwirth, M., Schmutz, S. & Zitek, A. (2001) Fischökologische IST-Bestandsaufnahme an Pielach, Melk und Mank. Wien, Universität für Bodenkultur.Google Scholar
Kanaev, A.I. (1956) On the treatment of carp infected by Caryophyllaeus. Rybnoe Khosaitsvo 4, 50–52(in Russian).Google Scholar
Karanis, P. & Taraschewski, H. (1993) Host–parasite interface of Caryophyllaeus laticeps (Eucestoda: Caryophyllidae) in three species of fish. Journal of Fish Diseases 16, 371–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keckeis, H. (2001) Reproduction and early life history of the rheophilic cyprinid Chondrostoma nasus (L.). Habilitationsschrift, Universität Wien.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C.R. (1968) Population biology of the cestode Caryophyllaeus laticeps (Pallas, 1781) in dace, Leuciscus leuciscus of the River Avon. Parasitology 54, 538–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, C.R. (1969) Seasonal incidence and development of the cestode Caryophyllaeus laticeps (Pallas, 1781) in the River Avon. Journal of Parasitology 59, 783–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, C.R. (1971) The effect of temperature upon establishment and survival of the cestode Caryophyllaeus laticeps in orfe, Leuciscus idus. Parasitology 63, 59–66.Google Scholar
Kerschbaumer, G., Prochinig, U., Gross, T., Hradetzky, R. & Konar, M. (2002) Aquatische Fauna und Flora. in Prochinig, U. (Ed.) Ökosystem Flusskraftwerk Rosegg- St. Jakob, Stand und Zukunftsperspektiven der Bewirtschaftung. Schriftenreihe Forschung im Verbund 79, Wien, Österreichische Elektrizitätswirtschaft Aktiengesellschaft.Google Scholar
Kovacek-Mann, H. (1992) Vergleichende populationsdynamische Untersuchung von Barbe (Barbus barbus, L.1758) und Russnase (Vimba vimba, L. 1758) im Donaustauraum Althenwörth und der angrenzenden Fließstrecke in der Wachau unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Ernährungsökologie. PhD thesis, Universität für Bodenkultur, Wien.Google Scholar
Kulakovskaya, O.P. (1962) Development of Caryophyllaeidae (Cestoda) in an invertebrate host. Zoologicheskic Zhurnal 41, 986–992(in Russian).Google Scholar
Kulakovskaya, O.P. (1964) Life cycles of Caryophyllaeidae (Cestoda) in the conditions of Western Ukraine. Ceskoslovenske Listy Parazitologie 11, 177–185, (in Russian).Google Scholar
Laimgruber, S., Schludermann, C., Konecny, R. & Chovanec, A. (2005) Helminth community of the barbel Barbus barbus from large river systems in Austria. Journal of Helminthology 79, 143–149.Google Scholar
Lang, E. (1993) Gewässerbetreuungskonzept Lafnitz. Wien, Amt der Burgenländischen Landesregierung.Google Scholar
Lawrynowicz, Z. (1968) Intestinal parasites of nase Chondrostoma nasus (Linnaeus 1758) from the Bug and Krzna River. Wiadomosci Parazytologiczne 14, 461–462, (in Polish).Google Scholar
Mackiewicz, J.S. (1972) Caryophyllidae (Cestoidea): a review. Experimental Parasitology 31, 417–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macko, J.K., Ryšavy, B., Špakulova, M. & Kralova, I. (1993) Synopsis of cestodes in Slovakia I. Cestodaria, Cestoidea: Caryophyllidea, Spathebothriidea, Pseudophyllidea, Proteocephalidea. Helminthologia 30, 85–91.Google Scholar
Melcher, A. (1999) Biotische Habitatmodellierung im Rahmen eines Gewässerbetreuungskonzeptes anhand der Lebensraumansprüche der Nase Chondrostoma nasus. Universität für Bodenkultur, Wien.Google Scholar
National Park Donau Auen (2007) http://www.donauauen.at/html/english/index.html.Google Scholar
Pojmanska, T. (1984) An analysis of seasonality of incidence and maturation of some fish parasites, with regard to thermal factor. II. Caryophyllaeus laticeps (Pallas, 1781). Acta Parasitologica Polonica 26, 229–239.Google Scholar
Pojmanska, T. & Choloniewski, J. (1991) The distribution of Caryophyllaeus laticeps (L.) in the alimentary tract of bream (Abramis brama) from Goslawskie lake (Poland). Acta Parasitologica Polonica 36, 39–43.Google Scholar
Reckendorfer, W., Keckeis, H., Tiitu, G., Winkler, G., Zornig, H. & Schiemer, F. (2001) Diet shift in 0+ nase Chondrostoma nasus: size-specific differences and the effect of food availability. Large Rivers 12, 2–4Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl. (135)/2–4, 425–440.Google Scholar
Schäperclaus, W. (1954) Fischkrankheiten. 3th edn.708 pp. Berlin, Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Schäperclaus, W. (1990) Fischkrankheiten. 5th edn.1089 pp. Berlin, Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Schiemer, F. (1988) Gefährdete Cypriniden - Indikator für die ökologische Intaktheit von Flusssystemen. Natur und Landschaft 63, 370–373.Google Scholar
Schiemer, F. & Spindler, T. (1989) Endangered fish species of the Danube River in Austria. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 4, 397–407.Google Scholar
Tabernig, C. (2003) Entwicklung eines GIS-basierenden Fischverbreitungsatlasses österreichischer Fließgewässer anhand der nationalen Datenbank HaFiDat. Diplomarbeit, Universität für Bodenkultur, Wien.Google Scholar
Woschitz, G. (1996) Die Fisch-Fauna der Lafnitz. Naturschutzbrief 169, Landesgruppe Steiermark des sterreichischen Naturschutzbundes, Graz.Google Scholar
Wunder, W. (1939) Das jahreszeitliche Auftreten des Bandwurmes Caryophyllaeus laticeps Pall. im Darm des Karpfen (Cyprinus carpio L.). Parasitology Research 10, 704–713.Google Scholar
Zitek, A., Schmutz, S. & Jungwirth, M. (2004) Fischökologisches Monitoring an den Flüssen Pielach, Melk und Mank im Rahmen des EU-LIFE Projektes ‘Lebensraum Donauhuchen’. St. Pölten, Endbericht, Amt der Niederösterreichischen Landesregierung.Google Scholar
Žitňan, R. (1966) Cestoidea and Trematoidea of fish from the Tisza Lowland. Biologia 21, 763–770(in Czech).Google Scholar