Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T17:29:09.039Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Collective action, opportunism, and class agency under ineffective state enforcement: Marx on English Factory Laws

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2020

Korkut Alp Ertürk*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
*
Corresponding author. Email: erturk@economics.utah.edu

Abstract

The paper focuses on a previously unexamined aspect of Marx's discussion on the 19th century English Factory Acts, and highlights its broader relevance for contemporary discussions about the role of institutions in a market economy. The capitalists' enlightened self-interest was to better husband their work force by limiting the workday and curtailing child labor, but market competition put them in a Prisoner's Dilemma creating an opportunism hazard. The ‘Factory Acts’ addressed the problem, but the state lacked the capacity to enforce them effectively. Marx held that the organized power of workers played an essential role in how the Factory Laws could gain traction at a time when state enforcement was unreliable. Organized labor's threats of sanction were credible enough to lower the expected benefit of non-compliance, enabling capitalists to commit to acting in their long-term, collective self-interest.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Millennium Economics Ltd 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J. (2008), ‘Persistence of Power, Elites, and Institutions’, American Economic Review, 98(1): 267–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J. (2012), Why Nations Fail? The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty, New York: Crown Publishing Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, R. (2009), ‘Engel's Pause: Technical Change, Capital Accumulation, and Inequality in the British Industrial Revolution’, Explorations in Economic History, 46(4): 418435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, T and Hill, P. (2004), The Not So Wild, Wild West: Property Rights on the Frontier, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, G., Ekelund, R. Jr and Tollison, R. D. (1989), ‘Nassau Senior as Economic Consultant: The Factory Acts Reconsidered’, Economica (new series), 56(221): 7181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartrip, P. and Fenn, P. (1983), ‘Regulatory Style in the Nineteenth Century British Factory Inspectorate’, Journal of Law and Society, 10(2): 201222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, M. (2002), The Age of Manufactures, 1700–1820: Industry, Innovation and Work in Britain, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Blaug, M. (1958), ‘The Classical Economists and the Factory Acts – A Re-examination’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 72(2): 211226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaug, M. (1985), Economic Theory in Retrospect, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Booth, D. (1978a), ‘Karl Marx on State Regulation of the Labor Process: The English Factory Acts’, Review of Social Economy, 36(2): 137157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, D. (1978b), ‘Collective Action, Marx's Class Theory and the Union Movement’, Journal of Economic Issues, 12(1): 163185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowles, S. (2004), Microeconomics. Behavior, Institutions and Evolution, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cioffi, J. (2010), Public Law and Private Power. Corporate Governance Reform in the Age of Finance Capitalism, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Clay, K. (1997), ‘Trade without Law: Private-Order Institutions in Mexican California’, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 13(1): 202231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commons, J. and Andrews, J. (1916), Principles of Labor Legislation, New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Cooke-Taylor, R. (1894), The Factory System and the Factory Acts, London: Waterloo and Sons Limited.Google Scholar
Deakin, S. and Morris, G. (1995), Labour Law, London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Deakin, S. and Wilkinson, F. (1991), ‘Labour Law, Social Security and Economic Inequality’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 15(2): 125148.Google Scholar
Deakin, S. and Wilkinson, F. (1994), ‘Rights vs. Efficiency? The Economic Case for Transnational Labour Standards,’ Industrial Law Journal, 23(4): 289310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Soysa, I. and Fjelde, H. (2010), ‘Is the Hidden Hand an Iron Fist? Capitalism and Civil Peace, 1970–2005’, Journal of Peace Research, 47(3): 287298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixit, A. (2004), Lawlessness and Economics. Alternative Modes of Governance, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dixit, A. (2009), ‘Governance Institutions and Economic Activity’, American Economic Review, 99(1): 524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driver, C. (1946), Tory Radical: The Life of Richard Oastler, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ely, R. (1908), ‘Economic Theory and Labor Legislation’, American Economic Association Quarterly (Third Series), 9(1): 124153.Google Scholar
Erturk, K. (2020). ‘Collective Elite Agency and the State’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 16(1): 1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, D. (2020), ‘Social Coordination Problems in Classical and Marxian Political Economy’, Review of Social Economy, 78(1): 434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galbraith, J. K. (1952), American Capitalism-The Concept of Countervailing Power. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Goodwin, R. (1967), ‘A Growth Cycle’, in Feinstein, C. (ed), Socialism, Capitalism and Economic Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.5458.Google Scholar
Greif, A. (1998), ‘Self-Enforcing Political Systems and Economic Growth’, in Bates, R., and Greif, A. (eds), Analytical Narratives, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp.2363.Google Scholar
Greif, A. (2000), ‘The Fundamental Problem of Exchange: A Research Agenda in Historical Institution Analysis’, European Review of Economic History, 4(3): 251284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greif, A. (2006), Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greif, A., Milgrom, P. and Weingast, B. (1994), ‘Coordination, Commitment, and Enforcement: The Case of the Merchant Guild’, Journal of Political Economy, 102(4): 745776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, G., Koczan, A., Lian, W. and Nabar, M. (2018), ‘More slack than meets the eye? Recent wage dynamics in advanced economies’. International Monetary Fund working paper 18/50.Google Scholar
Hutchins, B. L. and Harrison, A. (1903), A History of Factory Legislation, London: P.S. King & Son.Google Scholar
Kahn-Freund, O. (1983), Labour and the Law. (Hamlyn Lecture Series) (3rd edn), London: Stevens and Sons.Google Scholar
Kaldor, N (1961), ‘Capital Accumulation and Economic Growth’, in Lutz, F.A. (ed), The Theory of Capital, London: Macmillan, pp.177222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, B. (2003), ‘John R. Commons and the Wisconsin School on Industrial Relations Strategy and Policy’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 57(1): 330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, P. (1980), ‘Marx on State Regulation: A Comment’, Review of Social Economy, 38(1): 8188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, A. (1972), ‘The Economics and Politics of Consumer Sovereignty’, American Economic Review, 62(1/2): 258266.Google Scholar
Lichbach, M. (1998), The Rebel's Dilemma, USA: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Marvel, H. P. (1977), ‘Factory Regulation: A Reinterpretation of Early English Experience’, The Journal of Law and Economics, 20(2): 379402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, K. (1967[1867]), Capital (Vol. 1), New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Mizruchi, M. (2013), The Fracturing of the American Corporate Elite. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moos, K. (2020), ‘The Political Economy of State Regulation: The Case of the British Factory Acts’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, doi.org/10.1093/cje/beaa034.Google Scholar
Nardinelli, C. (1985), ‘The Successful Prosecution of the Factory Acts: A Suggested Explanation’, Economic History Review New Series, 38(3): 428430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D, J, Wallis and B, Weingast (2009), Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, R. (1984), ‘Some Economics of Labor Law’, University of Chicago Law Review, 51(988): 9881005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosolino, R. (2020). ‘Adam Smith, Workers’ Rights and the Political Side of the Market’, in his: Countervailing Powers. The Political Economy of Market, before and after Adam Smith. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, B. (2011), Capitalism: Its Origins and Evolution as a System of Governance, New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seager, H. (1913), ‘The Theory of the Minimum Wage’, American Labor Legislation Review, 3(10): 8191.Google Scholar
Senior, N. W. (1966 [1837]), ‘Letters on the Factory Act’, in Senior, Nassau W. (ed), Selected Writings in Economics, New York: Augustus M. Kelley, pp.1117.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1985 [1776]), The Wealth of Nations, New York: Random House.Google Scholar
van Bavel, B., Ansink, E. and van Besouw, B. (2017), ‘Understanding the Economics of Limited Access Orders: Incentives, Organizations and the Chronology of Developments’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 13(1): 109131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, J. T. (1962), The Factory Movement: 1830–1855, London: Macmillan and Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, J. T. (1970a), The Factory System. Volume I: Birth and Growth, New York: Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar
Ward, J. T. (1970b), The Factory System. Volume II: The Factory System and Society, New York: Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar