Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T13:21:54.853Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The role of regulation in constituting markets: a co-evolutionary perspective on the UK television production sector

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2019

Ana Lourenço Open the ORCID record for Ana Lourenço [Opens in a new window]  and
Simon Turner
Ana Lourenço*
Affiliation:
Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Católica Porto Business School and CEGE, Porto, Portugal
Simon Turner
Affiliation:
Centre for Primary Care, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
*
*Corresponding author. Email: alourenco@porto.ucp.pt
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article builds on a legal institutionalist approach to assess market-based regulatory change in British television production over the last three decades. It explores how formal rules governing television production constitute market relations, and whether these rules are likely to be evaded by television producers and commissioners in a context where contracting depends heavily on social norms of cooperation, reciprocity and flexibility. Using qualitative data, this article suggests that changes in law and terms of trade intended to promote a market in television production have not had a straightforward or linear effect: compulsory independent production quotas and licensing models of terms of trade have redrawn organizational boundaries in unexpected ways, disturbed the public service remit and engendered new financial flows. Formal rules were nonetheless central to the trajectory of the television production industry, as they were a constitutive element of changes in the power structure of the sector towards producers’ interests.

Keywords

legal institutionalismBBCpublic service broadcastingsystems theorytelevision production
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , August 2019 , pp. 615 - 630
Copyright
Copyright © Millennium Economics Ltd 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abraham, D. (2014), MacTaggart Lecture at the Edinburgh TV Festival 2014. Available at https://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/aug/21/david-abraham-mactaggart-lecture-full-text (accessed 15 January 2019).Google Scholar
Aoki, M. (2011), ‘Institutions as Cognitive Media between Strategic Interactions and Individual Beliefs’, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 79(1–2): 30–34.Google Scholar
Armour, J. and Deakin, S. (2001), ‘Norms in Private Insolvency Procedures: The “London Approach” to the Resolution of Financial Distress’, Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 1(1): 21–51.Google Scholar
Baxter, H. (1998), ‘Autopoiesis and the “relative autonomy” of law’, Cardozo Law Review, 19(6): 1987–2090.Google Scholar
BBC (2015a), BBC Studios: Strengthening the BBC's Role in the Creative Industries, London: BBC. Available at www.bbc.co.uk/corporate2/insidethebbc/howwework/reports/bbc_studios_2015/ (accessed 15 January 2019).Google Scholar
BBC (2015b), British, Bold, Creative: The BBC's Programmes and Services in the Next Charter, London: BBC. Available at https://downloads.bbc.co.uk/aboutthebbc/reports/pdf/futureofthebbc2015.pdf (accessed 15 January 2019).Google Scholar
BBC (2018), BBC Studios Annual Review, London: BBC. Available at https://www.bbcstudios.com/annual-review/ (accessed 15 January 2019).Google Scholar
BBC Trust (2015), The Supply Arrangements for the Production of the BBC's Television Content, Radio Content and Online Content and Services, London: BBC. Available at https://downloads.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets/files/pdf/our_work/content_supply/2015/content_supply_review.pdf (accessed 15 January 2019).Google Scholar
Black, J. (2001), ‘Decentring Regulation: Understanding the Role of Regulation and Self Regulation in a “Post-regulatory” World’, Current Legal Problems, 54(1): 103–146.Google Scholar
Boyer, R. and Orléan, A. (1992), ‘How Do Conventions Evolve?’ Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2: 165–177.Google Scholar
Bryman, A. (2004), Social Research Methods, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J., Chai, D. H. and Deakin, S. (2014), ‘Empirical Analysis of Legal Institutions and Institutional Change: Multiple-methods Approaches and their Application to Corporate Governance Research’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 10(1): 1–20.Google Scholar
Carvalho, F. and Deakin, S. (2011), ‘System and Evolution in Corporate Governance’, in: Zumbansen, P. and Calliess, G.-P. (eds) Law, Economics and Evolutionary Theory. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Conlan, T. (2016), ‘Bake Off Shows: How TV's Indies Have Learned the Art of the Deal’, The Guardian, 17 September.Google Scholar
D'Arma, A. (2018), ‘The Hollowing out of Public Service Media: A Constructivist Institutionalist Analysis of the Commercialisation of BBC's In-house Production’, Media, Culture & Society, 40(3): 432–448.Google Scholar
DCMS (Department for Culture, Media and Sport) (2015), BBC Charter Review Public Consultation, London: DCMS, July.Google Scholar
DCMS (Department for Culture, Media and Sport) (2016), A BBC for the future: a broadcaster of distinction, London: DCMS, May.Google Scholar
Deakin, S. (2002), ‘Evolution for Our Time: A Theory of Legal Memetics’, Current Legal Problems, 55(1): 1–42.Google Scholar
Deakin, S., Lourenço, A. and Pratten, S. (2009), ‘No “Third Way” for Economic Organization? Networks and Quasi-markets in Broadcasting’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(1): 51–75.Google Scholar
Deakin, S. (2011), ‘Legal Evolution: Integrating Economic and Systemic Approaches’, Review of Law & Economics, 7(3): 659–683.Google Scholar
Deakin, S., Gindis, D., Hodgson, G., Huang, K. and Pistor, K. (2017), ‘Legal Institutionalism: Capitalism and the Constitutive Role of Law’, Journal of Comparative Economics, 45(1): 188–200.Google Scholar
Deakin, S. and Pratten, S. (2000), ‘Quasi-markets, Transaction Costs, and Trust: The Uncertain Effects of Market Reforms in British Television Production’, Television & New Media, 1(3): 321–354.Google Scholar
Dey, I. (1993), Qualitative Data Analysis, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Doyle, G. (2016), ‘Managing in the Distinctive Economic Context of Media’, in: Lowe, G. F. and Brown, C. (eds) Managing Media Firms and Industries: What's So Special about Media Management? London: Springer.Google Scholar
Doyle, G. and Paterson, R. (2008), ‘Public Policy and Independent Television Production in the UK’, Journal of Media Business Studies, 5(3): 17–33.Google Scholar
Ebbers, J. and Wijnberg, N. (2016), ‘Latent Organizations in the Film Industry: Contracts, Rewards and Resources’, Human Relations, 62(7): 987–1009.Google Scholar
Finch, J. H. and McMaster, R. (2017), ‘History Matters: On the Mystifying Appeal of Bowles and Gintis’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 42(2): 285–308.Google Scholar
Flick, U. (2014), ‘Mapping the Field’, in: Flick, U. (ed.) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Freedman, D. (2016), A Future for Public Service Television: Content and Platforms in a Digital World, London: Goldsmiths, University of London.Google Scholar
Gintis, H. (2009), The Bounds of Reason: Game Theory and the Unification of the Behavioral Sciences, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gintis, H. (2011), ‘Gene-culture Coevolution and the Nature of Human Sociality’, Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society B, 366(1566): 878–888.Google Scholar
Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. (1999), The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. (1989), ‘Institutional Economic Theory: The Old versus the New’, Review of Political Economy, 1(3): 249–268.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. (2006), ‘What are Institutions?’ Journal of Economic Issues, 40(1): 1–25.Google Scholar
House of Commons (2016), BBC Charter Review: First Report of Session 2015–16, London: House of Commons, Culture, Media and Sport Committee.Google Scholar
Hutton, W., O'Keeffe, Á. and Turner, N. (2005), The Tipping Point: How Much is Broadcast Creativity at Risk? London: Work Foundation in partnership with the BBC.Google Scholar
Lampel, J., Lant, T. and Shamsie, J. (2000), ‘Balancing Act: Learning from Organizing Practices in ‘Cultural Industries’, Organization Science, 11(3): 263–269.Google Scholar
Lee, D. (2011), ‘Networks, Cultural Capital and Creative Labour in the British Television Production Industry’, Media, Culture & Society, 33(4): 549–565.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1990), Essays on Self-reference, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1992), ‘Operational Closure and Structural Coupling: The Differentiation of the Legal System’, Cardozo Law Review, 13(5): 1419–1441.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1995 [1984]), Social Systems, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mair, J., Mayer, J. and Lutz, E. (2015), ‘Navigating Institutional Plurality: Organizational Governance in Hybrid Organizations’, Organization Studies, 36(6): 713–739.Google Scholar
Martinson, J. (2016), ‘BBC Presenters’ Salaries over £150,000 to be Made Public’, The Guardian, 14 September.Google Scholar
Mediatique (2005), From the Cottage to the City: The Evolution of the UK Independent Production Sector, London: BBC.Google Scholar
Nicoli, N. (2012), ‘BBC in-House Production and the Role of the Window of Creative Competition’, Journal of Media Business Studies, 9(4): 1–19.Google Scholar
Ofcom (2004), Guidelines for Broadcasters in Drafting Codes of Practice for Commissioning Programmes from Independent Suppliers, London: Ofcom.Google Scholar
Ofcom (2015), BBC Content Production Options – Ofcom's advice to the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, London: Ofcom. Available at https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0022/83083/bbc_content_production_options.pdf/ (accessed 17 January 2019).Google Scholar
Oliver & Ohlbaum (2015), Trends in TV Production: Presentation for Ofcom. Available at https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0027/79551/o_o_annex_trends.pdf (accessed 17 January 2019).Google Scholar
Oliver & Ohlbaum/Oxera (2016), BBC Television, Radio and Online Services: An Assessment of Market Impact and Distinctiveness. Available at https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/504012/FINAL_-_BBC_market_impact_assessment.pdf (accessed 15 January 2019).Google Scholar
Olthaar, M., Dolfsma, W., Lutz, C. and Noseleit, F. (2017), ‘Markets and Institutional Swamps: Tensions Confronting Entrepreneurs in Developing Countries’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 13(2): 243–269.Google Scholar
PACT (2015), Submission to Ofcom's Third Review of Public Service Broadcasting: Public Service Content in a Connected Society, London: PACT. Available at https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0030/37668/pact.pdf (accessed 17 January 2019).Google Scholar
PACT (2018), UK Television Production Survey: Financial Census 2018, London: Oliver & Ohlbaum. Available at http://www.pact.co.uk/news-detail.html?id=tv-production-sector-income-hits-new-high-growth-driven-by-international-revenue (accessed 17 January 2019).Google Scholar
Paterson, R. (2017a), ‘The Competition Discourse in British Broadcasting Policy’, CREATe Working paper 2017/02, Glasgow: University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
Paterson, R. (2017b), ‘Early Independent Production Entrepreneurs in UK Television: Agents of a Neo-liberal Intervention’, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venture, 9(3): 280–298.Google Scholar
Peacock, A. (1986), Report of the Committee on Financing the BBC, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Pistor, K. (2007), ‘Legal Systems in Flux: Analytical and Methodological Challenges’, Conference on Evolutionary and Reflexive Approaches to Corporate Governance, Cambridge: Centre for Business Research, 12–13 December.Google Scholar
Pratten, S. (1997), ‘The Nature of Transaction Cost Economics’, Journal of Economic Issues, 31(3): 781–803.Google Scholar
Preston, A. (2003), Inside the Commissioners, Glasgow: Research Centre for Television and Interactivity.Google Scholar
PwC (PricewaterhouseCoopers) (2015), Outlook special: Over-the-top Television. Available at https://www.pwc.nl/en/publicaties/outlook-special-over-te-top-television.html (accessed 15 January 2019).Google Scholar
Starkey, K, Barnatt, C. and Tempest, S. (2000), ‘Beyond Networks and Hierarchies: Latent Organizations in the UK Television Industry’, Organization Science, 11(3): 299–305.Google Scholar
Sugden, R. (1989), ‘Spontaneous Order’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3(4): 85–97.Google Scholar
Sydow, J. and Staber, U. (2002), ‘The Institutional Embeddedness of Project Networks: The Case of Content Production in German Television’, Regional Studies, 36(2): 215–227.Google Scholar
Teubner, G. (1992), ‘The Two Faces of Janus: Rethinking Legal Pluralism’, Cardozo Law Review, 13(5): 1413–1462.Google Scholar
Teubner, G. (1993), Law as an Autopoietic System, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Turner, S. and Lourenço, A. (2012), ‘Competition and Public Service Broadcasting: Stimulating Creativity or Servicing Capital?’ Socio-Economic Review, 10(3): 497–523.Google Scholar
Turner, S., Lourenço, A. and Allen, P. (2016), ‘Hybrids and Professional Communities: Comparing UK Reforms in Healthcare, Broadcasting, and Postal Services’, Public Administration, 94(3): 700–716.Google Scholar
Ursell, G. (2000), ‘Television Production: Issues of Exploitation, Commodification and Subjectivity in UK Television Labour Markets’, Media, Culture & Society, 22(6): 805–825.Google Scholar
Whittingdale, J. (2015), Keynote Speech at the Royal Television Society Cambridge convention. Available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lxlpm_Sqm34 (accessed 15 January 2019).Google Scholar
Williamson, O. (1975), Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. (2000), ‘The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead’, Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3): 595–613.Google Scholar
Young, H. P. (1996), ‘The Economics of Convention’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(2): 105–122.Google Scholar