Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T23:04:20.614Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Social and scientific disorder as epistemic phenomena, or the consequences of government dietary guidelines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2018

Scott Scheall*
Affiliation:
College of Integrative Sciences and Arts, Arizona State University Polytechnic Campus, Mesa, AZ, USA
William N. Butos
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Trinity College, Hartford, CT, USA
Thomas McQuade
Affiliation:
Independent Scholar, Honolulu, HI, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: scott.scheall@asu.edu

Abstract

We begin with a process-oriented model of science according to which signals concerning scientific reputation serve both to coordinate the plans of individuals in the scientific domain and to ensure that the knowledge that emerges from interactions between scientists and the environment is reliable. Under normal circumstances, scientific order emerges from the publication–citation–reputation (PCR) process of science. We adopt and extend F. A. Hayek's epistemology according to which knowledge affords successful plan-based action and we employ this in the development of an epistemic theory of social order. We propose that external interferences with the PCR process have distorting effects on scientific knowledge and, thus, on scientific and social order more broadly. We support this claim by describing the history of the US federal government's development of standardized dietary guidelines for American consumers and its concomitant interference in the PCR process of nutritional science. We conclude that this interference contributed to social disorder in dietary science and beyond.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Millennium Economics Ltd 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albrink, M. (1962), ‘Serum Triglycerides in Coronary Heart Disease’, Archives of Internal Medicine, 109(31): 345359.Google Scholar
Albrink, M., Meigs, J. W. and Mann, E. B. (1961), ‘Serum Lipids, Hypertension and Coronary Heart Disease’, American Journal of Medicine, 31(1): 423.Google Scholar
Broad, W. J. (1979), ‘Nutrition's Battle of the Potomac’, Nutrition Today, 14(4): 613.Google Scholar
Butos, W. N. and McQuade, T. J. (2006), ‘Government and Science: A Dangerous Liaison?The Independent Review, 11(2): 177208.Google Scholar
Butos, W. N. and McQuade, T. J. (2012), ‘Nonneutralities in science funding: direction, destabilization, and distortion’, Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, 18(1): 126.Google Scholar
Butos, W.N and McQuade, T. J. (2017), ‘Polanyi, Hayek, and Adaptive Systems Theory’, Cosmos + Taxis, 4(1): 122.Google Scholar
Buttriss, J. L. (2016), ‘The Eatwell Guide Refreshed’, Nutrition Bulletin, 41: 135141. DOI: 10.1111/nbu.12211.Google Scholar
Carlson, L. A. and Bottiger, L. E. (1972), ‘Ischaemic Heart-disease in Relation to Fasting Values of Plasma Trigyclerides and Cholesterol’, The Lancet, 299(7756): 856868.Google Scholar
Cowie, C. C., Rust, K. F., Byrd-Holt, D. D. and Fradkin, J. E. (2006), ‘Prevalence of Diabetes and Impaired Fasting Glucose in Adults in the US Population: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999–2002’, Diabetes Care, 29(6): 12631268.Google Scholar
Daniel, C. R., Cross, A. J., Koebnick, C. and Sinha, R. (2011), ‘Trends in Meat Consumption in the USA’, Public Health Nutrition, 14(4): 575583.Google Scholar
Fox, C. S., Pencina, M. J., Meigs, J. B., Vasan, R. S., Levitzky, Y. S., R. B. and D'Agostiono (2006), ‘Trends in the Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus from the 1970s to the 1990s: The Framingham Heart Study’, Circulation, 113(25): 29142918.Google Scholar
Gofman, J. W. (1958), ‘Diet in the Prevention and Treatment of Myocardial Infarction’, American Journal of Cardiology, 1(2): 271283.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1960) The Constitution of Liberty, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (2014a), ‘Economics and Knowledge’, in Caldwell, B. (ed.), The Collected Works of F. A. Hayek, Volume 15: The Market and Other Orders, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 5777.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (2014b), ‘The Use of Knowledge in Society’, in Caldwell, B. (ed.), The Collected Works of F. A. Hayek, Volume 15: The Market and Other Orders, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 93104.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (2014c), ‘The pretense of knowledge’, in Caldwell, B. (ed.), The Collected Works of F. A. Hayek, Volume 15: The Market and Other Orders, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 362372.Google Scholar
Hull, D. L. (1988) Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hunt, P., Gatenby, S. and Rayner, M. (1995), ‘The Format for the National Food Guide: Performance and Preference Studies’, Journal of Human Nutrition Studies and Dietetics, 8(5): 335351.Google Scholar
Hunt, P., Rayner, M., and Gatenby, S. (1995), ‘A National Food Guide for the UK? Background and Development’, Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 8(5): 315322.Google Scholar
JAMA Editorials (1967), ‘Coronary Heart Disease and Carbohydrate Metabolism’, Journal of the American Medical Association, 201(13):10401041.Google Scholar
Kalm, L. M. and Semba, R. D. (2005), ‘They Starved so that Others Be Better Fed: Remembering Ancel Keys and the Minnesota Experiment’, Journal of Nutrition, 135(6): 13471352.Google Scholar
Kearns, C. E., Schmidt, L. A. and Glantz, S. A. (2016), ‘Sugar Industry and Coronary Heart Disease Research: A Historical Analysis of Internal Industry Documents’, Journal of the American Medical Association: Internal Medicine, published online 12 September 2016. DOI:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.5394.Google Scholar
Keys, A. (1953), ‘Atherosclerosis: A Problem in Newer Public Health’, Journal of the Mount Sinai Hospital, 20(2): 118139.Google Scholar
Keys, A. (1970), Coronary Heart Disease in Seven Countries, New York: American Heart Association.Google Scholar
Kjaernes, U. (2003), ‘Food and Nutrition Policies of Nordic Countries’, Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 62(2): 563570. DOI: 1079/PN2003269.Google Scholar
Koppl, R. (2002). Big Players and the Economic Theory of Expectations. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Koppl., R. (2018). Expert Failure. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kuo, P. T. (1967), ‘Hypoglyeridemia in Coronary Artery Disease and its Management’, Journal of the American Medical Association, 210(13): 8794.Google Scholar
Mahmood, S. S., Levy, D., Vasan, R. S. and Wang, T. J. (2013), ‘The Framingham Heart Study and the Epidemiology of Cardiovascular Disease: A Historical Perspective’, Lancet, 383: 9991008.Google Scholar
McQuade, T. J. (2007), ‘Science and Market as Adaptive Classifying Systems’, in Krecké, E., Krecké, C. and Koppl, R. G. (eds), Cognition and Economics: Advances in Austrian Economics (Volume 9), Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 5186.Google Scholar
McQuade, T. J. (2010), ‘Science and The Sensory Order‘, in Butos, W. N. (ed.), The Social Science of Hayek's ‘The Sensory Order’: Advances in Austrian Economics, Volume 13, Bingley: Emerald, pp. 2356.Google Scholar
McQuade, T. J. and Butos, W. N. (2003), ‘Order-Dependent Knowledge and the Economics of Science’, Review of Austrian Economics, 16(2/3): 133152.Google Scholar
McQuade, T. J. and Butos, W. N. (2005), ‘The Sensory Order and Other Adaptive Classifying Systems’, Journal of Bioeconomics, 7(3): 335358.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1996), On Social Structure and Science, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mozzaffarian, D. (2018), ‘History of Modern Nutrition Science – Implications for Current Research, Dietary Guidelines, and Food Policy’, British Medical Journal, 361: 19. DOI: 10:1136/bmj.k2392.Google Scholar
Nissen, S. E. (2016), ‘US Dietary Guidelines: An Evidence-Free Zone’, Annals of Internal Medicine, 164(8): 558560.Google Scholar
NRC (1980), Toward Healthful Diets, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Oppenhimer, G. M. (2010), ‘The Framingham Heart Study: The First Twenty Years’, Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 53(1): 5561.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. (1962), ‘The Republic of Science’, Minerva, 1(1): 5474.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. (1967), The Tacit Dimension, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Scheall, S. (2015), ‘Hayek's Epistemic Theory of Industrial Fluctuations’, History of Economic Ideas, 23(1): 101–22.Google Scholar
Scheall, S. (2016), ‘A Brief Note Concerning Hayek's Non-standard Conception of Knowledge’, Review of Austrian Economics, 29(2): 205210.Google Scholar
Taubes, G. (2007), Good Calories, Bad Calories: Fats, Carbs, and the Controversial Science of Diet and Health, New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
UN Food and Agricultural Organization (2016), ‘Food-Based Dietary Guidelines’, available at www.fao.org/nutrition/education/food-dietary-guidelines/home/en/, accessed 9 August 2018.Google Scholar
Wells, O. C. (1942), ‘America's Changing Food Consumption, 1909–1941’, Journal of Home Economics, 34: 463467.Google Scholar
Yerushalmey, J and Hilleboe, H. E. (1957), ‘Fat in the Diet and Mortality from Heart Disease: A Methodological Note’, New York State Journal of Medicine, 57(14): 23432354.Google Scholar
Yudkin, J. (1988), Pure, White and Deadly, London: Penguin.Google Scholar