Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T05:16:44.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Expert-influence in adapting flood governance: An institutional analysis of the spatial turns in the United States and the Netherlands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2017

EMMY BERGSMA
EMMY BERGSMA*
Affiliation:
KWR Watercycle Research Institute, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
*
*Email: emmy.bergsma@kwrwater.nl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In response to climate change, many national governments are shifting their focus from ‘safety’ to ‘spatial-planning’ measures in flood governance. Rather than providing full protection against floods, spatial-planning measures aim to reduce the impacts of floods by encouraging damage mitigation in local-level spatial-planning and building choices. This turn to spatial-planning measures has important implications for how costs and responsibilities are divided in flood governance. This paper examines the role of experts in shaping the distributive aspects of this shift. Using a theoretical framework on institutional change, the role of experts is analyzed in two case studies. The first focuses on the United States, where a turn to spatial-planning measures was made in the 1960s. The second case study looks at this turn Dutch flood governance, which has always been characterized by a strong safety paradigm. The paper draws conclusions about the effects of expert-influence on distributive decision-making underlying institutional changes in both cases.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 14 , Special Issue 3: Special Issue on Adapting Institutions to Climate Change , June 2018 , pp. 449 - 471
Copyright
Copyright © Millennium Economics Ltd 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aerts, J. and Botzen, W. (2011), ‘Climate Change Impacts on Pricing Long-Term flood Insurance: A Comprehensive Study for the Netherlands’, Global Environmental Change, 21 (3): 1045–1060.Google Scholar
Arnell, N. (1984), ‘Flood Hazard Management in the United States and the National Flood Insurance Program’, Geoforum, 15 (4): 525–542.Google Scholar
Arnold, J. (1988), The Evolution of the 1936 Flood Control Act, Virginia: Office of History of the Unites States Army Corps of Engineers.Google Scholar
Arts, B., Leroy, P. and Van Tatenhove, J. (2006), ‘Political Modernisation and Policy Arrangements: A Framework for Understanding Environmental Policy Change’, Public Organization Review, 6 (2): 93–106.Google Scholar
Arts, B. and Van Tatenhove, J. (2004), ‘Policy and Power: A Conceptual Framework Between the ‘Old’ and ‘New’ Policy Idioms’, Policy Sciences, 37 (3): 339–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baneke, D. (2011), ‘Synthetic Technocracy: Dutch Scientific Intellectuals in Science, Society and Culture, 1880-1950’, British Journal for the History of Science, 44 (160): 89–113.Google Scholar
Barry, J. (1997), Rising Tide: The Great Mississippi Flood of 1927 and How it Changed America, New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Beck, U. (1992), Risk Society – Towards a New Modernity, London: SAGE publications.Google Scholar
Bergsma, E., Gupta, J. and Jong, P. (2012), ‘Does Individual Responsibility Increase the Adaptive Capacity of Society? The Case of Local Water Management in the Netherlands’, Journal of Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 64 (July): 13–22.Google Scholar
Birkland, T. A. (1997), After Disaster: Agenda Setting, Public Policy and Focusing Events, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Bolognesi, T. (2015), ‘The Water Vulnerability of Metro and Megacities: An Investigation of Structural Determinants’, Natural Resources Forum, 39 (2): 123–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botzen, W.J.W. and van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. (2008), ‘Insurance Against Climate Change and flooding in the Netherlands: Present, Future, and Comparison with Other Countries’, Risk Analysis, 28 (2): 413–426.Google Scholar
Brousseau, E., Garrouste, P. and Raynaud, E. (2011), ‘Institutional Changes: Alternative Theories and Consequences for Institutional Design’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 79 (1–2): 3–19.Google Scholar
Bubeck, P., Botzen, W. and Aerts, J. (2012), ‘A Review of Risk Perceptions and Other Factors that Influence Flood Mitigation Behavior’, Risk Analysis, 32 (9): 1481–1495.Google Scholar
Butler, C. and Pidgeon, N. (2011), ‘From “flood defence” to “flood risk management”: exploring governance, responsibility, and blame’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 29 (3): 533–547.Google Scholar
Clemens, E. and Cook, J. (1999), ‘Politics and Institutionalism: Explaining Durability and Change’, Annual Review of Sociology, 25: 441–466.Google Scholar
Committee on Appropriations (1981), Hearings before a subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations of the United States Senate, Special Hearing, held on May 6, 1981, Report no. 79-922, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Corry, O. (2012), ‘Securitisation and ‘Riskification: Second-order Security and the Politics of Climate Change’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 40 (2): 235–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Moel, H., Van Vliet, M. and Aerts, J. (2014), ‘Evaluating the Effect of Flood Damage-Reducing Measures: A Case Study of the Unembanked area of Rotterdam, the Netherlands’, Regional Environmental Change, 14 (3): 895–908.Google Scholar
Delta Program (2014), Synthesedocument Ruimtelijke Adaptatie Achtergronddocument B3, [Online], Available: http://www.deltacommissaris.nl/deltaprogramma/documenten/publicaties/2014/09/16/deltaprogramma-2015-achtergronddocument-b3 [15 Sept 2015].Google Scholar
Den Hoed, P. and Keizer, A. (2007), Op Steenworp Afstand - Op De Brug Tussen Wetenschap En Politiek, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Eijgenraam, C., Kind, J., Bak, C., Brekelmans, R., Den Hertog, D., Duits, M., Roos, K., Vermeer, P. and Kuijken, W. (2014), ‘Economically Efficient Standards to Protect the Netherlands Against Flooding’, Interfaces, 44 (1): 7–21.Google Scholar
Ewald, F. (1991), ‘Insurance and Risk’, in Burchell, G., Gordon, C. and Miller, P. (eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, pp. 197–210.Google Scholar
Fuenfschilling, L. and Truffer, B. (2014), ‘The Structuration of Socio-Technical Regimes – Conceptual Foundations from Institutional Theory’, Research Policy, 43 (4): 772–791.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1984), The Constitution of Society, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gray, B., Purdy, J. and Ansari, J. (2015), ‘From Interactions to Institutions: Microprocesses of Framing and Mechanisms for the Structuring of Institutional Fields’, Academy of Management Review, 40 (1): 115–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. (1996), translated by Regh, W., Between Facts and Norms - Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, Cambridge, MA: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Hajer, M. (1995), The Politics of Environmental Discourse – Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hajer, M. and Laws, D. (2008), ‘Ordering Through Discourse’, in Goodin, R. E., Moran, M. and Rein, M. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 251–268.Google Scholar
Hall, P. and Taylor, R. (1996), ‘Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms’, Political Studies, XLIV, 936–957.Google Scholar
Hartmann, T. (2009), ‘Clumsy Floodplains and the Law: Towards a Responsive Land Policy for Extreme Floods’, Built Environment, 35 (4): 531–544.Google Scholar
Hegger, D., Driessen, P., Dieperink, C., Wiering, M., Raadgever, G. and Van Rijkswick, H. (2014), ‘Assessing Stability and Dynamics in Flood Risk Governance: An Emperically Grounded Research Approach’, Water Resources Management, 28 (12): 4127–4142.Google Scholar
Hirst, P. (2002), ‘Renewing Democracy through Associations’, The Political Quarterly, 73 (4): 409–421.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2007), ‘Institutions and Individuals: Interaction and Evolution’, Organizational Studies, 28 (1): 95–116.Google Scholar
HUD (1966), Insurance and Other Programs for Financial Assistance to Flood Victims, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S. (ed.) (2004), States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jong, P. and Van den Brink, M. (2013), ‘Between Tradition and Innovation: Developing Flood Risk Management Plans in the Netherlands’, Journal of Flood Risk Management, DOI: 10.1111/jfr3.12070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamerstukken II (1994/1995), 24071, nr. 8, Sdu Uitgevers: Den Haag.Google Scholar
Kamerstukken II (1995/1996), 24640, nr. 1, Sdu Uitgevers: Den Haag.Google Scholar
Kamerstukken II (1996/1997a), 18106, nr. 81, Sdu Uitgevers: Den Haag.Google Scholar
Kamerstukken II (1996/1997b), 25159, nr. 5, Sdu Uitgevers: Den Haag.Google Scholar
Kamerstukken II (2005/2006), 30462, nr. 4, Sdu Uitgevers: Den Haag.Google Scholar
Kamerstukken II (2010/2011), 31710, nr. 20, Sdu Uitgevers: Den Haag.Google Scholar
Kamerstukken II (2013/2014), 27625, nr. 328, Sdu Uitgevers: Den Haag.Google Scholar
Kamerstukken II (2015/2016), 34300-J, nr. 6, Sdu Uitgevers: Den Haag.Google Scholar
Kingdon, J. (1995), Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies, New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Kingston, C. and Caballero, G. (2009), ‘Comparing Theories of Institutional Change’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 5 (2): 151–180.Google Scholar
Kok, M., Van Vliet, L. and Klijn, F. (2014), Deltafact - Verzekeren Van Overstromingsschade, Delft: HKV lijn in water/Deltares.Google Scholar
Kuks, S. M. M. (2004), Water Governance and Institutional Change, PhD, University of Twente.Google Scholar
Kunreuther, H. (2006), ‘Disaster Mitigation and Insurance: Learning from Katrina’, Annals, 604 (1): 208–227.Google Scholar
Lange, H. and Garrelts, H. (2007), ‘Risk Management at the Science–Policy Interface: Two Contrasting Cases in the Field of Flood Protection in Germany’, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 9 (3-4): 263–279.Google Scholar
Lintsen, H. (1980), Ingenieurs in Nederland in de Negentiende Eeuw – Een Streven naar Erkenning en Macht, ’s-Gravenhage: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Lowndes, V. (2010), ‘The Institutional Approach’, in March, D. and Stoker, G. (eds.), Theory and Methods in Political Science (third edition). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 60–79.Google Scholar
Mahoney, J. and Thelen, K. (2010), ‘A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change’, in Mahoney, J. and Thelen, K. (eds.), Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency and Power, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–37.Google Scholar
Majone, G. (1999), ‘The Regulatory State and its Legitimacy Problems’, West European Politics, 22 (1): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J. and Olsen, J. (1989), Rediscovering Institutions, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Meijerink, S. and Dicke, W. (2008), ‘Shifts in the Public-Private Divide in Flood Management’, Water Resources Development, 24 (4): 499–512.Google Scholar
Michel-Kerjan, E. (2010), ‘Catastrophe Economics: The National Flood Insurance Program’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24 (4): 165–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michel-Kerjan, E., Lemoyne de Forges, S. and Kunreuther, H. (2012), ‘Policy Tenure Under the US National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)’, Risk Analysis, 32 (4): 644–658.Google Scholar
New York Times (2013), Cost of Flood Insurance Rises, Along With Worries. New York Times, online article, 12 October 2013, [Online], Available: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/13/us/cost-of-flood-insurance-rises-along-with-worries.html?_r=0 [11 Feb 2016].Google Scholar
North, D. C. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pasterick, E. (2000), ‘The National Flood Insurance Program: A US Approach to Flood Loss Reduction’, in Marsalek, J., Watt, W., Zeman, E. and Sieker, F. (eds.), Flood Issues in Contemporary Water Management, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 185–196.Google Scholar
Paudel, Y., Botzen, W., Aerts, J. and Dijkstra, T. (2015), ‘Risk Allocation in a Public-Private Catastrophe Insurance System: An Actuarial Analysis of Deductibles, Stop-Loss, and Premiums’, Journal of Flood Risk Management, 8 (2): 116–134.Google Scholar
Penning-Rowsell, E. C. and Pardoe, J. (2012), ‘Who Benefits and Who Loses from Flood Risk Reduction?’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30 (3): 448–466.Google Scholar
Platt, R. (1986), ‘Flood and Man: A Geographer's Agenda’, in Kates, R. and Burton, I. (eds.), Geography, Resources, and Environment: Themes from the Work of Gilbert F. White, Vol. II, Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press, pp. 28–68.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1999), A Theory of Justice, Revised edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuss, M. (1992), ‘Coping With Uncertainty: Social Scientists, Engineers, and Federal Water Resources Planning’, Journal of Natural Resources, 32 (1): 101–135.Google Scholar
Riebau, M. (2000), ‘The Importance of Maps for Floodplain Management and Flood Insurance’, in Marsalek, J., Watt, W., Zeman, E. and Sieker, F. (eds.), Flood Issues in Contemporary Water Management, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 167–173.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, P. (2008), Counter-Democracy – Politics in an Age of Distrust, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Seawright, J. and Gerring, J. (2008), ‘Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options’, Political Research Quarterly, 61 (2): 294–308.Google Scholar
Spruijt, P., Knol, A., Vasileiadou, E., Devilee, J., Lebret, E. et al. (2014), ‘Roles of Scientists As Policy Advisers on Complex Issues: A Literature Review’, Environmental Science & Policy, 40: 16–25.Google Scholar
Stb (1958), Delta Act of May 8 1958, section 5 on rules regarding compensation.Google Scholar
Subcommittee on Economic Policy (2013), Hearing before the Subcommittee on Economic Policy of the Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs of the U.S. Senate held on September 18, 2013, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, [Online], Available: http://www.banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&Hearing_ID=46b52a52-4d45-4c47-8ddc-de2f32cd348e [4 Jan 2015].Google Scholar
Subcommittee on Housing And Community Opportunity (2010), Hearing before the Subcommittee on Housing and Community Opportunity of the Committee on Financial Services of the U.S. House of Representatives held on April 21, 2010, Report no. 111-126, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Subcommittee on Housing and Urban Affairs (1973), Hearings before the Sub-Committee on Housing and Urban Affairs of the Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs of the US Senate held on June 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15, 1973, Report no. 98-860, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Swiss, R. (2012), Flood – An Underestimated Risk: Inspect, Inform, Insure, Zurich: Swiss Reinsurance Company Ltd.Google Scholar
UNISDR (2015), Disasters in Numbers, United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction: Geneva, [Online], Available: http://www.unisdr.org/files/47804_2015disastertrendsinfographic.pdf [2 Feb 2016].Google Scholar
US Water Resources Council (1971), Regulation of Flood Hazard Areas to Reduce Flood Losses, Volume 1, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Van der Houven van Oordt, H. and Vissering, G. (1901), De Economische Beteekenis Van De Afsluiting En Drooglegging der Zuiderzee, Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
Van Tatenhove, J., Arts, B. and Leroy, P. (eds.) (2000), Political Modernization and the Environment: The Renewal of Environmental Policy Arrangements, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VenW, and VROM, (2006), Beleidslijn Grote Rivieren, [Online], Available: https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/kamerstukken/2006/07/26/beleidslijn-grote-rivieren [4 Feb 2016].Google Scholar
Vink, M., Boezeman, D., Dewulf, A. and Termeer, C. (2013), ‘Changing Climate, Changing Frames. Dutch Water Policy Frame Developments in the Context of a Rise and Fall of Attention to Climate Change’, Environmental Science & Policy, 30 (June): 90–101.Google Scholar
Von Lucke, F., Wellmann, A. and Diez, T. (2014), ‘What's at Stake in Securitizing Climate Change? Towards a Differentiated Approach’, Geopolitics, 19 (4): 857–884.Google Scholar
Warren, M. E. (2006), ‘Deliberative Democracy and Authority’, The American Political Science Review, 90 (1): 46–60.Google Scholar
WB21 (2000), Water Beleid Voor De 21e Eeuw - Geef Water de Ruimte en de Aandacht Die Het Verdient, Den Haag: Commissie Waterbeheer 21e eeuw.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1978), translated and edited by Roth, G. and Wittich, C. (eds), Economy and Society, Berkely/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wetherell, M. and Potter, J. (1988), ‘Discourse Analysis and the Identification of Interpretative Repertoires’, in , C. Antaki, (ed.), Analysing Everyday Explanation: A Case-Book of Methods, London: Age, pp. 168–183.Google Scholar
White, G. (1945), Human Adjustment to Floods, PhD, The University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Wolsink, M. (2006), ‘River Basin Approach and Integrated Water Management: Governance Pitfalls for the Dutch Space-Water-Adjustment Management Principle’, Geoforum, 37 (4): 473–587.Google Scholar
Woltjer, J. and Al, N. (2007), ‘Integrating Water Management and Spatial Planning’, Journal of the American Planning Association, 73 (2): 211–222.Google Scholar
Yin, R. (2009), Doing Case Study Research, 4th edition, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Zuiderzeevereniging (1892), Resultaten van Technisch Onderzoek 1886-1892, Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
Zuiderzeevereniging (1905), Verzameling Rapporten Uitgegeven Door de Zuiderzeevereniging, Deel I – De Zuiderzeevisscherij. Rapport Eener Commissie Tot Onderzoek, Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
Zuiderzeevereniging (1916), De Watervloed van 13-14 Januari 1916, Leiden: Boekhandel en Drukkerij, voorheen E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
90 Congressional Records H17277-H17280 (daily edition June 26, 1967).Google Scholar
156(105) Congressional Records H5621-H5658 (daily edition July 15, 2010).Google Scholar
158(100) Congressional Records H4610-H4636 (daily edition June 29, 2012).Google Scholar