Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:12:56.697Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Using organizational economics to engage cultural key masters in creating change in forensic science administration to minimize bias and errors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2011

EVERARD JAMES COWAN
EVERARD JAMES COWAN*
Affiliation:
Fairleigh Dickinson University, Madison, NJ, USA
*
*Email: ejcowan2@fdu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

The administration of the forensic science process falls into the hands of supervisors, local administrators, and prosecution attorneys and police agencies. In the current structure, the police and prosecution are the principal and the forensic scientists the agent. I identify changes that must be made in that relationship to eliminate biases and to determine the major obstacles that stand in the way of creating the necessary changes. I focus on the ‘middle managers’ – the supervisors and laboratory directors – as the cultural key masters. I recommend: mechanism design principles to enable laboratories to report to a board of directors, rather than the prosecutor and police; for the development of compensation plans for middle managers to build a culture of learning based on error tolerance rather than error punishment; and for the use of intrinsic and extrinsic motivations to facilitate the identity changes of cultural key masters.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , March 2012 , pp. 93 - 117
Copyright
Copyright © The JOIE Foundation 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

12Manage (2009), 7-S Framework (McKinsey), http://www.12manage.com/methods_7S.html (accessed 7 January 2010).Google Scholar
Akerlof, G. A. and Kranton, R. E. (2000), ‘Identity and Economics’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115 (3): 715–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akerlof, G. A. and Kranton, R. E. (2002), ‘Identity and Schooling: Some Lessons for the Economics of Education’, Journal of Economic Literature, 40 (4): 1167–1201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akerlof, G. A. and Kranton, R. E. (2005), ‘Identity and the Economics of Organizations’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19 (1): 9–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akerlof, G. A. and Kranton, R. E. (2008), ‘Identity, Supervision, and Work Groups’, American Economic Review, 98 (2): 212–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balogun, J. and Johnson, G. (2004), ‘Organizational Restructuring and Middle Management Sensemaking’, Academy of Management Journal, 47 (4): 523–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackstone, W. (1765)–1769, ‘Of Trials and Conviction’, In Commentaries on the Laws of England, Book 4, Chapter 27, http://www.lonang.com/exlibris/blackstone/ (accessed 6 January 2011).Google Scholar
Blanchard, K., Zigarmi, P., and Zigarmi, D. (1985), Leadership and the One Minute Manager, New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Bromwich, M. R. (2005), Second Report of the Independent Investigator for the Houston Police Department Crime Laboratory and Property Room, http://www.hpdlabinvestigation.org/reports/050531report.pdf (accessed 24 May 2007).Google Scholar
Cellars, T. (2007), Change Management Models: A Look at McKinsey's 7-S Model, Lewin's Change Management Model and Kotter's Eight Step Change Model, http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/237685/change_management_models_a_look_at.html?cat=3 (accessed 6 January 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connors, E., Lundregan, T., Miller, N., and McEwen, T. (1996), Convicted by Juries, Exonerated by Science: Case Studies in the Use of DNA Evidence to Establish Innocence After Trial, Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
Cowan, E. J. and Koppl, R. (2010), ‘Breaking the Error Barrier in Forensic Science: Guilt versus Shame’, (unpublished).Google Scholar
Cowen, T. and Tabarrok, A. (2009), Modern Principles of Economics, New York, NY: Worth Publishers.Google Scholar
Dror, I. E. and Charlton, D. (2006), ‘Why Experts Make Errors’, Journal of Forensic Identification, 56 (4): 600–616.Google Scholar
Durose, M. R. (2008), ‘Census of Public Funded Forensic Crime Laboratories’, Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin, NCJ 222181, http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/cpffcl05.pdf (accessed July 2011).Google Scholar
Fiol, C. and Lyles, M. (1985), ‘Organizational Learning’, Academy of Management Review, 10 (4): 803–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floyd, S. and Wooldridge, B. (1997), ‘Middle Management's Strategic Influence and Organizational Performance’, Journal of Management Studies, 34 (3): 465–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, B. and Jegen, R. (2001), ‘Motivation Crowding Theory’, Journal of Economic Surveys, 15 (5): 589–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, B. L. and Neufeld, P. J. (2009), ‘Invalid Forensic Science Testimony and Wrongful Convictions’, Virginia Law Review, 95 (1): 1–97.Google Scholar
Giannelli, P. C. (1997), ‘The Abuse of Evidence in Criminal Cases: The Need for Independent Crime Laboratories’, Virginia Journal of Social Policy and the Law, 4: 439–478.Google Scholar
Guth, W. D. and MacMillian, I. C. (1986), ‘Strategy Implementation Versus Middle Management Self-interest’, Strategic Management Journal, 7 (4): 313–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hersey, P., Blanchard, K., and Johnson, D. (2008), Management of Organizational Behavior: Leading Human Resources, 9th edn, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Huy, Q. (2002), ‘Emotional Balancing of Organizational Continuity and Radical Change: The Contribution of Middle Managers’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 47 (1): 31–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glenn, M. (2006), ‘Under the Microscope: HPD's Evidence Closely Watched this Time Around’, Houston Chronicle, 11 July 2006, http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/special/crimelab/4038116.html (accessed 24 May 2007).Google Scholar
Innocence Project (2010), Mission Statement, http://www.innocenceproject.org/about/Mission-Statement.php (accessed 4 January 2011).Google Scholar
Kanter, R. M. (1983), The Change Masters: Innovation for Productivity in the American Corporation, New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Khanna, R. (2006), ‘Crime Lab's DNA Section, Shut in ’02, Will Reopen’, Houston Chronicle, 21 June 2006, http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/special/crimelab/3988198.html (accessed 24 May 2007).Google Scholar
King, A. W., Fowler, S. W., and Zeithaml, C. P. (2001), ‘Managing Organizational Competencies for Competitive Advantage: The Middle-Management Edge’, Academy of Management Executive, 15 (2): 95–106.Google Scholar
Koppl, R. (2005), ‘How to Improve Forensic Science’, European Journal of Law and Economics, 20 (3): 255–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koppl, R. (2007), ‘CSI for Real: How to Improve Forensics Science’, Reason Foundation, http://reason.org/ps364_forensics.pdf (accessed 4 January 2011).Google Scholar
Koppl, R. (2010), ‘Romancing Forensics: Legal Failure in Forensic Science Administration’, in Lopez, E. (ed.), Government Failure in the Legal System: A Public Choice Review of the Law, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Koppl, R. and Cowan, E. J. (2010), ‘A Battle of Forensic Experts is Not a Race to the Bottom’, Review of Political Economy, 22 (2): 235–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koppl, R., Kurzban, R., and Kobilinsky, L. (2008), ‘Epistemics for Forensics’, Epistmeme: Journal of Social Epistemology, 5 (2): 141–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotter, J. (1995), ‘Leading Change: Why Transformation Efforts Fail (Cover Story)’, Harvard Business Review, 73 (2): 59–67.Google Scholar
Kotter, J. (1996), Leading Change, Boston: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
Krane, D. E., Ford, S., Gilder, J. R., Inman, K., Jamieson, A., Koppl, R., Kornfield, I. L., Risinger, D. M., Rudin, N., Taylor, M. S., and Thompson, W. C. (2008), ‘Sequential Unmasking: A Means of Minimizing Observer Effects in Forensic DNA Interpretation’, Letter to the Editor, Journal of Forensic Sciences, 53 (4): 1006–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubler-Ross, E. (1973), On Death and Dying, New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laffont, J. and Martimort, D. (2002), The Theory of Incentives, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, D. M. and Peart, S. J. (2008), ‘Sympathetic Bias’, Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 17 (3): 265–277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewin, K. (1958), ‘Group Decision and Social Change’, in Newcomb, T. M. and Hartley, E. L. (eds.), Readings in Social Psychology, New York: Harper & Row, pp. 201–216.Google Scholar
Mills, S. and Possley, M. (2001), ‘Report Alleges Crime Lab Fraud. Scientist Is Accused of Providing False Testimony’, Chicago Tribune, 14 January 2004, http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/watchdog/chi-010114roscetti,0,5511992.story (accessed 20 March 2011).Google Scholar
Mills, S. and Possley, M. (2004), ‘Texas Man Executed on Disproved Forensics: Fire that Killed his 3 Children Could Have Been Accidental’, Chicago Tribune, 9 December 2004, http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2004-12-09/news/0412090169_1_cameron-todd-willingham-arson-fire-fire-scene (accessed 20 March 2011).Google Scholar
Moxley, R. S. (2005), ‘The Case of the Dog That Couldn't Sniff Straight: Sloppy Police Work, Callous Prosecutors, Indifferent Judges Doom Dirt-poor Latino Man’, OC Weekly, 3 November 2005, http://www.ocweekly.com/2005-11-03/news/the-case-of-the-dog-that-couldn-t-sniff-straight/1 (accessed 20 March 2011).Google Scholar
Moxley, R. S. (2008), (Moxley Confidential) ‘CSI Games: If DNA Evidence Doesn't Fit in Orange County, Alter It’, OC Weekly, 2 March 2008, http://www.ocweekly.com/2008-03-13/news/csi-games/ (accessed 20 March 2011).Google Scholar
National Institutes of Health (2006), Coroner vs. Medical Examiner, http://www.nlm.nih.gov/visibleproofs/galleries/cases/examiner.html (accessed 3 January 2011).Google Scholar
National Research Council of the National Academies (2009), Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Niskanen, W. A. (1975), ‘Bureaucrats and Politicians’, Journal of Law and Economics, 18 (December): 617–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, J. L., Lin, G., Ho, M., Chen, Y., and Gaensslen, R. E. (2003a), ‘The Feasibility of External Blind DNA Proficiency Testing. I. Background and Findings’, Journal of Forensic Science, 48 (1): 21–31.Google ScholarPubMed
Peterson, J. L., Lin, G., Ho, M., Chen, Y., and Gaensslen, R. E. (2003b), ‘The Feasibility of External Blind DNA Proficiency Testing. II. Experience with Actual Blind Tests’, Journal of Forensic Science, 48 (1): 32–40.Google ScholarPubMed
Posner, R. A. (2010), ‘From the New Institutional Economics to Organization Economics: With Applications to Corporate Governance, Government Agencies, and Legal Institutions’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 6 (1): 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prendergast, C. (2007), ‘The Motivation and Bias of Bureaucrats’, American Economic Review, 97 (1): 180–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prendergast, C. (2008), ‘Intrinsic Motivation and Incentive’, American Economic Review, 98 (2): 201–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pyrek, K. M. (2007), Forensic Science Under Siege: The Challenges of Forensic Laboratories and the Medico-Legal Death Investigation System, Amsterdam and Boston: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Reason, J. (1990), Human Error, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risinger, M., Saks, M. J., Thompson, W. C., and Rosenthal, R. (2002), ‘The Daubert/Kumho Implications of Observer Effects in Forensic Science: Hidden Problems of Expectation and Suggestion’, California Law Review, 90 (1): 1–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudin, N. and Inman, K. (2001), An Introduction to Forensic DNA Analysis, 2nd edn, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudin, N. and Inman, K. (2005), ‘The Shifty Paradigm, Part I: Who Gets to Define the Practice of Forensic Science?’, The CAC News, 4th Quarter: 13–16.Google Scholar
Rudin, N. and Inman, K. (2006), ‘The Shifty Paradigm, Part II: Errors and Lies and Fraud, Oh My!’, The CAC News, 1st Quarter: 16–18.Google Scholar
Saks, M. and Koehler, J. J. (2005), ‘The Coming Paradigm Shift in Forensic Identification Science’, Science, 309 (5736): 892–895.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Samuelson, P. A. (1954), ‘The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 36 (4): 387–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, J. (2007), ‘FBI's Forensic Test Full of Holes: Lee Wayne Hunt is One of Hundreds of Defendants Whose Convictions are in Question Now That FBI Forensic Evidence Has Been Discredited’, Washington Post, 18 November 2007.Google Scholar
Stutzman, R. (2007a), ‘Print Analyst Supervised Co-Workers, Record Shows’, Orlando Sentinel, 16 May 2007, http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/seminole/orlfingerprint16×07may16,0,35981.story?coll=orl-news-headlines-seminole (accessed 3 March 2011).Google Scholar
Stutzman, R. (2007b), ‘Fingerprint Scandal Costs Analyst Her Job’, Orlando Sentinel, 7 June 2007, http://www.nacdl.org/sl_docs.nsf/issues/crimelabs007 (accessed 20 March 2011).Google Scholar
Swecker, C. and Wolf, M. (2010), ‘An Independent Review of the SBI Laboratory’, http://media2.newsobserver.com/smedia/2010/08/18/13/SBIreview.source.prod_affiliate.156.pdf (accessed 26 August 2010).Google Scholar
Tabarrok, A. (2009), Asteroid Deflection as a Public Good, http://www.marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2009/12/asteroid-deflection-as-a-public-good.html (accessed 4 January 2011).Google Scholar
The North Carolina Innocence Inquiry Commission (2010), North Carolina Innocence Inquiry Commission, http://www.innocencecommission-nc.gov/about.htm (accessed 26 August 2010).Google Scholar
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (2000), ‘Rational Choice and the Framing Decision’, in Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (eds.), Choices, Values, and Frames, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 209–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Virginia Department of Forensic Science (2009), Forensic Science Board, http://www.dfs.virginia.gov/about/fsBoard.cfm#statutes (accessed 6 January 2010).Google Scholar
Weick, K. (1988), ‘Enacted Sensemaking in Crisis Situations’, Journal of Management Studies, 25 (4): 305–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitman, G. and Koppl, R. (2010), ‘Rational Bias in Forensic Science’, Law, Probability and Risk, 9 (1): 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zucchino, D. (2006), ‘Duke Case Worsens for Prosecution’, Los Angeles Times, 16 December 2006, http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-duke16dec16,1,7339197.story?coll=la-headlines-nation&ctrack=1&cset=true (accessed 20 March 2011).Google Scholar