Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:28:52.802Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Species of Enterobius Leach, in Primates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

T. W. M. Cameron
T. W. M. Cameron
Affiliation:
Lecturer and Milner Research Fellow in the Department of Helminthology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The vast majority of the helminthic parasites of man are represented among those animals which are in close contact with man, either by the same species or at least, by closely related forms. A very noticeable exception is Enterobius vermicularis. Possibly owing to its special life-history, it has become highly specialised for its human host and to find its closest relations, it is necessary to examine the forms found in primates.

The object of this paper is accordingly to systematise our knowledge of the oxyurid worms found in this group.

As Enterobius vermicularis is the most important of these, it has been found desirable to briefly re-describe its anatomy, followed by that of the related species, in apes, in monkeys and other primates.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , July 1929 , pp. 161 - 182
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1929

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baylis, H. A., 1923.—“Report on a Collection of Parasitic Nematodes, mainly from Egypt Part II, Oxyuroidea,” Parasitology, xv, pp. 15. (W.L. 16035).Google Scholar
Baylis, H. A. 1928.—“Some Further Parasitic Worms from Sarawak,” Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (10th Series) I, pp. 606–608. (W.L. 1050).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gedoelst, L., 1916.—“Notes sur la faune parasitaire du Congo Belge,” Rev. Zool. Africa, v, pp. 24–27. (W.L. 19322).Google Scholar
Maccallum, G. A., 1921.—“Studies in Helminthology,” Zoopathologica, I, pp. 256–257. (W.L. 23839).Google Scholar
V. Linstow, O., 1879.—“Helminthologische Untersuchungen,” Jhft. Ver. Vaterl. Naturk. Württemb., xxxv, p. 330. (W.L. 10870).Google Scholar
V. Linstow, O., 1907.—“Neue und bekannte Nematoden,” Zbl. Bakt., XLIV, p. 265 (W.L. 23684).Google Scholar
V. Thiel, P. H., 1925.—“Deux nematodes nouveaux d'un singe hurleur de Suriname,” Ann. Parasit., III, pp. 171–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Travassos, L., 1925.—“Fauna Brasiliense, Nematodes, Oxyuroidea—Oxyuridæ. Revisao do genero Enterobius Leach, 1853,” Museu Nac. do Rio de Janeiro, n.s., No. II, pp. 5–11.Google Scholar
Vevers, G. M., 1923.—“Some new and little known Helminths from British Guiana,” J. Helm., I, pp. 39–40.Google Scholar