Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:25:45.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How does relationship-based governance accommodate new entrants? Evidence from the cycle-rickshaw rental market

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 December 2016

TARUN JAIN Open the ORCID record for TARUN JAIN [Opens in a new window]  and
ASHIMA SOOD
TARUN JAIN*
Affiliation:
Economics and Public Policy Area, Indian School of Business, Hyderabad, India
ASHIMA SOOD*
Affiliation:
Centre for Management Studies, NALSAR University of Law, Hyderabad, India
*
*Email: tj9d@virginia.edu
**Email: asjsood@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Relationship-based contract enforcement is commonly thought to limit market expansion. In contrast, this paper illustrates how relationship-based contract governance accommodates new entrants into market exchange using a case study of the cycle-rickshaw rental market in a city in central India. Migrants face a higher penalty for default that introduces a gap between the ex ante risk for out-of-network agents and the ex post risk. As a result, cycle-rickshaw owners are more likely to rent to migrants and migrants are more likely to participate in rental contracts. With primary data on multidimensional measures of migrant status, we confirm that migrant status is a significant predictor of rental contract participation, even controlling for other variables that moderate the rickshaw driver's ability to own a cycle-rickshaw. Our findings thus introduce a new perspective into current understandings of relationship-based contract governance.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , September 2017 , pp. 673 - 697
Copyright
Copyright © Millennium Economics Ltd 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aleem, I. (1990), ‘Imperfect Information, Screening, and the Costs of Informal Lending: A Study of a Rural Credit Market in Pakistan’, The World Bank Economic Review, 4(3): 329–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, F. (1983), ‘Credit Rationing and Payment Incentives’, Review of Economic Studies, 50(4): 639–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, B. (1983), ‘Social Networks in the Migration Process: Empirical Evidence on Chain Migration in Contemporary India’, Journal of Developing Areas, 17(2): 185–196.Google Scholar
Basu, K. (1997), Analytical Development Economics: The Less Developed Economy Revisited, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Basu, K. and Bell, C. (1991), ‘Fragmented Duopoly: Theory and Applications to Backward Agriculture’, Journal of Development Economics, 36(2): 145–165.Google Scholar
BenYishay, A. (2012), ‘Informational Barriers to Credit for Migrants: Evidence from Guatemala’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 60(3): 535–570.Google Scholar
Biggs, T., Raturi, M., and Srivastava, P. (2002), ‘Ethnic Networks and Access to Credit: Evidence from the Manufacturing Sector in Kenya’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 49(4): 473–486.Google Scholar
Bowles, S. and Gintis, H. (1993), ‘The Revenge of Homo Economicus: Contested Exchange and the Revival of Political Economy’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(1): 83–102.Google Scholar
Chen, M. A. and Raveendran, G. (2014), ‘Urban Employment in India: Recent Trends and Patterns’, WIEGO Working Paper, November 2014.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, S. (2003), ‘Structural and Behavioural Characteristics of Informal Service Employment: Evidence from a Survey in New Delhi’, Journal of Development Studies, 39(3): 51–80.Google Scholar
Deshingkar, P. and Farrington, J. (2009), Circular Migration and Multilocational Livelihoods: Strategies in Rural India, New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dixit, A. (2003), ‘Trade Expansion and Contract Enforcement’, Journal of Political Economy, 111(6): 1293–1317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixit, A. (2009), ‘Governance Institutions and Economic Activity’, American Economic Review, 99(1): 5–24.Google Scholar
Fafchamps, M. (1996), ‘The Enforcement of Commercial Contracts in Ghana’, World Development, 24(3): 427–448.Google Scholar
Fafchamps, M. (2001), ‘The Role of Business Networks in Market Development in Sub-Saharan Africa’, in Aoki, M. and Hayami, Y. (eds.), Communities and Markets in Economic Development, Oxford UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 186–215.Google Scholar
Fafchamps, M. (2002), ‘Spontaneous Market Emergence’, The BE Journal of Theoretical Economics, 2(1): 1–35.Google Scholar
Fields, G. (1975), ‘Rural-Urban Migration, Urban Unemployment and Underemployment, and Job-Search Activity in LDCs’, Journal of Development Economics, 2(2): 165–187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greif, A. (1993), ‘Contract Enforceability and Economic Institution in Early Trade: The Maghribi Traders Coalition’, American Economic Review, 83(3): 525–548.Google Scholar
Greif, A. (1997), On the social foundations and historical development of institutions that facilitate impersonal exchange: From the community responsibility system to individual legal responsibility in pre-modern Europe. Stanford University Working Paper 97-016.Google Scholar
Hallagan, W. (1978), ‘Self-Selection by Contractual Choice and the Theory of Sharecropping’, The Bell Journal of Economics, 9(2): 344–354.Google Scholar
Hayami, Y., Kikuchi, M., and Otsuka, K. (1986), ‘Community and Market in Contract Choice: The Jeepney in the Philippines’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 34(2): 279–298.Google Scholar
Hoff, K. and Stiglitz, J. (1993), ‘Introduction: Imperfect Information and Rural Credit Markets: Puzzles and Policy Perspectives’, in Hoff, K., Braverman, A., and Stiglitz, J. E. (eds.), The Economics of Rural Organization, Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar
JPP (2003), ‘Cycle-Rickshaw in National Capital Region: The Study Report of Action Research Programme on Rickshaw and Rickshaw-Pullers’, 2000–02. Lokayan, Delhi.Google Scholar
Kalton, G. (2001), ‘Practical Methods for Sampling Rare and Mobile Populations’, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Statistical Association, August 5–9. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.600.4603&rep=rep1&type=pdf Google Scholar
Kandori, M. (1992), ‘Social Norms and Community Enforcement’, Review of Economic Studies, 59(1): 63–80.Google Scholar
Keshri, K. and Bhagat, R. (2012), ‘Temporary and Seasonal Migration: Regional Pattern, Characteristics and Associated Factors’, Economic and Political Weekly, 47(4), 81–88.Google Scholar
Kishwar, M. (2006), ‘Cycle Rickshaw: A Post Modern Vehicle’, Manushi, 157 (November-December), pp. 20–33.Google Scholar
Kurosaki, T., Sawada, Y., Banerji, A., and Mishra, S. (2007), ‘Rural-Urban Migration and Urban Poverty: Socio-Economic Profiles of Rickshaw Pullers and Owner-Contractors in North-East Delhi’, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University, Tokyo.Google Scholar
La Ferrara, E. (2003), ‘Kin Groups and Reciprocity: A Model of Credit Transactions in Ghana’, American Economic Review, 93(5): 1730–1751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landa, J. (1981), ‘Theory of the Ethnically Homogeneous Middleman Group: An Institutional Alternative to Contract Law’, Journal of Legal Studies, 10(2): 349–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J. S. (2003), ‘Relation-based versus Rule-based Governance: An Explanation of the East Asian Miracle and Asian Crisis’, Review of international economics, 11(4): 651–673.Google Scholar
Lindbeck, A., Nyberg, S., and Weibull, J. (1999), ‘Social Norms and Economic Incentives in the Welfare State’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(1): 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macours, K., de Janvry, A., and Sadoulet, E. (2010), ‘Insecurity of Property Rights and Social Matching in the Tenancy Market’, European Economic Review, 54(7): 880–899.Google Scholar
McKenzie, D. J. and Mistiaen, J. (2009), ‘Surveying Migrant Households: A Comparison of Census-based, Snowball and Intercept Point Surveys’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 172(2): 339–360.Google Scholar
McMillan, J. and Woodruff, C. (1999), ‘Interfirm Relationships and Informal Credit in Vietnam’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(4): 1285–1320.Google Scholar
Mishra, A. (1994), ‘Clientelization and Fragmentation in Backward Agriculture: Forward Induction and Entry Deterrence’, Journal of Development Economics, 45(2): 271–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitra, A. (2006), ‘Urban Informal Sector and Networks: A Case Study of Delhi Slum Dwellers’, UNU-WIDER Studies in Development Economics and Policy, in Guha-Khasnobis, B. and Kanbur, R. (eds.), Informal Labour Markets and Development, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave-Macmillan UK, pp. 136–154 Google Scholar
Mitra, S. (2002), ‘Lessons in Regulating the Informal Sector: The Case of Rickshaw Pullers’ Sector in Delhi’, Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 45(2): 387–394.Google Scholar
Rao, V. (2002), ‘Experiments in Participatory Econometrics: Improving the Connection between Economic Analysis and the Real World’, Economic & Political Weekly, 22(20): 1887–1891.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Kallert, E. (2009), ‘A New Paradigm of Urban Transition: Tracing the Livelihood Strategies of Multi-Locational Households’, Die Erde, 140(3): 319.Google Scholar
Singh, A. (2000), ‘Rickshaw to the Puller’, Labour File, 6(8 and 9): 16–19.Google Scholar
Sood, A. (2008), ‘Three Essays on the Cycle Rickshaw Rental Market: Informal Markets and Institutions in a City in Central India’, PhD. thesis, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Sood, A. (2012), ‘A Future for Informal Services? The Cycle Rickshaw Sector as Case Study’, Economic & Political Weekly, 47(42): 95–102.Google Scholar
Sood, A. (2013), ‘Making the Connection between Informal Self-Employment and Temporary Migration: Lessons from the Cycle Rickshaw Sector’, in Sridhar, K. and Wan, G. (eds.), Urbanization in Asia, India: Springer, pp. 41–57 Google Scholar
Udry, C. (2003), ‘Fieldwork, Economic Theory, and Research on Institutions in Developing Countries’, American Economic Review, 93(2): 107–111.Google Scholar