Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:39:57.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Growth and Maturation of Fasciola hepatica L. in the Mouse*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

Ben Dawes
Ben Dawes
Affiliation:
King's College, University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The recovery of nearly 400 specimens of Fasciola hepatica from experimental infections of the mouse, representing 20 stages covering the period from the first day of infection to maturity at 37 days, has made possible for the first time a study of growth and maturation. Flukes have reached the bile duct on the 32nd day of infection, and in two instances reached this final location on the 29th and 24th days.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 36 , Issue 1-2 , March 1962 , pp. 11 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clunies Ross, J. and Mckay, A. C, 1929.—“The bionomics of Fasciola hepatica in New South Wales.…” Bull. Coun. Sci.& Indnstr. Res. Aust., 43, 1–61.Google Scholar
Dawes, Ben, 1961.—“On the early stages of Fasciola hepatica penetrating into the liver of an experimental host, the mouse: a histological picture.” J. Helminth., R. T. Leiper Supplement, 41–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krull, W. H. and Jackson, R. S., 1943.—“Observations on the route of migration of the common liver fluke, Fasciola hepatica, in the definitive host.” J. Wash. Acad. Sci., 33, 79–82.Google Scholar
Lagrange, E. & Gutmann, A.Rivista di Parassitologia, 22, 1961 (06), (93–101) experimentally infected mice with Fasciola hepatica; their findings will be discussed in a later paper which is to appear in this journal.Google Scholar
Lengy, J., 1960.—“A rumen parasite of cattle in Israel.” Bull. Res. Council of Israel, 9B, 71–130.Google Scholar
Montgomerie, R. F., 1928.—“Observations on artificial infestation of sheep with Fasciola hepatica and on a phase in the development of the parasite.” J. Helminth., 6, 167–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumacher, W., 1938.—“Untersuchungen über den Wanderungsweg und die Entwicklung von Fasciola hepatica L. im Endwirt.” Z. Parasitenk., 10, 608–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, J. N., 1932.—“Studies of the liver fluke (Fasciola hepatica)”. J. Amer. Vet. med. Ass., 81 N.S., 34, 76–82.Google Scholar
Shirai, M., 1927.—“The biological observation on the cysts of Fasciola hepatica and the route of migration of young worms in the final host.” Sci. Rep. Inst. infect. Dis. Tokyo Ip. Univ., 6, 511–523.Google Scholar
Sinitsin, D., 1914.—“Neue Tatsachcn üiber die Biologie der Fasciola hepatica.” Zbl. Bakt., 74, 280–285.Google Scholar
Taylor, E. L. and Parfitt, J. W., 1957.“Mouse test for the infectivity of metacercariae with particular reference to mctacercariae in snail faeces”. Trans. Amer. micr. Soc, 76, 327–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urquhart, G. M., 1954.—“The rabbit as host in experimental fascioliasis.” Exp. Parasit., 3, 38–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Urquhart, G. M., 1956.—“The pathology of experimental fascioliasis in the rabbit”, J. Path. Bact.. 71, 301–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed