Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T06:30:41.953Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Spatio-temporal variations in larval digenean assemblages of Heleobia parchappii (Mollusca: Cochliopidae) inhabiting four human-impacted streams

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2020

M. Parietti*
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Parasitología, IIPROSAM – Instituto de Investigaciones en Producción Sanidad y Ambiente, FCEyN, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Juan B. Justo 2550, 7600 Mar del Plata, Argentina
M.J. Merlo
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Parasitología, IIPROSAM – Instituto de Investigaciones en Producción Sanidad y Ambiente, FCEyN, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Juan B. Justo 2550, 7600 Mar del Plata, Argentina
J.A. Etchegoin
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Parasitología, IIPROSAM – Instituto de Investigaciones en Producción Sanidad y Ambiente, FCEyN, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Juan B. Justo 2550, 7600 Mar del Plata, Argentina
*
Author for correspondence: M. Parietti, E-mail: manuelaparietti@hotmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the last years, a growing number of studies have focused on the search for biological indicators of human impact in freshwater environments. Given their susceptibility to different types of impact, larval digeneans have been considered as useful tools for the study of temporal variations in parasite communities. However, few studies have been carried out in lotic environments. For that reason, the spatio-temporal variations of the larval digenean assemblages parasitizing the gastropod Heleobia parchappii were analysed in four human-impacted streams, located on the coast of Argentina. In total, 4800 specimens of H. parchappii were collected seasonally, and 12 digenean species belonging to eight families were registered. Three of the streams showed similar species presence but, during spring and summer, the streams located within the city presented lower species presence than the streams located in the urban periphery. By contrast, the spatial prevalence values evidenced a higher variation between the environments. Streams located in the urban periphery showed higher prevalence values throughout the year, compared to those calculated for streams located within the city. The spatio-temporal variations of larval digenean assemblages parasitizing H. parchappii seem to be mainly influenced by the diversity and vagility of definitive hosts, the types of digenean life cycles and habitat characteristics. However, environmental disturbances derived from anthropogenic activities are highlighted as the probable main factors that may affect the composition and dynamic of these parasite assemblages.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2020

Introduction

Freshwater ecosystems contain about 9.5% of all described animal species and can be considered among the most endangered ecosystems in the world (Dudgeon et al., Reference Dudgeon, Arthington, Gessner, Kawabata, Knowler, Lévêque and Sullivan2006; Balian et al., Reference Balian, Segers, Lévêque and Martens2008). Declines in biodiversity in freshwater environments are far greater than in the most affected terrestrial ecosystems, and streams stand out as biodiversity hotspots (Domisch et al., Reference Domisch, Amatulli and Jetz2015). The settlement of human populations around these environments, with the combination of land use, habitat fragmentation and climate change, contribute to intensifying the vulnerability of animal species inhabiting freshwaters ecosystems (Carpenter et al., Reference Carpenter, Fisher, Grimm and Kitchell1992; Dudgeon et al., Reference Dudgeon, Arthington, Gessner, Kawabata, Knowler, Lévêque and Sullivan2006).

In the last years, a growing number of studies have focused on the search for biological indicators of human impact in aquatic environments. Taking into account that the abundance and virulence of parasites can increase or decrease under the influence of human activity, parasites rank among the most sensitive bioindicators of environmental disturbances (Lafferty, Reference Lafferty1997; Marcogliese & Cone, Reference Marcogliese and Cone1997; Marcogliese & Price, Reference Marcogliese and Price1997; Valtonen et al., Reference Valtonen, Holmes and Koskivaara1997; Huspeni & Lafferty, Reference Huspeni and Lafferty2004; Blanar et al., Reference Blanar, Munkittrick, Houlahan, MacLatchy and Marcogliese2009; Di Giorgio et al., Reference Di Giorgio, Gilardoni, Bagnato, Cremonte and Ituarte2016). Understanding how parasites respond to climate and anthropogenic pressures can provide important information about the stability of the ecosystems (Morley, Reference Morley2007). For that reason, to elucidate how parasite–host systems could change in response to natural or human disturbance, it is necessary to identify temporal patterns in infection dynamics.

Among the parasites, the digeneans (Platyhelminthes: Trematoda) have been used as study models for the investigation of temporal variations in host–parasite systems (Gérard Reference Gérard2001; Yurlova et al., Reference Yurlova, Vodyanitskaya, Serbina, Biserkov, Georgiev and Chipev2006; Herrmann & Sorensen Reference Herrmann and Sorensen2009; Studer & Poulin Reference Studer and Poulin2012; among others). These parasites usually have three-host life cycles, which include free-living infective stages (miracidia and cercariae). These free-living stages of digeneans are exposed to variations of environmental factors (natural or human-induced) that influence their development and mobility, and that can interfere with the contact between hosts, hindering the completion of parasite life cycles (Pietrock & Marcogliese, Reference Pietrock and Marcogliese2003).

Knowledge about the composition and diversity of helminth parasite assemblages in naturally poor in abundance ecosystems is limited, and streams, in particular, are not frequently considered for patterns in biodiversity, probably because of their low species diversity (Hernandez et al., Reference Hernandez, Bunnell and Sukhdeo2007). Argentina has a significant number of streams that cross through populated or rural areas, and are exposed to industrial and domestic effluents, most of them with null or incomplete treatment (Feijoó & Lombardo, Reference Feijoó and Lombardo2007), and are thus very vulnerable ecosystems and different from many streams of the world (Giorgi et al., Reference Giorgi, Feijoó and Tell2005). However, there is little information on the ecological characteristics of these environments (Giorgi et al., Reference Giorgi, Feijoó and Tell2005). The snail Heleobia parchappii (d'Orbigny, 1835) (Gasteropoda: Cochliopidae) is one of the most representative species of the genus in freshwater bodies (streams, rivers and shallow lakes) in Argentina, Uruguay and Brazil (Gaillard & De Castellanos, Reference Gaillard and De Castellanos1976; Castellanos & Landoni, Reference Castellanos and Landoni1995). From a parasitological point of view, this host is very interesting since it serves as host for at least 25 digenean species in Argentina, which make up species-rich digenean assemblages (Merlo, Reference Merlo2013; Merlo et al., Reference Merlo, Parietti and Etchegoin2019). Moreover, the study of Merlo et al. (Reference Merlo, Parietti and Etchegoin2019), carried out in human-impacted shallow lakes, made it possible to identify several factors determining the temporal variations of the digenean assemblages of H. parchappii.

Considering that no attempts have been undertaken to analyse the temporal variation of the larval digenean assemblages of this molluscan host in lotic environments of Argentina, the main achievement of this study was to analyse the spatio-temporal variations of the digenean assemblage of H. parchappii in four streams, located along 65 km of the argentine coast, and to evaluate how local factors can influence these assemblages in lotic environments.

Materials and methods

Study area

The four streams selected for this study are located on the south-eastern coast of Argentina: Tapera stream (TS: 37°56′S, 57°32′W), Corrientes stream (CoS: 38°05′S, 57°33′W), Lobería stream (LS: 38°09′S, 57°38′W) and Carolina stream (CaS: 38°20′S, 57°59′W) (fig. 1). These Pampean streams are characterized by running waters with slow current due to the low slope, high nutrient levels, variable turbidity, riparian vegetation dominated by grassland and by absence of dry periods or extreme temperatures that favour the development of dense and rich macrophyte communities (Giorgi et al., Reference Giorgi, Feijoó and Tell2005; Feijoó & Lombardo, Reference Feijoó and Lombardo2007). They are also heavily impacted by human disturbances mainly derived from agricultural activities and urbanization (Giorgi et al., Reference Giorgi, Feijoó and Tell2005).

Fig. 1. Map showing locations of streams on the Argentinean coast, surrounding Mar del Plata, Argentina.

Sample collections

A total of 4800 specimens of H. parchappii were collected from one sampling trip per season during 2014 in each stream (1200 per season and per stream). Five replicate samples per sampling trip and per stream were taken. Snails were collected from the stream coast along a 120-m transect with the aid of sieves (0.1 mm × 0.1 mm) and placed into plastic containers of 1.5 l capacity for transportation. The physical parameters of each stream were measured at every sampling trip per season: water temperature, depth, width, water velocity and turbidity. The water temperature was measured using a digital multi-thermometer (range −50°C to 150°C), a metric aluminium rod was used to measure the height of the water column and the width of each stream, the water velocity was measured by recording the time taken for a float to travel a known distance along the channel and the turbidity was measured with a Secchi disk. The seasonally relative abundance of H. parchappii was estimated by reference to a standardized search effort (number of snails caught per hour) and conducted by the same person to avoid sampling bias. This method for quantifying relative abundance was adopted due to the turbidity of the streams, which made it impossible to either view the substratum or collect all of the snails in a given area (Martín et al., Reference Martín, Estebenet and Cazzaniga2001; Prepelitchi, Reference Prepelitchi2009).

In the laboratory, molluscs were placed individually in plastic containers until further analysis. The shell length of each H. parchappii was measured to the nearest 0.05 mm using a Leica DM 500 stereomicroscope (Leica S.A., Buenos Aires, Argentina). Randomly selected molluscs were isolated individually and exposed to a 100-watt incandescent lamp for 48 h to stimulate the shedding of cercariae. Finally, all gastropods were dissected under a stereomicroscope and all organs and tissues were examined to detect the presence of sporocysts, rediae, developing cercariae and metacercariae (Curtis & Hubbard, Reference Curtis and Hubbard1990). Emerged cercariae were studied alive, under a light microscope, and were identified according to Szidat (Reference Szidat1956), Yamaguti (Reference Yamaguti1975), Martorelli (Reference Martorelli1986, Reference Martorelli1989, Reference Martorelli1990), Martorelli & Etchegoin (Reference Martorelli and Etchegoin1996), Etchegoin & Martorelli (Reference Etchegoin and Martorelli1998) and Merlo et al. (Reference Merlo, Parietti and Etchegoin2014).

Statistical analyses

To analyse and compare the temporal and spatial dynamics of the community of larval digeneans in H. parchappii in the four streams, two indices were used: seasonal overall prevalence as the number of parasitized snails/the number of collected snails × 100 (Lafferty et al. Reference Lafferty, Sammond and Kuris1994); and prevalence by species as the number of snails parasitized by that species/the number of collected snails × 100.

The differences in community structure between streams were checked with two permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) based on the Bray–Curtis and Jaccard similarity index, using the function adonis from vegan package for R (Anderson, Reference Anderson2001; Oksanen et al., Reference Oksanen, Blanchet and Kindt2019). Since permutational analysis of variance is sensitive to differences in multivariate dispersion between groups (sensu homogeneity of variances), the same models were tested for differences in dispersion using multivariate homogeneity of group dispersions (PERMIDISP) (Anderson et al., Reference Anderson, Ellingsen and McArdle2006). We performed this analysis using the betadisper and permutest function of the vegan package for R (Oksanen et al., Reference Oksanen, Blanchet and Kindt2019). We performed pairwise comparisons after significant interactions of both PERMANOVA (Bray–Curtis and Jaccard) with the pairwise.perm.manova function of the RVAideMemoire package (Herve, Reference Herve2018). Similarity percentages (SIMPER) based on the Bray–Curtis and Jaccard index were calculated between samples to determine which species contributed largely to the average similarity between parasite assemblages in every stream.

To visualize patterns of component community level, ordination was performed by non-metric multidimensional scaling ordination (NMDS) and Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) using the Bray–Curtis index. The NMDS ordinations were obtained using the metaMDS function and the fit of NMDS was quantified by a value of stress (<0.05 provides excellent representation in reduced dimensions, <0.1 is great, <0.2 is good/ok and stress <0.3 provides a poor representation). In the CCA analysis, we started with the full model (including all environmental and biological variables) and then performed a backward elimination of non-significant variables using the step function. Also, to test the correlation between similarity of digenean community and similarity of environmental and biological variables’ matrix distances among sites, the Mantel test was performed. The calculations were performed using the vegan package (Oksanen et al., Reference Oksanen, Blanchet and Kindt2019) in R.

To evaluate the spatio-temporal variation in the parasite prevalence and the possible influence of biotic and abiotic factors, a parametric analysis of variance of two fixed factors with interactions was designed. A lineal model was performed using the following model: prevalence ~ depth + water temperature + turbidity + width + water velocity + mollusc abundance + mollusc size + season × stream. The fixed factors are seasons with four factors (autumn, winter, spring, summer) and streams with four factors (Tapera, Corrientes, Lobería, Carolina). Depth, water temperature, turbidity, width, water velocity and mollusc abundance and size were used as the covariates. The Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD) test was used to test differences among individuals. Analyses were done using the statistical programming language R, version 2.15.2. (R Development Core Team, 2018).

Results

A total of 12 digenean species belonging to eight families were recorded in the four streams in the study (table 1). In Tapera stream, ten species were found, seven species in Corrientes, nine species in Lobería and ten in Carolina. Definitive hosts for these digenean species were detailed in table 1. Most digenean species found in H. parchappii (ten species – 83%) display allogenic life cycles, using mostly birds as definitive hosts. Only Cercaria Haploporidae sp. 1 and Genarchella genarchella had autogenic life cycles and fishes as definitive hosts.

Table 1. Detailed list of species or morphological types of larval digeneans parasitizing Heleobia parchappii in four streams detected in this study.

TS, Tapera stream; CoS, Corrientes stream; LS, Lobería stream; CaS, Carolina stream. Ref.: 1, Etchegoin & Martorelli (Reference Etchegoin and Martorelli1998); 2, Etchegoin (Reference Etchegoin1997); 3, Martorelli & Etchegoin (Reference Martorelli and Etchegoin1996); 4, Ostrowski de Núñez (Reference Ostrowski de Núñez and de Castellanos1992); 5, Martorelli & Etchegoin (Reference Martorelli and Etchegoin1996); 6, Parietti (Reference Parietti2011); 7, Martorelli (Reference Martorelli1986); 8, Merlo (Reference Merlo2013); 9, Szidat (Reference Szidat1957); 10, Szidat (Reference Szidat1956).

The results of PERMANOVA on digenean prevalence data (Bray–Curtis similarity index) showed a strong effect of sites and seasons on the parasite community structure and mollusc size effect (mollusc size: F = 9.75, P(perm) < 0.01; season × stream: F = 3.78, P(perm) < 0.01). Pairwise comparisons showed significant differences in most pairs of samples (all P(perm) < 0.01). However, three compositional groups were identified: (1) Tapera and Corrientes; (2) Lobería; and (3) Carolina. A proportion of these differences can be attributed to differences in the dispersions of parasite communities in the streams (PERMIDISP: F = 20.16, P(perm) < 0.01). According to SIMPER analysis, four digenean species contributed with more than 80% of the similarity between sites: Cercaria Acanthostomidae sp. 1, Psilochasmus oxyurus, Microphallus szidati and Notocotylidae sp. 1.

The results of PERMANOVA on presence/absence data (Jaccard similarity index) showed a strong effect of sites and seasons on the parasite community structure (F = 2.73, P(perm) < 0.01). Pairwise comparisons showed significant differences in all pairs of samples (all P(perm) < 0.01). However, the test indicated two compositional groups: samples from Carolina and Lobería showed greater similarity in species composition compared to samples from Tapera and Corrientes. A proportion of these differences can also be attributed to differences in the dispersions of parasite communities in the streams (PERMIDISP: F = 20.47, P(perm) < 0.01). SIMPER analysis identified Cercaria Acanthostomidae sp. 1 and P. oxyurus as the species that contributed to more than 70% of the similarity between sites.

In the multidimensional ordination of parasite prevalence based on the Bray–Curtis similarity (NMDS), axis 1 and axis 2 explained, respectively, 46.2% and 12.9% of the variance in species composition. Samples from Lobería and Carolina evidenced similar internal variance and similar species composition, and were grouped together in all seasons. Tapera presented higher variance and different species composition with respect to Lobería–Carolina. Finally, Corrientes showed the highest internal variance and the highest variability in species composition throughout the year. The stress level (0.17) indicated a community structure substantially different from random. In the CCA, several variables explained the ordination observed in the NMDS. The first ordination axis was positively associated with the mollusc's abundance, water temperature, width and turbidity, and negatively associated with the mollusc size (P < 0.001, for all cases) (fig. 2). Nevertheless, no correlation was detected in the matrix distances among sites between similarity in species composition and similarity in environmental and biological variables (Mantel test: r = 0.05, P = 0.166). The physical parameters of every stream and the molluscs’ relative abundance and sizes are detailed in table 2.

Fig. 2. Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination plot based on Bray–Curtis similarity on parasite prevalence and Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) in four streams located on the Argentinean coast. Value of stress: 0.17. Abbreviations: TS, Tapera stream; CoS, Corrientes stream; LS, Lobería stream; CaS, Carolina stream.

Table 2. Composition of samples of Heleobia parchappii and environmental variables in the four streams and the four seasons (mean (standard deviation)).

Significant effects of all the variables analysed (physical parameters and host's biotic characteristics) on the prevalence values, and an interaction between sites and seasons (P < 0.001, for all cases) were found. Prevalence values were higher in Carolina and Lobería, compared to Tapera and Corrientes, in all seasons. However, each stream showed seasonal differences in parasite prevalence: Corrientes showed the lowest prevalence values during winter, Tapera during autumn and spring, Lobería during autumn/winter and Carolina during autumn. Finally, the highest prevalences throughout the study were recorded in Carolina (fig. 3 and table 3).

Fig. 3. Seasonal prevalence values for Heleobia parchappii in the four streams. Boxes represent means and vertical bars denote maxim and minimum values. Abbreviations: TS, Tapera stream; CoS, Corrientes stream; LS, Lobería stream; CaS, Carolina stream.

Table 3. Seasonal prevalence values for Heleobia parchappii in the different sampled sites and Tuckey HSD comparisons.

The same letters indicate no differences in prevalence values between seasons within every stream (P > 0.05) and the different symbols indicate differences between streams within every season (P < 0.05); considering that sharing at least one letter or one symbol, depending on the case, indicates the absence of significant differences.

Discussion

The number of digenean species parasitizing H. parchappii was similar in three of the streams studied while, in Corrientes stream, a lower number of species was observed. With respect to stream locations, streams running inside city limits (Tapera and Corrientes) showed a lower number of digenean species, and lower values of species prevalence than streams located in the southern outskirts of Mar del Plata city (Lobería and Carolina). By contrast, the spatial prevalence values evidenced a higher variation between the environments. Streams located in the urban periphery (Lobería and Carolina) showed higher prevalence values throughout the year, compared to those calculated for streams located within the city (Tapera and Corrientes). Concerning seasonal variations, all the streams showed the highest values of prevalence during the spring.

Lotic and lentic ecosystems differ in their local habitat characteristics such as water flow, water residence time, ‘stream hydraulics’, etc. Streams and rivers, in particular, may have differences in water flow and depth along their channels, determining slower and faster-moving sections (pools and riffles). In turn, lentic habitats are more productive with a higher diversity in macroinvertebrates and aquatic plants (Yang, Reference Yang1971, Williams et al., Reference Williams, Whitfield, Biggs, Bray, Fox, Nicolet and Sear2003; Germano & Bury, Reference Germano and Bury2009; Rosset et al., Reference Rosset, Ruhi, Bogan and Datry2017). All these local characteristics can influence the presence and transmission of parasite species in molluscan hosts (Wetzel & Shreve, Reference Wetzel and Shreve2003; Tolley-Jordan & Owen, Reference Tolley-Jordan and Owen2008). In the case of H. parchappii, only 40% of the potential digenean species that can parasitize this mollusc in lentic environments were registered in the coastal streams of the same geographical area. This is probably due to a difference in the composition of host fauna between lotic and lentic environments, and to a combination of biotic and abiotic factors that could determine the absence of some of these digenean species in the streams studied here.

There are a variety of factors that determine diversity at different spatial scales. On a larger scale, animal diversity can be affected by factors such as environmental fragmentation, environmental diversity, urbanization and human impact or the climate (Didham et al., Reference Didham, Ghazoul, Stork and Davis1996; James & Shine, Reference James and Shine2000; Cane, Reference Cane2001; Steffan-Dewenter et al., Reference Steffan-Dewenter, Münzenberg, Bürger, Thies and Tscharntke2002; Dauber et al., Reference Dauber, Hirsch, Simmering, Waldhardt, Otte and Wolters2003; Kruess, Reference Kruess2003; Krauss et al., Reference Krauss, Klein, Steffan-Dewenter and Tscharntke2004; Opdam & Wascher, Reference Opdam and Wascher2004; Zanette et al., Reference Zanette, Martins and Ribeiro2005). On a smaller scale, diversity could be influenced by habitat type, the habitat area and inter- or intra-specific interactions (Ritchie & Olff, Reference Ritchie and Olff1999; James & Shine, Reference James and Shine2000; Veech et al., Reference Veech, Summerville, Crist and Gering2002; Kruess, Reference Kruess2003; Weibull et al., Reference Weibull, Östman and Granqvist2003; Krauss et al., Reference Krauss, Klein, Steffan-Dewenter and Tscharntke2004; Summerville & Crist, Reference Summerville and Crist2004). In the case of parasites with complex life cycles, variables such as distribution and abundance of definitive and intermediate hosts in the environment must also be taken into account (Hechinger & Lafferty, Reference Hechinger and Lafferty2005; Fredensborg et al., Reference Fredensborg, Mouritsen and Poulin2006), together with the dispersive capacity of hosts. In the case of digeneans, definitive hosts with a higher vagility should make a greater contribution to the dispersion of parasites than intermediate hosts. Thus, as the dispersive capacity of hosts grows, the digenean species replacement rate will decrease (Thieltges et al., Reference Thieltges, Ferguson, Jones, Krakau, de Montaudouin, Noble, Relse and Poulin2009; Locke et al., Reference Locke, Levy, Marcogliese, Ackerman and McLaughlin2012). Besides, autogenous parasites (which use fish to complete their life cycles in freshwater environments) have a lower dispersal capacity than allogenic parasites (which use birds, mammals or reptiles to complete their life cycles, usually outside water bodies) (Esch et al., Reference Esch, Kennedy, Bush and Aho1988; Criscione & Blouin, Reference Criscione and Blouin2004; Thieltges et al., Reference Thieltges, Hof, Dehling, Brändle, Brandl and Poulin2011). In the larval digenean assemblages of H. parchappii, most digenean species had allogenic life cycles that can contribute to the species’ dispersal in the area and, consequently, may be responsible for the similarity in species richness recorded between environments.

Many authors have indicated that the first intermediate host can also influence the composition of digenean assemblages through their relative abundances (e.g. Kuris & Lafferty, Reference Kuris, Lafferty and Rohde2005; Rifkin et al., Reference Rifkin, Nunn and Garamszegi2012; Buck & Lutterschmidt, Reference Buck and Lutterschmidt2017). In the case of H. parchappii, it was three times more abundant in coastal streams than in nearby shallow lakes (Merlo, Reference Merlo2013; Merlo et al., Reference Merlo, Parietti and Etchegoin2019). Differences in relative abundances of H. parchappii between lotic and lentic environments could be influenced by the hydrological characteristics of the lotic water bodies. The water currents could transport the molluscs and deposit them in the ‘point bars’, the internal curvatures of the stream, generating high densities in certain points of the bed and low densities in others.

Concerning human impact, the streams studied in this work are located in the most populated province of the country, with 15 million inhabitants representing 47.7% of the total population of Argentina. This province is also characterized by industrial activities (56% of the country's industries are established there) and by intensive agriculture (INDEC, 1994). Precisely, the expansion of intensive agriculture has increased the human impact on lotic and lentic bodies, resulting in elevated nutrients, increased organic and inorganic contaminants and altered biotic assemblages (Walsh et al., Reference Walsh, Waller, Gehling and MacNally2007). Lafferty & Kuris (Reference Lafferty and Kuris1999) mentioned that parasitism may increase or decrease in response to anthropogenic activities like pollution or habitat alterations. Also, several authors had registered greater cercarial release in non-agricultural environments (Lafferty et al., Reference Lafferty, Hechinger, Lorda and Soler2005; Koprivnikar et al., Reference Koprivnikar, Baker and Forbes2007), but others studies have suggested that agricultural areas have, for example, higher trematode infection in larval amphibians because of increased exposure to agrochemicals and eutrophication (Johnson & Chase, Reference Johnson and Chase2004; Rohr et al., Reference Rohr, Schotthoefer, Raffel, Carrick, Halstead, Hoverman and Schoff2008). The area where the streams are located is heavily impacted by recreational activities, especially during summer. In the warmer months, Mar del Plata city receives a great number of visitors (e.g. 1,400,000 tourists only during January 2014) (MGP, 2019). Recreational activities together with the visitor increase could interfere in the contact between birds (definitive hosts) and snails (first intermediate hosts) of the digenean life cycles, affecting the transmission of the infectious stages of the parasite (Lafferty, Reference Lafferty1997; Etchegoin et al., Reference Etchegoin, Merlo and Parietti2012; Parietti et al., Reference Parietti, Merlo and Etchegoin2013). These perturbations, resulting from human activities, could be responsible, at least partly, for the variability in species composition observed within and between streams.

Among the four streams studied, Tapera and Corrientes seem to be the most affected environments, with the lowest values of prevalence in all seasons, and lower species presence in spring and summer. Both streams flow through urban zones located in the northern and southern borders of Mar del Plata city, with permanent human populations that can triple during summer months. As a result of human activities and the absence of official sewage dumps in domestic residences a high concentrations of faecal coliforms were detected in these sites (Isla et al., Reference Isla, Perez Guzzi, Zamora and Folabella1998), and the presence of organochlorine pesticides derived from agricultural practices was also registered in Tapera stream (Miglioranza et al., Reference Miglioranza, de Moreno and Moreno2004). Thus, urbanization and human disturbances, derived from agricultural and recreational activities, could affect the dynamic of digenean assemblages in these coastal environments. In the Tapera stream, Taglioretti et al. (Reference Taglioretti, Rossin and Timi2018) also reported a similar negative effect of land use on the parasite populations and assemblages of the poeciliid fish Cnesterodon decemmaculatus. The other two streams (Lobería and Carolina), located in the urban periphery, might be less impacted by seasonal visitor increase, and by contaminants derived from untreated urban sewage and agricultural practices.

The composition and dynamics of larval digenean assemblages parasitizing H. parchappii in the four streams studied seem to be mainly influenced by a series of factors: diversity and vagility of definitive hosts, types of digenean life cycles, habitat characteristics, molluscan host size and abundance and anthropogenic disturbances. Several studies have already emphasized the influence of these factors on the structure of parasite assemblages at different spatial scales (see Blanar et al., Reference Blanar, Hewitt, Mcmaster, Kirk, Wang, Norwood and Marcogliese2016). However, it should be mentioned that human disturbances derived from urbanization, land use or recreational activities seem to play an important role in the spatio-temporal variations of larval digenean assemblages in streams, as they do in shallow lakes of the area (Merlo et al., Reference Merlo, Parietti and Etchegoin2019). Our results reinforce the idea that parasites can be key indicators to gauge the impact of environmental disturbances on animal communities. Understanding how they respond to these disturbances may contribute to the implementation of measures for the conservation of environments.

Acknowledgement

We gratefully thank two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on the manuscript.

Financial support

This study was supported by grants from FONCYT (J.A.E., PICT number 1819; M.J.M., PICT number 1974) and from Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata (J.A.E., grant number 15/E831 EXA873/18).

Conflicts of interest

None.

Ethical standards

The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of the relevant national and institutional guides on the care and use of laboratory animals.

References

Anderson, MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecology 26, 3246.Google Scholar
Anderson, MJ, Ellingsen, KE and McArdle, BH (2006) Multivariate dispersion as a measure of beta diversity. Ecology Letters 9(6), 683693.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balian, EV, Segers, H, Lévêque, C and Martens, K (2008) The freshwater animal diversity assessment: an overview of the results. Hydrobiologia 595(1), 627637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanar, CA, Munkittrick, KR, Houlahan, J, MacLatchy, DL and Marcogliese, DJ (2009) Pollution and parasitism in aquatic animals: a meta-analysis of effect size. Aquatic Toxicology 93, 1828.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blanar, CA, Hewitt, M, Mcmaster, M, Kirk, J, Wang, Z, Norwood, W and Marcogliese, DJ (2016) Parasite community similarity in Athabasca River trout-perch (Percopsis omiscomaycus) varies with local-scale land use and sediment hydrocarbons, but not distance or linear gradients. Parasitology Research 115, 38533866.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buck, JC and Lutterschmidt, WI (2017) Parasite abundance decreases with host density: evidence of the encounter-dilution effect for a parasite with a complex life cycle. Hydrobiologia 784, 201210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cane, J (2001) Habitat fragmentation and native bees: a premature verdict? Conservation Ecology 5(1), 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, SR, Fisher, SG, Grimm, NB and Kitchell, JF (1992) Global change and freshwater ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 23(1), 119139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castellanos, ZD and Landoni, NA (1995) Mollusca Pelecypoda y Gastropoda. Ecosistemas de aguas continentales 2, 759801.Google Scholar
Criscione, CD and Blouin, MS (2004) Life cycles shape parasite evolution: comparative population genetics of salmon trematodes. Evolution 58(1), 198202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Curtis, LA and Hubbard, KM (1990) Trematode infections in a gastropod host misrepresented by observing shed cercariae. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 143, 146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dauber, J, Hirsch, M, Simmering, D, Waldhardt, R, Otte, A and Wolters, V (2003) Landscape structure as an indicator of biodiversity: matrix effects on species richness. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 98(1), 321329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Didham, RK, Ghazoul, J, Stork, NE and Davis, AJ (1996) Insects in fragmented forests: a functional approach. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 11(6), 255260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Di Giorgio, G, Gilardoni, C, Bagnato, E, Cremonte, F and Ituarte, C (2016) Preference of larval digenean for one of the two sympatric host snails in different stressful habitat from Patagonia, Southwestern Atlantic coast. Journal of Helminthology 91, 696702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domisch, S, Amatulli, G and Jetz, W (2015) Near-global freshwater-specific environmental variables for biodiversity analyses in 1 km resolution. Scientific Data 2, 150073.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dudgeon, D, Arthington, AH, Gessner, MO, Kawabata, ZI, Knowler, DJ, Lévêque, C and Sullivan, CA (2006) Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biological Reviews 81(2), 163182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Esch, GW, Kennedy, CR, Bush, AO and Aho, JM (1988) Patterns in helminth communities in freshwater fish in Great Britain: alternative strategies for colonization. Parasitology 96, 519532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Etchegoin, JA (1997) Sistemas parasitarios presentes en la albufera Mar Chiquita. PhD Thesis, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Argentina.Google Scholar
Etchegoin, JA and Martorelli, SR (1998) Nuevas cercarias en Heleobia conexa (Mollusca: Hydrobiidae) de la albufera Mar Chiquita. Neotropica 44, 4150.Google Scholar
Etchegoin, JA, Merlo, MJ and Parietti, M (2012) The role of the invasive polychaete Ficopomatus enigmaticus (Fauvel, 1923) (Serpulidae) as facilitator of parasite transmission in Mar Chiquita coastal lagoon (Buenos Aires, Argentina). Parasitology 139(11), 15061512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feijoó, CS and Lombardo, RJ (2007) Baseline water quality and macrophyte assemblages in Pampean streams: a regional approach. Water Research 41(7), 13991410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fredensborg, BL, Mouritsen, KN and Poulin, R (2006) Relating bird host distribution and spatial heterogeneity in trematode infections in an intertidal snail—from small to large scale. Marine Biology 149, 275283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaillard, C and De Castellanos, ZA (1976) Mollusca Gasteropoda Hydrobiidae. In Ringuelet RA (ed.) Fauna de Agua Dulce de la República Argentina. Buenos Aires, FECIC 15(2), 540.Google Scholar
Gérard, C (2001) Structure and temporal variation of trematode and gastropod communities in a freshwater ecosystem. Parasite 8, 275287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Germano, DJ and Bury, RB (2009) Variation in body size, growth, and population structure of Actinemys marmorata from lentic and lotic habitats in Southern Oregon. Journal of Herpetology 43, 510520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giorgi, A, Feijoó, C and Tell, G (2005) Primary producers in a Pampean stream: temporal variation and structuring role. Biodiversity & Conservation 14(7), 16991718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hechinger, RF and Lafferty, KD (2005) Host diversity begets parasite diversity: bird final hosts and trematodes in snail intermediate hosts. Proceedings of the Royal Society 272, 10591066.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hernandez, AD, Bunnell, JF and Sukhdeo, MVK (2007) Composition and diversity patterns in metazoan parasite communities and anthropogenic disturbance in stream ecosystems. Parasitology 134(1), 91102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herrmann, KK and Sorensen, RE (2009) Seasonal dynamics of two mortality-related trematodes using an introduced snail. Journal of Parasitology 95, 823828.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herve, M (2018) RVAideMemoire: testing and plotting procedures for biostatistics. R package version 0.9-69. Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=RVAideMemoire. Date of access march, 2020.Google Scholar
Huspeni, TC and Lafferty, KD (2004) Using larval trematodes that parasitize snails to evaluate a saltmarsh restoration project. Ecological Application 14(3), 795804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
INDEC (1994) National Economic Census. Available at https://www.indec.gob.ar/indec/web/Nivel4-Tema-3-8-87. Date of access march, 2020.Google Scholar
Isla, FI, Perez Guzzi, J, Zamora, A and Folabella, A (1998) Aportes de coliformes a la costa de Mar del Plata (Argentina) por vías naturales e inducidas. Thalassas 14, 6370.Google Scholar
James, CD and Shine, R (2000) Why are there so many coexisting species of lizards in Australian deserts? Oecologia 125(1), 127141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, PT and Chase, JM (2004) Parasites in the food web: linking amphibian malformations and aquatic eutrophication. Ecology Letters 7, 521526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koprivnikar, J, Baker, RL and Forbes, MR (2007) Environmental factors influencing community composition of gastropods and their trematode parasites in southern Ontario. Journal of Parasitology 93(5), 992998.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krauss, J, Klein, AM, Steffan-Dewenter, I and Tscharntke, T (2004) Effects of habitat area, isolation, and landscape diversity on plant species richness of calcareous grasslands. Biodiversity and Conservation 13(8), 14271439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruess, A (2003) Effects of landscape structure and habitat type on a plant-herbivore- parasitoid community. Ecography 26(3), 283290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuris, AM and Lafferty, KD (2005) Population and communities ecology of larval trematodes in molluscan first intermediate host. In Rohde, K (ed.) Marine Parasitology. CSIRO Publishing. pp. 321325.Google Scholar
Lafferty, KD (1997) Environmental parasitology: what can parasites tell us about human impacts on the environment? Parasitology Today 13(7), 251255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lafferty, KD and Kuris, AM (1999) How environmental stress affects the impacts of parasites. Limnology & Oceanography 44(3), 925931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafferty, KD, Sammond, DT and Kuris, AM (1994) Analysis of larval trematode communities. Ecology 75(8), 22752285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafferty, KD, Hechinger, RF, Lorda, J and Soler, S (2005) Trematodes associated with mangrove habitat in Puerto Rican salt marshes. Journal of Parasitology 91(3), 697699.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Locke, SA, Levy, MS, Marcogliese, DJ, Ackerman, S and McLaughlin, JD (2012) The decay of parasite community similarity in ring-billed gulls Larus delawarensis and other hosts. Ecography 35(6), 530538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcogliese, DJ and Cone, DK (1997) Food webs: a plea for parasites. Tree 12(8), 320325.Google ScholarPubMed
Marcogliese, DJ and Price, J (1997) The paradox of parasites. Global Biodiversity 7(3), 715.Google Scholar
Martín, PR, Estebenet, AL and Cazzaniga, NJ (2001) Factors affecting the distribution of Pomacea canaliculata (Gastropoda: Ampullariidae) along its southernmost natural limit. Malacologia 43, 1323.Google Scholar
Martorelli, SR (1986) Estudio sistematico y biologico de un digeneo perteneciente a la familia Microphallidae Travassos, 1920. I: Microphallus szidati sp. nov. Parásito intestinal de Rallus sanguinolentus sanguinolentus (Avas: Rallidae) e Himantopus melanurus (Aves: Recurvirrostridae). Revista Iberica de Parasitologia 46(4), 373378.Google Scholar
Martorelli, SR (1989) Estudios parasitológicos en biotopos lénticos de la República Argentina. V. Desarrollo del ciclo biológico monoxeno de la metacercaria progenética de Genarchella genarchella Travassos, 1928 (Digenea, Hemiuridae) parasita de Littoridina parchappei (Mollusca, Hidrobiidae). Revista del Museo de La Plata 14, 109117.Google Scholar
Martorelli, SR (1990) Estudios parasitológicos en la albufera de Mar Chiquita, provincia de Buenos Aires, República Argentina.III: sobre dos cercarias parasitas de Heleobia conexa (Mollusca: Hydrobiidae) pertenecientes a la superfamilia Echinostomatoidea. Neotrópica 36, 512.Google Scholar
Martorelli, SR and Etchegoin, JA (1996) Cercarias de la superfamilia Opisthorchioidae en Heleobia conexa (Mollusca: Hydrobiidae) de la Albufera de Mar Chiquita. Neotrópica 42, 6168.Google Scholar
Merlo, MJ (2013) Ecología de las comunidades de digeneos larvales en hospedadores moluscos del género Heleobia Stimpson, 1865 (Gastropoda: Rissoidea). PhD Thesis, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Argentina.Google Scholar
Merlo, MJ, Parietti, M and Etchegoin, JA (2014) Digeneos larvales de Heleobia parchappii y de Heleobia australis en ambientes dulceacuícolas y estuariales de la provincia de Buenos Aires (Argentina). Revista Argentina de Parasitología 2, 1421.Google Scholar
Merlo, MJ, Parietti, M and Etchegoin, JA (2019) Temporal variations of larval digenean assemblages parasitizing Heleobia parchappii (Mollusca: Cochliopidae) in two shallow lakes from the Buenos Aires province, Argentina. Iheringia. Série Zoologia 109, 1-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MGP (2019) Municipal Tourism Entity. Available at https://www.mardelplata.gob.ar/Contenido/turismo-0. Date of access march, 2020Google Scholar
Miglioranza, KS, de Moreno, JEA and Moreno, VJ (2004) Land-based sources of marine pollution: organochlorine pesticides in stream systems. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 11, 227232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morley, NJ (2007) Anthropogenic effects of reservoir construction on the parasite fauna of aquatic wildlife. EcoHealth 4(4), 374383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oksanen, J, Blanchet, FG, Kindt, R, et al. (2019) vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.3-0. Available at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan/vegan.pdf. Date of access march, 2020.Google Scholar
Opdam, P and Wascher, D (2004) Climate change meets habitat fragmentation: linking landscape and biogeographical scale levels in research and conservation. Biological Conservation 117(3), 285297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrowski de Núñez, M (1992) Trematoda. Familias Strigeidae, Diplostomidae, Clinostomidae, Schistosomatidae, Spirorchiidae y Bucephalidae. In de Castellanos, ZA (ed.) Fauna de agua dulce de la República Argentina. Buenos Aires, Fundación para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. pp. 155.Google Scholar
Parietti, M (2011) Distribución espacial estabilidad temporal de la comunidad de digeneos larvales que parasitan a Heleobia australis (Mollusca: Cochliopidae) en la laguna de Mar Chiquita. Thesis, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Argentina.Google Scholar
Parietti, M, Merlo, MJ and Etchegoin, JA (2013) Can the studies at a spatial scale of 100 s meters detect the spatiotemporal fluctuations of a parasite assemblage? Acta Parasitologia 58(4), 577584.Google Scholar
Pietrock, M and Marcogliese, DJ (2003) Free-living endohelminth stages: at the mercy of environmental conditions. TRENDS in Parasitology 19(7), 293299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prepelitchi, L (2009) Ecoepidemiología de Fasciola hepatica (Trematoda, Digenea) en el norte de la provincia de Corrientes destacando aspectos ecológicos de Lymnaea columella (Pulmonata, Lymnaeidae) y su rol como hospedador intermediario. PhD Thesis, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team (2018) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria, R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at https://www.gbif.org/es/tool/81287/r-a-language-and-environment-for-statistical-computing. Date of access march 2020.Google Scholar
Rifkin, JL, Nunn, CL and Garamszegi, Z (2012) Do animals living in larger groups experience greater parasitism? A meta-analysis. American Naturalist 180, 7082.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ritchie, ME and Olff, H (1999) Spatial scaling laws yield a synthetic theory of biodiversity. Nature 400(6744), 557560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rohr, JR, Schotthoefer, AM, Raffel, TR, Carrick, HJ, Halstead, N, Hoverman, JT and Schoff, PK (2008) Agrochemicals increase trematode infections in a declining amphibian species. Nature 455(7217), 1235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosset, V, Ruhi, A, Bogan, MT and Datry, T (2017) Do lentic and lotic communities respond similarly to drying? Ecosphere 8(7), e01809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steffan-Dewenter, I, Münzenberg, U, Bürger, C, Thies, C and Tscharntke, T (2002) Scale-dependent effects of landscape context on three pollinator guilds. Ecology 83(5), 14211432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Studer, A and Poulin, R (2012) Seasonal dynamics in an intertidal mudflat: the case of a complex trematode life cycle. Marine Ecology Progress Series 455, 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summerville, KS and Crist, TO (2004) Contrasting effects of habitat quantity and quality on moth communities in fragmented landscapes. Ecography 27(1), 312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szidat, L (1956) Uber den entwicklungszyklus mit progenetischen larvenstadien (Cercariaeen) von Genarchella genearchella Travassos, 1928 (Trematoda, Hemiuridae) und die moglichkeit einer hormonalen beeinflussung der parasite durch ihre wirtstiere. Zeitschrift Fur Tropenmedizin Und Parasitologie 7, 132153.Google Scholar
Szidat, L (1957) Über den entwicklungszyklus von Psilochasmus oxyurus (Creplin 1852, Lühe 1910) (Trematoda, Psilostomatidae) in Argentinien. Z. F. Parasitenkunde 18, 2435.Google Scholar
Taglioretti, V, Rossin, MA and Timi, JT (2018) Fish-trematode systems as indicators of anthropogenic disturbance: Effects of urbanization on a small stream. Ecological Indicators 93, 759770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thieltges, DW, Ferguson, MAD, Jones, CS, Krakau, M, de Montaudouin, X, Noble, LR, Relse, K and Poulin, R (2009) Distance decay of similarity among parasite communities of three marine invertebrate hosts. Oecologia 160, 163173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thieltges, DW, Hof, C, Dehling, DM, Brändle, M, Brandl, R and Poulin, R (2011) Host diversity and latitude drive trematode diversity patterns in the European freshwater fauna. Global Ecology and Biogeography 20, 675682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolley-Jordan, LR and Owen, JM (2008) Habitat influences snail community structure and trematode infection levels in a spring-fed River, Texas, USA. Hydrobiologia 600, 2940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valtonen, ET, Holmes, JC and Koskivaara, M (1997) Eutrophication, pollution, and fragmentation: effects on parasite communities in roach (Rutilus rutilus) and perch (Perca fluviatilis) in four lakes in central Finland. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 54, 572585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veech, JA, Summerville, KS, Crist, TO and Gering, JC (2002) The additive partitioning of species diversity: recent revival of an old idea. Oikos 99, 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, CJ, Waller, KA, Gehling, R and MacNally, R (2007) Riverine invertebrate assemblages are degraded more by catchment urbanization than by riparian deforestation. Freshwater Ecology 52, 574587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weibull, AC, Östman, Ö and Granqvist, Å (2003) Species richness in agroecosystems: the effect of landscape, habitat and farm management. Biodiversity and Conservation 12(7), 13351355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wetzel, EJ and Shreve, EW (2003) The influence of habitat on the distribution and abundance of metacercariae of Macravestibulum obtusicaudum (Pronocephalidae) in a small Indiana stream. Journal of Parasitology 89(5), 10881090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, P, Whitfield, M, Biggs, J, Bray, S, Fox, G, Nicolet, P and Sear, D (2003) Comparative biodiversity of rivers, streams, ditches and ponds in an agricultural landscape in Southern England. Biological Conservation 115, 329341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamaguti, S (1975) A synoptical review of life histories of digenetic trematodes of vertebrates: with special reference to the morphology of their larval forms. p. 590. Tokyo, Keigaku Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Yang, CT (1971) Formation of riffles and pools. Water Resources Research 7, 15671574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yurlova, NI, Vodyanitskaya, SN, Serbina, EA, Biserkov, VY, Georgiev, BB and Chipev, NH (2006) Temporal variation in prevalence and abundance of metacercariae in the pulmonate snail Lymnaea stagnalis in Chany Lake, West Siberia, Russia: long-term patterns and environmental covariates. Journal of Parasitology 92, 249259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zanette, LRS, Martins, RP and Ribeiro, SP (2005) Effects of urbanization on Neotropical wasp and bee assemblages in a Brazilian metropolis. Landscape and Urban Planning 71(2), 105121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Map showing locations of streams on the Argentinean coast, surrounding Mar del Plata, Argentina.

Figure 1

Table 1. Detailed list of species or morphological types of larval digeneans parasitizing Heleobia parchappii in four streams detected in this study.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination plot based on Bray–Curtis similarity on parasite prevalence and Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) in four streams located on the Argentinean coast. Value of stress: 0.17. Abbreviations: TS, Tapera stream; CoS, Corrientes stream; LS, Lobería stream; CaS, Carolina stream.

Figure 3

Table 2. Composition of samples of Heleobia parchappii and environmental variables in the four streams and the four seasons (mean (standard deviation)).

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Seasonal prevalence values for Heleobia parchappii in the four streams. Boxes represent means and vertical bars denote maxim and minimum values. Abbreviations: TS, Tapera stream; CoS, Corrientes stream; LS, Lobería stream; CaS, Carolina stream.

Figure 5

Table 3. Seasonal prevalence values for Heleobia parchappii in the different sampled sites and Tuckey HSD comparisons.