Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:47:16.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coproduction and the crafting of cognitive institutions during the COVID-19 pandemic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2022

Veeshan Rayamajhee Open the ORCID record for Veeshan Rayamajhee [Opens in a new window]  and
Pablo Paniagua
Veeshan Rayamajhee
Affiliation:
Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota, USA
Pablo Paniagua*
Affiliation:
Centre for the Study of Governance and Society, King's College London, London, UK
*
*Corresponding author. Email: pablo.paniagua_prieto@kcl.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In response to Paniagua and Rayamajhee's (2021) proposal for a polycentric approach for pandemic governance, Frolov (2022) notes that their paper focuses on preventive measures, and neglects the deeper, cognitive dimension of coproduction. In this essay, we extend the notion of coproduction to analyze the cognitive institutions that underlie social behavior during a pandemic. We analyze the role of coproduction and polycentricity in the emergence and persistence of shared mental models, including counterproductive models such as virus skepticism, conspiracy theory beliefs, and antivaccine narratives.

Keywords

Cognitive institutionsconspiracy theorycoproductionpandemic governancepolycentricity
Type
Comment
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 18 , Issue 6 , December 2022 , pp. 961 - 967
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Millennium Economics Ltd.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdurasulov, A. (2021), ‘Turkmenistan: Getting Covid in a Land Where No Cases Officially Exist’, BBC News. [Online] Available https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-58583212 [accessed 4 February 2022].Google Scholar
Center for Countering Digital Hate (2021), The Disinformation Dozen: Why Platforms Must act on Twelve Leading Online Anti-Vaxxers, London: Center for Countering Digital Hate.Google Scholar
Chamlee-Wright, E. and Storr, V. H. (2011), ‘Social Capital as Collective Narratives and Post-Disaster Community Recovery’, The Sociological Review, 59(2): 266–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, A. and Brownell, C. A. (2019), ‘The Social Origins of Human Prosociality’, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(3): 274–279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Denzau, A. T. and North, D. C. (1994), ‘Shared Mental Models: Ideologies and Institutions’, Kyklos, 47(1): 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frolov, D. (2022), ‘Crafting of Cognitive Institutions for Overcoming the COVID-19 Pandemic’, Journal of Institutional Economics, published online. doi: 10.1017/S1744137422000030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greif, A. and Mokyr, J. (2017), ‘Cognitive Rules, Institutions, and Economic Growth: Douglass North and Beyond’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 13(1): 25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, J. (1997), ‘Social Institutions and Human Cognition: Thinking About Old Questions in New Ways’, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE)/Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 153(4): 693–699.Google Scholar
Koppl, R. (2002), Big Players and the Economic Theory of Expectations, London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mokyr, J. (2016), A Culture of Growth, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molleman, L., Quiñones, A. E. and Weissing, F. J. (2013), ‘Cultural Evolution of Cooperation: The Interplay Between Forms of Social Learning and Group Selection’, Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(5): 342–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1990), Governing the Commons, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1992), Crafting Institutions for Self-Governing Irrigation Systems, California: Institute for Contemporary Studies.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2000), ‘Crowding out Citizenship’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 23(1): 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2012), ‘Nested Externalities and Polycentric Institutions: Must We Wait for Global Solutions to Climate Change Before Taking Actions at Other Scales?’, Economic Theory, 49(2): 353–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paniagua, P. (2020), ‘Governing the (Banking) Commons: Polycentric Solutions to Bank Runs’, in Boettke, P., Herzberg, R., and Kogelmann, B. (eds), Exploring the Political Economy and Social Philosophy of Vincent and Elinor Ostrom, London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, pp. 115–144.Google Scholar
Paniagua, P. and Rayamajhee, V. (2021), ‘A Polycentric Approach for Pandemic Governance: Nested Externalities and Co-Production Challenges’, Journal of Institutional Economics, published online. doi: 10.1017/S1744137421000795Google Scholar
Parks, R. B., Baker, P. C., Kiser, L., Oakerson, R., Ostrom, E., Ostrom, V., Percy, S. L., Vandivort, M. B., Whitaker, G. P. and Wilson, R. (1981), ‘Consumers as Coproducers of Public Services: Some Economic and Institutional Considerations’, Policy Studies Journal, 9(7): 1001–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rayamajhee, V. and Bohara, A. K. (2021), ‘Social Capital, Trust, and Collective Action in Post-Earthquake Nepal’, Natural Hazards, 105(1): 1491–1519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rayamajhee, V., Shrestha, S. and Paniagua, P. (2021), ‘Governing Nested Externalities During a Pandemic: Social Distancing as a Coproduction Problem’, Cosmos + Taxis, 9(5–6): 64–80.Google Scholar
Rayamajhee, V., Storr, V. H. and Bohara, A. K. (2022), ‘Social Entrepreneurship, Co-Production, and Post-Disaster Recovery’, Disasters, 46(1): 27–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Storr, V. H., Haeffele, S., Grube, L. E. and Lofthouse, J. K. (2021), ‘Crisis as a Source of Social Capital: Adaptation and Formation of Social Capital During the COVID-19 Pandemic’, Cosmos + Taxis, 9(5–6): 94–108.Google Scholar
Timberg, C. and Dwoskin, E. (2021), ‘With Trump Gone, QAnon Groups Focus Fury on Attacking Coronavirus Vaccines’, Washington Post. [Online] Available https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/03/11/with-trump-gone-qanon-groups-focus-fury-attacking-covid-vaccines/ [accessed 4 February 2022].Google Scholar
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D. and Aral, S. (2018), ‘The Spread of True and False News Online’, Science, 359(6380): 1146–1151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed