Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:45:03.235Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A simple method for the collection of Necator americanus larvae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

J. Mueller ,
B. Ellenberger ,
A. C. Fusco ,
B. Salafsky  and
A. A. Siddiqui
J. Mueller
Affiliation:
University of Illinois College of Medicine at Rockford, Department of Biomedical Sciences, 1601 Parkview Avenue, Rockford, Illinois 61107, USA
B. Ellenberger
Affiliation:
University of Illinois College of Medicine at Rockford, Department of Biomedical Sciences, 1601 Parkview Avenue, Rockford, Illinois 61107, USA
A. C. Fusco
Affiliation:
University of Illinois College of Medicine at Rockford, Department of Biomedical Sciences, 1601 Parkview Avenue, Rockford, Illinois 61107, USA
B. Salafsky
Affiliation:
University of Illinois College of Medicine at Rockford, Department of Biomedical Sciences, 1601 Parkview Avenue, Rockford, Illinois 61107, USA
A. A. Siddiqui
Affiliation:
University of Illinois College of Medicine at Rockford, Department of Biomedical Sciences, 1601 Parkview Avenue, Rockford, Illinois 61107, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A simple method for the collection of third-stage larvae of Necator americanus has been described. This technique provides repeated recovery of very clean larvae from cultures in moderate numbers.

Keywords

Necator americanuslarvaecollection technique
Type
Research Note
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 63 , Issue 1 , March 1989 , pp. 77 - 78
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beaver, P. C. (1953) Persistence of hookworm larvae in soil. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2, 102–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beaver, P. C., Jung, R. C. & Cupp, E. W. (1984) Clinical Parasitology, Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, pp. 825.Google Scholar
Behnke, J. M., Paul, V. & Rajasekariah, G. R. (1986) The growth and migration of Necator americanus following infection of neonatal hamsters. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 80, 146–169.Google Scholar
Cort, W. W., Ackert, J. E., Augustine, D. L. & Payne, F. K. (1922) Investigations on the control of hookworm disease. II. The description of an apparatus for isolating infective hookworm larvae from soil. The American Journal of Hygiene, 2, 1–16.Google Scholar
Harada, Y. & Mori, O. (1955) A new method for culturing hookworm. Yonago Acta Medicine, 1, 177–179.Google Scholar
Little, M. D. (1966) Comparative morphology of six species of Strongyloides (Nematoda) and redefinition of the genus. Journal of Parasitology, 52, 69–84.Google Scholar
Kwansa, H. A. E. & Murrell, K. D. (1986) In vivo tracking of the migration of Strongyloides ratti in the rat with Selenium-75 labelled third stage larvae. In: Nuclear and Related Techniques in Parasitology. A laboratory manual (editors, Hayunge, E. G. & Stek, M.). International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 225–236.Google Scholar