Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:35:47.422Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ovicidal activity of Paecilomyces lilacinus on Moniezia sp. eggs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2008

F.R. Braga ,
J.V. Araújo ,
J.M. Araujo ,
R.O. Carvalho ,
A.R. Silva ,
A.K. Campos  and
A.O. Tavela
F.R. Braga
Affiliation:
Departamento de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG 36570-000, Brazil
J.V. Araújo*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG 36570-000, Brazil
J.M. Araujo
Affiliation:
Departamento de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG 36570-000, Brazil
R.O. Carvalho
Affiliation:
Departamento de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG 36570-000, Brazil
A.R. Silva
Affiliation:
Departamento de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG 36570-000, Brazil
A.K. Campos
Affiliation:
UNIVIÇOSA, Viçosa, MG 36570-000, Brazil
A.O. Tavela
Affiliation:
Departamento de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG 36570-000, Brazil
*
*Fax: +55 (31) 3899-1464 E-mail: jvictor@ufv.br
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The ovicidal activity of Paecilomyces lilacinus was evaluated on Moniezia sp. eggs. Eggs of Moniezia sp. were incubated on plates with 2% agar-water inoculated with grown fungal isolates and a control treatment without fungus. After 5, 10 and 15 days post-inoculation, the eggs were removed and classified according to the following parameters: effect type 1, lytic effect without morphological damage to eggshells; effect type 2, lytic effect with morphological change in embryos and eggshells; and effect type 3, lytic effect with morphological change in embryos and eggshells, with hyphal penetration and internal colonization of eggs. Paecilomyces lilacinus showed percentages for ovicidal activity (P < 0.01), mainly type 3 effect, of 19, 20 and 23% on eggs of Moniezia sp., after 5, 10 and 15 days post-inoculation, respectively. Therefore P. lilacinus can be considered as a potential biological control agent for this cestode.

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 82 , Issue 3 , September 2008 , pp. 241 - 243
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Araújo, J.V., Santos, M.A. & Ferraz, S. (1995) Efeito ovicida de fungos nematófagos sobre ovos embrionados de Toxocara canis. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia 47, 37–42.Google Scholar
Araújo, J.V., Guimarães, M.P., Campos, A.K., Sá, N.C. & Assis, R.C.L. (2004) Control of bovine gastrointestinal nematode parasites using pellets of the nematode trapping fungus Monacrosporium thaumasium. Ciência Rural 34, 457–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Araújo, J.V., Freitas, B.W., Vieira, T.C. & Campos, A.K. (2006) Avaliação do fungo predador de nematóides Duddingtonia flagrans sobre larvas infectantes de Haemonchus contortus e Strongyloides papillosus de caprinos. Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária 15, 76–79.Google Scholar
Ayres, M., Ayres, J.R.M., Ayres, D.L. & Santos, A.S. (2003) Aplicações estatísticas nas áreas de ciências biológicas. 290 pp. Brasília.Google Scholar
Basualdo, J.A., Ciarmela, M.L., Sarmiento, P.L. & Minvielle, M.C. (2000) Biological activity of Paecilomyces lilacinus genus against Toxocara canis eggs. Parasitology Research 86, 854–859.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beveridge, I. (1994) Family Anoplocephalidae Cholodkovsky. In Khalil, L.F., Jones, A. & Bray, R.A. (Eds) Keys to the cestode parasites of vertebrates. 3rd edn.Wallingford, UK, CAB International.Google Scholar
Carneiro, R.M.D.G. & Cayrol, J.C. (1991) Relationship between inoculum density of the nematophagous fungus Paecilomyces lilacinus and control of Meloidogyne arenaria on tomato. Revista Nematologica 14, 629–634.Google Scholar
Ciarmela, M.L., Basualdo, F. & Basualdo, J.A. (2000) Biological control of Paecilomyces lilacinus genus against Toxocara canis eggs. Parasitology Research 86, 854–859.Google Scholar
Ciarmela, M.L., Lori, M.G. & Basulado, J.A. (2002) Biological interaction between soil fungi and Toxocara canis eggs. Veterinary Parasitology 103, 251–257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ciarmela, M.L., Thevenet, P.S., Alvarez, H.M., Minvielle, M.C. & Basualdo, J.A. (2005) Effect of Paecilomyces lilacinus on the viability of oncospheres of Taenia hydatigena. Veterinary Parasitology 131, 61–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiedler, Z.A. & Sosnowska, D. (2007) Nematophagous fungus Paecilomyces lilacinus (Thom) Samson is also a biological agent for control of greenhouse insects and mite pests. Biological Control 52, 547–558.Google Scholar
Gomes, A.S., Araújo, J.V. & Ribeiro, R.C.F. (1999) Differential in vitro pathogenicity of predatory fungi of the genus Monacrosporium for phytonematodes, free-living nematode and parasitic nematodes of cattle. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research 32, 79–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gronvold, J., Wolstrup, J., Nansen, P., Henriksen, S.A., Larsen, M. & Bresciani, J. (1993) Biological control of nematode parasite in cattle with nematode-trapping fungi: a survey of Danish studies. Veterinary Parasitology 48, 311–325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lysek, H. (1976) Classification of ovicide fungi according to type of ovicidity. Acta University Palackianae Olomue 76, 9–13.Google Scholar
Lysek, H. (1978) A scanning electron microscope study of the effects of ovicidal fungus on the eggs of Ascaris lumbricoides. Parasitology 77, 139–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lysek, H., Fassatiová, O., Pineda, N.C. & Hernández, N.L. (1982) Ovicidal fungi in soils of Cuba. Folia Parasitologica 29, 265–270.Google ScholarPubMed
Mizobutsi, E., Ferraz, S. & Ribeiro, R.C.F. (2000) Avaliação do parasitismo de diversos isolados fúngicos em ovos de Heterodera glycines e Meloidogyne javanica. Nematologia Brasileira 24, 167–172.Google Scholar
Mota, M.A., Campos, A.K. & Araújo, J.V. (2003) Controle biológico de helmintos parasitos de animais: estágio atual e perspectivas futuras. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira 23, 93–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olivares-Bernabeu, C. & López-Llorca, L.V. (2002) Fungal egg-parasites of plant-parasitic nematodes from Spanish soils. Revista Iberoameicana de Micologia 19, 104–110.Google Scholar
Park, J.O., Hargreaves, E.J., McConville, G.R., Stirling, G.R., Ghisalberti, E.L. & Sivasithamparam, K. (2004) Production of leucinostatins and nematicidal activity of Australian isolates of Paecilomyces lilacinus (Thom) Samson. Letters in Applied Microbiology 38, 271–276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santiago, D.C., Homechim, M., Silva, J.F.V., Ribeiro, E.R., Gomes, B.C. & Santoro, P.H. (2006) Seleção de isolados de Paecilomyces lilacinus (Thom.) Samson para controle de Meloidogyne paranaensis em tomateiro. Ciência Rural 36, 1055–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spasskii, A.A. (1951) Essentials of cestodology: anoplocephalate tapeworms of domestic and wild animals. Moscow, Academy of Sciences of the USSR (English translation: Jerusalem, Israel Program for Scientific Translations).Google Scholar
Waller, P.J. (1999) International approaches to the concept of integrated control of nematode parasites of livestock. International Journal for Parasitology 29, 155–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar