Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T02:34:29.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Protostrongylus rufescens: a cytogenetic study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

C. Cutillas
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Sevilla University, Spain
D. C. Guevara
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Sevilla University, Spain
A. Valero
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Granada University, Spain
C. Ariza
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Sevilla University, Spain

Abstract

The diploid chromosome number of Protostrongylus rufescens is 2n=11 for males and 2n=12 for females. So, the sex determinism mechanism is XO/XX. The study of the genetic behaviour of this species has been made. In diakinesis stage the bivalents show typical tetrads with cross, Ø, and lineal configurations. The division of the sexual chromosome is prereductional for the first meiotic division.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cutillas, C., Valero, A., Ariza, C. & Guevara, D.C. (1985) Estudio cariológico de Subulura brumpti López-Neyra 1922–44. Revista Ibérica de Parasitologia, 45, 175176.Google Scholar
Gonzales, J.C. & Malmann, M.C. (1970) Chromosomes of nematodes of sheep and cattle in Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Revista de Medicina Veterinaria de Sao Paulo, 6, 132139.Google Scholar
Jones, G.H. (1978) Giemsa C-banding of rye meiotic chromosomes and the nature of “Terminal” chiasmata. Chromosoma, 66, 4557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klasterska, I. (1976) A new look on the role of the diffuse stage in Problems of Plant and animal meiosis. Hereditas, 82, 193204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nigon, V. & Brunn, J. (1955) Léevolution des structures nucleaires dans Lóovogenéese de Caenorhabditis elegans Maupas 1900. Chromosoma, 7, 129169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Triantaphyllou, A.C. & Hirschmann, H. (1964) Reproduction in Plant soil nematodes. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 2, 5780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triantaphyllou, A.C. & Hirschmann, H. (1966) Gametogenesis and reproduction in wheat nematode, Anguina tritici. Nematologica, 12, 437442.Google Scholar
Valero, A., Pretel, A., Romero, J. & Gonzalez-Castro, J. (1982) Estudio citogenético de Heterakis spumosa Schneider, 1866. Ars Pharmaceutica, 23, 443448.Google Scholar
Walton, A.C. (1959) Some parasites and their chromosomes. The Journal of Parasitology, 45, 120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed